Models of Marginality in the Historical-Theoretical and Political-Legal Contexts
The research analyzes different models of marginality in historical-legal and political-legal contexts. The relevance of the study is due to the significant risks of spreading marginality in modern society, as a prerequisite for legal anomia. Understanding marginality, as one of the destructive forms of legal awareness and legally significant limiting behavior, allows marginality to be modeled historically and theoretically in relation to sociocultural phenomena such as state and law. At the methodological level, documentary design was used close to historical research and epistemological reflection typical of interdisciplinary dialogue. It is concluded that the use of legal means and techniques to combat marginality is based on the hypothesis of legal consciousness, according to which anyone initially focuses on consciousness, socially active and useful, and therefore on lawful behavior established by law. This approach can be formed, strengthened, or restored through the implementation of educational, ideological, and other functions of law, political science, or history.
AINOUTDINOVA, Karina A ; AINOUTDINOVA, Irina N. 2019. “Deviant behaviors among young people as a result of inadequate parental attachment / Karina A. Ainoutdinova, Irina N. Ainoutdinova” In: The IIOAB Journal (IIOABJ), Issue: Multidisciplinary Social Science & Management. Vol. 10, No. S1, pp. 168-171 (In Russian).
ATOYAN, Armen I. 1993. “Social marginalism on the premises of a new interdisciplinary and cultural-historical synthesis” In: Political studies. No. 6, pp. 29-38.
BAKULINA, Liliya T. 2014. “The Roman spirit" of the code of Napoleon” In: Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 5, No. 24, pp. 477-479.
BILLSON, Janet Mancini. 1988. “No owner of soil. The concept of marginality revisited on its sixtieth birthday” In: New Delhi: International Review of Modern Sociology. Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 183-204.
BRADATAN, Costica; CRAIUTU, Aurelian. 2012. “Introduction: The Paradoxes of Marginality / Costica Bradatan, Aurelian Craiutu” In; The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms. Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 721-729.
DAVLETGILDEEV, Rustem Sh; KLIMOVSKAYA, Lenara R. 2019. “Legal status of platform workers in Russia: Right on unemployment and social assistance” In: Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews. Vol. 7; No. 6, pp. 639-643.
DEL PILAR, Jose A; UDASCO, Jocelynda O. 2004. “Marginality theory: The lack of construct validity” In: Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 26; No. 1, pp. 3-15.
FARGE, Arlette. 1989. Marginality In 50/50: An Experience of the Dictionary of New Thinking (eds. Mark Ferro, Y. Afanasiev). Moscow: Progress Publishing House. Moscow, Russia.
FEOFANOV, Konstantin A. 1992. “Social marginality: characteristics of the main concepts and approaches in modern sociology (Review)” In: Social Sciences Abroad, Abstract journal series 11, Sociology. No. 2, 70-83.
KHAZIEVA, Nataliia O; KHAZIEV, Aklim Kh; STEPANENKO, German N; STEPANENKO, Ravya F; ELENA Vl. 2019. “Russia in the focus of the existence and the due” In: Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews. Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 107-110.
PARK, Robert E. 1928. “Human Migration and the Marginal Man. Chicago” In: American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 881-893.
POPOVA, Irina P. 2000. Evolution of the concept of marginality in the history of sociology. In Marginal in modern Russia. Collective monograph. Moscow Public Science Foundation (MPSF). Moscow, Russia.
ROMASHOV, Roman A., & BRYLEVA, Elena A. 2019. “Post-prison resocialization – myth or reality?” In: Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University Law. Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 827-835 (In Russian).
ROMASHOV, Roman. A; TIMOFEEVA, Elena A; TONKOV, Evgeny N. 2017. “Prison Industry: Economy, Law and Information and Communication Technologies In "Advances in Intelligent Systems & Computing" (AISC)” In: Perspectives on the use of New ICT in the modern economy. No. 726, pp. 563-572.
SAINAKOV, Nikolai A. 2013. “Marginality as a concept. Methodological perspectives in historical research” In: Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. No. 375, pp. 97-101 (In Russian).
STEPANENKO, Raviya F. 2014. “Causality, concept, and types of legal marginality” In: State and law. No. 6, pp. 98-103 (In Russian).