Constitutional Principles Of Judiciary: Peculiarities Of Formalization In The Cis Countries

• Aleksej P. Treskov Rostov state University of railway engineering
• Lyudmila V. But’ko Northern Caucasian branch of the «Russian state University of justice»
• Ruslan M. Dzidzoev Kuban state University
• Alevtina E. Novikova Belgorod State University
• Andrey A. Solovyev Kutafin Moscow State Law University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3764.05

Palabras clave: constitutional principle, judicial principle, power of attorney

Resumen

The modern principles of judiciary, being an integrative constitutional-theoretical category, are the object of scientific research from the point of view of a meaningful interpretation, as well as the specific nature of formalization, including its the comparative legal aspect. In this regard, the research subject of this article is represented by the norms of the constitutions of the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States. The article presents the analysis results, which allowed us identifying the non-standard approaches to consolidate the constitutional principles of the judiciary in the focus group of acts. We associate these approaches with the compositional specific nature of principle reflection, as well as with the variably-substantive aspect, which quantitatively and qualitatively supplements the standard list of required fundamental ideas.

Citas

AKBARZADEH, Shahram. 1996. “Nation-building in Uzbekistan” In: Central Asian Survey. Available online. In: https://doi. org/10.1080/02634939608400931. Date of consultation: 03/04/2019.

BEYER, Judith. 2015. “Constitutional faith law and hope in revolutionary Kyrgyzstan” In: Ethnos. Available online. In: https://www.tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10.1080/00141844.2013.841270?scroll=top&needAccess =true&journalCode=retn20. Date of consultation: 06/04/2019.

DAVE, B. 2007. “Kazakhstan. Nations in Transit” Available online. In: http://www. freedomhouse. hu/images/fdh_galleries/NIT2007/nt-kazakhstan. pdf. Date of consultation: 14/06/2019.

KHABRIEVA, T. Y. 2018. Constitutional Modernization in the CIS Countries: New Trends. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Available online. In: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1019331618010033. Date of consultation: 14/06/2019.

GRIBNAU, Halin. 2002. Legitimacy of the Judiciary. In: E. Hondius and C. Joustra (red.) Netherlands Reports to the Sixteenth International Congress of Comparative Law, Antwerpen [etc.]: Intersentia, pp. 25-45.

KOFLER, B. 2008. Azerbaijan. In European Ombudsman-Institutions. Springer. Vienna, Austria.

MOLDOVA, C. R. 2004. Constitution of the Republic of Moldova. Constitutional Court. Chisinau, Moldova.

PINESCHI, Leo. 2015. General Principles of Law – The Role of the Judiciary. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. Zurich, Switzerland.

SHAW, G. M. 1995. The Constitution of Belarus: A Good First Step Towards the Rule of Law. Touro Int’l L. Rev., Vol. 6, p. 125.

TRESKOV, A; ARISTOV, E; NOVIKOVA, A; SOLOVYEV, A; KHLEBNIKOV, A. 2019. “Standard constitutional catalog of principles of judicial authority in the CIS countries” In: Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, No.7, Vol. 3, pp. 521-526.

TRESKOV, Albina Pavel. 2018. “Judiciary principles: experience of standard constitutional legalization in the CIS countries” In: Socio-political sciences, No. 4, pp. 112-116. (In Russian).

LIBRARY OF CONSTITUTIONS ROMAN PASHKOV. 2020. Constitutions of the states of the world. Available online. In: https://worldconstitutions. ru/. Date of consultation: 11/11/2019.

VASILYAN, S. 1994. Towards Constitutionalism for the Republic of Armenia. Constellations. Yerevan, Armenia.

WARNER, S. B. 1936. Role of Courts and Judicial Councils in Procedural Reform. U. Pa. L. Rev., 85, p. 441.