Dynamics of the implementation of the protective role in the conduct of crimes: the practice of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

• Dariia Balobanova National University «Odesa Law Academy»
• Iryna Gorbachova National University «Odesa Law Academy»
• Anastasiia Otsyatsya National University «Odesa Law Academy»
• Mykhailo Dmytruk National University «Odesa Law Academy»
• Anastasiia Khylchenko National University «Odesa Law Academy»

Palabras clave: human rights protection function, criminal sentences, crimes, jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, legal practice.

Resumen

Criminal law offers the possibility of interfering with human life. To avoid such unjustified interference, society and the state must guarantee that human and civil rights are protected and that the standards established in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms are observed. Therefore, it is important to analyze the dynamics of the implementation of the protective function in the conviction of crimes in the interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights ECHR. In the methodological, he made of dialectics and documentary observation. The work aims to analyze the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, which tracks the dynamics of the protection function in sentencing for crimes. As a result of the study, the dynamics of the protection function in sentencing for criminal offenses were clarified through the practice of the ECHR, the problematic issues of the implementation of the protection function were analyzed in the example of Ukraine and foreign countries, and proposals were made, to use the practice of the ECHR as a “living tool” for the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms.

Citas

ARBELÁEZ-CAMPILLO, Diego Felipe; ROJAS-BAHAMÓN, Magda J.; ARBELÁEZ-ENCARNACIÓN Tanya Fernanda. 2018. “Notes for the debate of the categories universal citizenship, human rights and globalization” In: Cuestiones Políticas. Vol. 34, No. 61, pp. 139-161.

CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE. 2016. Law of June 28, 1996, No. 254k / 96-VR. Revision of September 30, 2016, grounds – 1401-19. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE. 2001. Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian Parliament). 2001, no. 2341-III. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE. 2012. Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian Parliament). 13.04.2012, no. 4651-VI. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/4651-17. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

DROBUSH, Iryna; OLKINA, Olena; VODOPIAN, Tetiana; BUT, Illia. 2019. Constitutional guarantee of the right to judicial protection in disputes concerning the invalidity of a will as grounds for the acquisition of property rights in Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, No. 22, pp. 766-772.

DROZDOV, Oleksandr. 2017. “NON BIS IN IDEM – A European guideline for ensuring the sustainability and unity of case law by the Supreme Court”. In: Law of Ukraine. No. 6, pp. 110-132.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1950. European convention on human RIGHTS. Available online. In: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1999. Judgment in the case of Selmouni v. France of 28 July 1999. No. 25803/94. Refworld. Available online. In: https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECHR,3ae6b70210.html. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2011. Judgment in the case of Mocallal v. Ukraine of 10 November 2011. (Application №19246 / 10). Available online. In: http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/SOO00339.html/. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2012. Judgment in the case of Grigoryev v. Ukraine of 15 May 2012. (Application no. 51671/07). Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_833#Text. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2012. Judgment in the case of Iglin v. Ukraine of 12 January 2012. (Application no. 39908/05). Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_780#Text. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2012. Judgment in the case of Klishin v. Ukraine of 23 February 2012. (Application №30671 / 04). Available online. In: http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/SOO00389.html. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2015. Judgment in the case of Ruslan Yakovenko v. Ukraine of 4 June 2015. (Application no. 5425/11). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-154978%22]}. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

GOTOROVA, Natalia O. 2014. Protective function of criminal law. The science of criminal law in the system of interdisciplinary relations. Available online. In: http://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/7065/1/Gutorova_31.pdf. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

GRISHKOVETS, Alla Leonidivna. 2017. A separate opinion of a judge of the Ovruch District Court of the Zhytomyr Region of August 16, 2017. In: Liga360. Available online. In: https://verdictum.ligazakon.net/document/68339984. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

KHILYUK, Svitlana Volodymyrivna. 2015. "Crime and Punishment in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms”. In: Journal of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine. Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 108-125.

KOLESNIKOV, Igor. 2019. Are Ukrainian judges ready for the amendment of the legislation – abuse of rights! Reasoning practice. In: National Bar Association of Ukraine. Available online. In: https://unba.org.ua/publications/print/4292-chi-gotovi-ukrains-ki-suddi-do-noveli-zakonodavstva-zlovzhivannya-pravom-mirkuvannya-praktika.html. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

KOVALSKY, Victor. 2010. “The protective function of law: the question of historical conditionality”. In: Legal Ukraine: Theory and History of State and Law. No. 2, pp.15-19.

LAW AND BUSINESS. 2012. Generalization of the practice of application by courts of general jurisdiction of the first and appellate instances in criminal proceedings of Articles 3, 5, 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 for 2011 – the first half of 2012. (n.d.). Available online. In: https://zib.com.ua/ua/print/33771-uzagalnennya_praktiki_zastosuvannya_statey_3_5_6_konvencii_p.html. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

LAW OF UKRAINE. 2006. On the Enforcement of Judgments and the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights: Law of Ukraine of 23 February 2006, No. 3477-IV. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

NAFIKOVA, Gulnara Aidarovna. 2010. “Protection of human and civil rights in foreign countries”. In: Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology. No. 4, pp. 107-111.

SLUTSK, Tatyana Ivanovna. 2019. 250 legal positions of the ECtHR in criminal proceedings: updated, systematized selection. In: Protocol. Available online. In: https://protocol.ua/ua/250_pravovih_pozitsiy_espl_u_ kriminalnomu_provadgenni_onovlena_sistematizovana_dobirka/. Consultation date: 28/11/2019.

TSIURA, Vadym; KHARCHENKO, Heorhii H.; SABODASH, Roman. 2020. The civil legal category of property rights in Ukraine in the context of ECtHR decisions: problems of theory and practice. Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 9, No. 26, pp. 197-204.

VASHAKIDZE, Natalya A. 2019. “Protection of the rights of juvenile offenders while serving sentences in different countries”. In: Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. No. 4, pp. 131-135.