Some Questions of Parole in the Criminal Law of the Russian Federation

  • Ildar A. Tarhanov Federal University Kazan
  • Ramil R. Gayfutdinov Federal University Kazan
  • Adel M. Karimov Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
  • Ilnur A. Muzafarov Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs
Palabras clave: repair of the damage caused, parole, criminal law of the Russian ferdecaon punishment, role model, victim.

Resumen

The article examined fundamental issues of parole in the criminal law of the Russian Federation and, at the same time, aspects of the negative deloscope impact on the identity of the inso, from various points of view on the "social elevators" programme. All these social problems cause a low level of voluntary softening of the damage caused to the victim. During the analysis, we found that the legislature did not formulate well the model that it behaves encouraging to compensate for the damage caused, as set out in the standard text. An indication of the possibility of using incentives in the event of damages the possibility of an ambiguous interpretation of the standard text, leading to difficulties in law enforcement. In the conclusions, we express our position on the need for legal regulation other than this issue. Particular attention was paid to the victim's role in determining the amount of damage. The input of the article focused on discussing various approaches to this issue and establishing the need to clarify the criminal legal status of the victim at the level of the plenary session of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

Biografía del autor/a

Ildar A. Tarhanov, Federal University Kazan
Doctor of Law, Professor, Scientific Director of the Law Faculty of Kazan (Volga) Federal University Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation.
Ramil R. Gayfutdinov, Federal University Kazan
Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Kazan (Volga) Federal University, (t.: 88432337103), Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation.
Adel M. Karimov, Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Senior Lecturer, Department of Economics of Financial Law, Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, (t.: 89272444355). Kazan Law Institute, Kazan, Russian Federation.

Ilnur A. Muzafarov, Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs
**** Lecturer, Department of Administrative Law and Administrative Activities, Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, (t.: 89655951938).

Citas

ASHYN, Andre; SIMAGINA, Nataliie. 2014. Parole under Russian and Foreign Law: a Comparative Legal Analysis: Study Guide. Publishing House of the VSU. Vladimir, Russia.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PENITENTIARY SYSTEM. 2019. Official Web-Site of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. Available online. In: http://фсин.рф/structure/inspector/iao/statistika/Kratkaya%20har-ka%/. Consultation date: 12/03/2019).

COLLECTION OF THE UNITED NATIONS STANDARDS AND NORMS IN CRIME PREVENTION AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE. 2016. New York, 463–470.

DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT FOR THE PENAL SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION UNTIL. 2010. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1772-р dated October 14, 2010 (as amended on September 23, 2015). Accessed from the "Consultant Plus" Reference Legal System.

DROZDOV, Andrei; ORLOV, Andrey. 2018. Actual Parole Issues. Actual Problems of Russian law. Vladimir, Russia.

EARLE, Rod. 2018. “Convict criminology in England: developments and dilemmas” In: The British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 1499-1516.

ESAKOV, Gennady. 2017. Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (itemized). 7th edition, revised and supplemented. - Prospect, 736 p.

EUROPEAN CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ETS NO. 005. 2001. Dated November 3, 1950. Bulletin of International Treaties, March, 3.

EVANS, Douglas. 2019. “Full disclosure: experimental analysis of female online dating on parole” In: Journal of Experimental Criminology. Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 179-199.

IN THE CASE ON VERIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PART 2 OF ARTICLE 399 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REGARDING TO THE REQUEST OF THE KETOVSKY DISTRICT COURT OF THE KURGAN REGION: RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NO. 5-П. 2014. Dated March 18. Accessed from the "ConsultantPlus" Legal Reference System.

JANSSEN, Heleen; OBERWITTLER, Dietrich; KOEBER, Gilva. 2020. "Victimization and its consequences for well-being: A between-and within-person analysis" In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Vol. 18, pp. 1-40.

KARABANOVA, Elina; TSEPELEV, Katrin. 2016. “Stimulation of Accused to Compensation for Harm Caused by Crime: Problems and Prospects. Russian Justice” In: Yurist. Vol. 5, pp. 27–33.

KIMCHI, Anat. 2019. “Investigating the assignment of probation conditions: Heterogeneity and the role of race and ethnicity” In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 715-745.

OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 2012 .NL 315. 14.11. P. 57.

ON THE CLAIM OF CITIZEN SAVENKOV VLADIMIR NIKOLAEVICH AGAINST THE VIOLATION OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BY PART 1 OF ARTICLE 79 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NO. 110-О-П. 2007. Dated February 20. Accessed from the "Consultant Plus" Reference Legal System.

PIONTKOVSKY, Andre. 1900. Parole: Criminal Political Investigation. Publishing House of the Imperial University. Kazan, Russia.

RAROG, Alekseij Ivanovich. 2004. Criminal Law of Russia. General and Special Parts: Textbook. Kazan, Russia.

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE “ON THE VICTIM'S STATUS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCESS” NO. R (85). 1998. Dated June 28, 1985. Collection of Documents of the Council of Europe in the Field of Human Rights and the Fight Against Crime. – М.: SPARK, 114 – 116.

RENGIFO, Andres; DEWITT, Samuel. 2019. “Incarceration and personal networks: Unpacking measures and meanings of tie strength” In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 393-431.

RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NO. 8. 2009. "On Judicial Practice of Parole, Replacement of Unserved Part of the Sentence with a Milder Type of Punishment" Dated April 21, (2009). Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 7, July, P. 23.

SINENKO, Sergey. 2014. Ensuring the Rights and Legitimate Interests of the Victim in Criminal Proceedings: Abstract of a Thesis for the Doctor of Law. Khabarovsk, Russia.

STEINER, Benjamin; CAIN, Calli. 2019. “The effect of removing sentencing credits on inmate misbehavior” In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 89-108.

SUNDUROV, Fedor Romanovich. 2016. Criminal Law of Russia. General Part: Textbook. Statut. Tarkhanov.

SUNDUROV, Fedor Romanovich; TALAN, Mariya Vyacheslavovna. 2015. Sundurov F.R. Punishment in Criminal Law: Study Guide. Samara, Russia.

SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN. 2019. INFORMATION ON THE RESULTS OF CHECKING THE WORK OF THE COURTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN ON THE ISSUES OF APPLYING PAROLE AND REPLACING THE UNSERVED PART OF A SENTENCE WITH A MILDER TYPE OF PUNISHMENT. Available online. In: http://vs.tat.sudrf.ru/modules.php? Name=docum_sud&id=208. Consultation date: 12/09/2019.

TARKHANOV, Ivan. 2001. Promoting Positive Behavior in Criminal Law: Monograph. Publishing House of the KSU. Kazan, Russia.

THE APPEAL DECISION OF THE TAMBOV REGIONAL COURT IN THE CASE NO. 22-1247. 2017. Dated August 29. Accessed from the "Garant" Reference Legal System.

THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NO. 63-ФЗ. 1996. Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 17.06.1996. No. 25. Art. 2954.

THE PENAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NO. 174-ФЗ. 2001. Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 24.12.2001. No. 52 (Part I), Art. 4921.

THE PENAL CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NO. 1-FZ. 1997. (as amended on December 20, 2017). Official Gazette of the Russian Federation. 1997. No. 2. Art. 198.

USMANOV, Iillya. 2014. Parole of Persons Sentenced to Deprivation of Liberty under the Laws of Russia and the its Application in Tatarstan: Abstract of a Thesis for the Candidate of Law. Kazan, Russia.

VLADIMIROVA, Olivia. 2015. Exemption from Criminal Liability due to Reconciliation with the Victim: Thesis for the Candidate of Law. Samara, Russia.

WEB-SITE RUSSIAN NEWSPAPER. 2016. Available online. In: URL:https://rg.ru/2016/03/09/rf-zaniala-10-mesto-v-mire-po-chisluzakliuchennyh-na-100-tysiach-zhitelej.html. Consultation date: 15/06/2020.

WEISBURD, David; HASISI, Badi; SHOHAM, Efrat; AVIV, Gali; HAVIV, Noam. 2017. “Reinforcing the impacts of work release on prisoner recidivism: The importance of integrative interventions” In: Journal of Experimental Criminology. Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 241-264.

Publicado
2020-12-09