Constitutional-Legal and Political Responsibility of Political Parties in the Russian Federation to Electors

• Alla N. Gutorova Southwest state university
• Sergey D. Andreev Belgorod State University
• Tatyana I. Arutyunyan St. Petersburg Military Order of Zhukov Institute of National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation
• Vladimir V. Korovin Southwest State University
• Vlalimir A. Troyan Belgorod State University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3746.04

Palabras clave: political parties in Russia, constitutional responsibility, political responsibility

Resumen

The processes of development of government institutions in the Russian Federation have required the introduction of new mechanisms of legal responsibility of subjects of power relations in legislation. In recent times, the most significant practical interest is the problem of the early termination of the exercise of power of elected officials in legislative positions. The objective of the article is therefore to analyze the legal and political responsibility of the officials of the democratically elected state before their voters. In the process on the subject of the study, the formal-legal and comparative-legal methods were used, which allowed to formulate the following conclusions. The subjects of the above responsibility may be elected officials of the legislative (representative) bodies of state power. The constitutional status of elected persons exercising public authority on behalf of individuals suggests the possibility of terminating their powers as sanctions only on the basis of the rules of law enshrined in the relevant acts and establishing clear reasons and procedures for liability. The current legislation of the Russian Federation provides for various types of constitutional and legal sanctions. They consist of depriving elected officials of their powers.

Citas

BAJTIN Mikail. 2002. O ponyatii gosudarstva. In: Pravovedenie. No. 3, pp. 14. (In Russian).

BOBROVA, Natalia; ZRAZHEVSKAYA, T.D. 1985. Otvetstvennost‘ v sisteme garantij konstitutsionnykh norm (gosudarstvenno-pravovye aspekty). Voronezh. (In Russian).

IVANOV, Anton Alexandrovich. 2003. TSeli yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti, ee funktsii i printsipy. In: Gosudarstvo i pravo. No 6, pp. 67-69. (In Russian).

IVANOVA, Olga; CHALYKH, Ivanovna; MAKOGON, Boris; RASSKAZOV, Ilia L.; VASEKINA, Elnea. 2019. Investigation the role of religious organizations in system of general education: forms of state-confessional interaction. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, Vol. No, 7 (4), pp. 818-821

KALMYKOVA, Darya Valery. 2018. Publichno-pravovaya otvetstvennost’ politicheskikh partij. In: Rossijskoe gosudarstvovedenie. No. 3, pp. 29- 37. (In Russian).

KOLOSOVA NINA MYKHAYLIVNA. 1997. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost’ – samostoyatel’nyj vid yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti. Gosudarstvo i pravo. No 2, pp. 89-115. (In Russian).

KOLOSOVA NINA MYKHAYLIVNA. 2000. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost’ v Rossijskoj Federatsii. M. (In Russian).

KONDRASHEV, Alexander. 1999. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost’ sub”ektov federatsii: voprosy teorii i zakonodatel’nogo regulirovaniya v Rossijskoj Federatsii. Krasnoyarsk. (In Russian).

KONDRASHEV, Alexander. 2006. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost’ politicheskikh partij i inykh obshhestvennykh ob”edinenij v rossijskom zakonodatel’stve. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo. # 11: 17. (In Russian).

LAZAREV, Vyacheslav Valery. 1999. Konstitutsionnoe parvo. M. (In Russian).

LIPINSKIJ Dimitry Adamovich. 2003. Regulyativnaya funktsiya konstitutsionnoj otvetstvennosti. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo. No. 4, pp. 22-35. (In Russian).

MAKOGON, Boris; SAVEL’EVA, I. V; LYAHKOVA, Anzhelika I. L; PARSHINA, A. A; EMEL’ANOV, A. S. 2017. Interpretation of legal responsibility as a universal instrument of procedural legal restrictions. In: Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, No. 7, pp. 328-332.

MAKOGON, Boris V; MARKHGEYM, Marina V; MINASYAN, Anna A; NOVIKOVA, Alevtina E; YARYCHEV, Nasrudi U. 2019. Logical classification of legal procedural restrictions. REVISTA INCLUSIONES. Volumen 6. Númeroe special–abril/junio, pp. 392-401.

MAMUT, L. Svetlana 1999. Problema otvetstvennosti naroda. In: Voprosy filosofii. No 8, pp. 19-28. (In Russian).

NESMEYANOVA, Svetlana E; RYABOVA, Tatiana V; TKHABISIMOVA, Lyudmila A; TSAPKO, Maxim I; MAKOGON, Boris V. 2018. Modern Paradigms of Legal Understanding and the Development of Legal Consciousness in Supply Chain (Case Study of Russia). International Journal of Supply Chain Management, No. 7, Vol. (5), pp. 796-800.

RUDOLPH, Tatiana Ivanovich .2003. Institutional Context and the Assignment of Political Responsibility. In: The Journal of Politics, No. 65, pp. 190- 215.

SIVOPLYAS, Аntonio Valentina. 2018. Zarubezhnyj opyt normativnogo zakrepleniya mer yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti politicheskikh partij. In: Permskij yuridicheskij al’manakh. No 1, pp. 115-122. (In Russian).

SNEZHKO, Olga Аntoni. 2002. Konstitutsionnye obyazannosti Rossijskogo gosudarstva. In: Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn’. NO. 2, Vol. 7, pp. 41-56. (In Russian).

SOLOV’EV, Samuel George. 2003. Problemnye voprosy o yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti glav munitsipal’nykh obrazovanij. In: Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo. No 4, pp. 30-44. (In Russian).

VINOGRADOV, Vadim A. 2000. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost’: voprosy teorii i pravovoe regulirovanie. M. (In Russian).

WETTSTEIN, Florian. 2010. The Duty to Protect: Corporate Complicity, Political Responsibility, and Human Rights Advocacy. In: Journal of Business. Ethics volume 96, pp. 33-47.

ZRAZHEVSKOJ, Teodor Dmitry. 2002. Stanovlenie grazhdanskogo obshhestva v Rossii. Lichnost’, samoupravlenie, vlast’: Monografiya. Voronezh: 46. (In Russian).