Aplicação da metodologia de superfície de resposta para otimização de produtividade em milho (Zea mays L.)
Palavras-chave:
metodologia de superfície de resposta, otimização de rendimento, milho, Zea mays L.
Resumo
O objetivo deste estudo baseou-se na aplicação da metodologia de superfície de resposta (RSM) para a otimização da produtividade do milho (Zea mays L.). Foi utilizado o híbrido INIA SQ-1 e a Metodologia de Superfície de Resposta foi utilizada por meio do delineamento Box-Behnken (DBB), com o qualforam avaliados os seguintes fatores: densidade de plantas, dose de nitrogênio (N) e dose de fósforo (P) em trêsníveis cada; para a otimização das variáveis de resposta: "produtividade" (kg.ha-1) e o "número de grãos por metro quadrado" (g.m2). O método de superfície de resposta forneceu um modelo preditivo validado estatisticamente, que, por meio de ajustes, foi adaptado a um processo de otimização estabelecido. Para a variável "rendimento", foi encontrada uma resposta máxima com a aplicação de 150 kg.ha-1de N e 90 kg.ha-1 de P. Em relaçãoao número de grãos por metro quadrado (g.m2), o ótimo foi obtido com 75.000 plantas.ha-1e uma dose aplicada de kg.ha-1.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Barrios, M., & Basso, C. (2018). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield components and grain nutritional quality of six maize hybrids. Bioagro, 30(1), 39-48. http://ve.scielo.org/pdf/ba/v30n1/art04.pdf
Bouras, H., Bouaziz, A., Choukr-Allah, R., Hirich, A., Devkota, K. & Bouazzama, B. (2021). Phosphorus fertilization enhances productivity of forage corn (Zea mays L.) Irrigated with Saline Water. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 10(12), 2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122608
Box, G. and Behnken, D. (1960). Some new three-level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics, 30 (1960), pp. 1-40.https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912
Erenstein, O., Jaleta, M., Sonder, K., Mottaleb, K., & Prasanna, B. M. (2022). Global maize production, consumption and trade: trends and R&D implications. Food Security, 14, 1295–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01288-7
FAO-ESS. (2021). Estadísticas de Cultivos: Conceptos, Definiciones y Clasificaciones. División de Estadística de la FAO (ESS), Roma. https://www.fao.org/economic/the-statistics-division-ess/methodology/methodology-systems/crops-statistics-concepts-definitions-and-classifications/en/.
Ganugi, P., Fiorini, A., Rocchetti, G., Bonini, P., Tabaglio, V., & Lucini, L. (2022). A response surface methodology approach to improve nitrogen use efficiency in maize by an optimal mycorrhiza-to-Bacillus co-inoculation rate. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 956391. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.956391
Gómez, N., Palemón, F., Reyes, G., Hernández, C., Cantú, M., Juárez, P. &Ascencio, A. (2016). Rendimiento de grano y características fenotípicas de maíz: efecto de ambiente y dosis de fertilización. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas, 7(8), 1801–1813. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v7i8.93
Guo, J., Wang, Y., Fan, T.; Chen, X. & Cui, Z. (2016). Designing corn management strategies for high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy Journal 108(2):922-929. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0435
Jun, X., Rui-Zhi, X., Wang-Feng, Z., Ke-Ru, W., Peng, H., Bo, M., Ling, G. & Shao-Kun, L. (2017). Research progress on reduced lodging of high-yield and -density maize. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(12):2717-2725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61785-4
Martínez U., Raúl A., Kolln, O. & de Castro, G. (2017). Evaluación de la densidad de plantas, componentes fenológicos de producción y rendimiento de granos en diferentes materiales genéticos de maíz. Idesia (Arica), 35(3), 23-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292017005000401
Masood , T., Gul, R., Munsif, F., Jalal, F., Hussain, Z., Noreen, N., Khan, H., Din, N. & Khan, H. (2011). Effect of different phosphorus levels on the yield and yield components of maize. Sarhad, Journal of Agriculture, 27, 167-170.http://www.aup.edu.pk/sj_pdf/2-%20EFFECT%20OF%20DIFFERENT%20PHOSPHORUS%20LEVELS%20ON%20THE.pdf
Medina, A., Santiago, G., Soto, J. & Hernández, M. (2018). Yield of grain maize with and without fertilization in the state of Campeche. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas, (21), 4306-4316. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v0i21.1532
Montgomery, D. (2004). Desing and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley and Sons, Ed. 2.https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Design+and+Analysis+of+Experiments%2C+10th+Edition-p-9781119492443
Moreno, A., Brito, J., Reyes, J. & Contreras. V. (2017). Forage maize nutritional quality according to organic and inorganic fertilization. Scientia Agropecuaria, 8, 127-135, http://dx.doi.org/10.17268/sci. agropecu.2017.02.05.
Rodríguez, F., Sierra, M., Espinosa, A., Ventura, M., Barrón, S., Meza, P. & Del Rosario, J. (2021). Forage productivity in hybrid maize under different stocking densities and fertilizer doses. Terra Latinoamericana 39, 1-12, e676. https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v39i0.676.
Romero, T., Tamayo, L., Morales, M., Aparicio, J, Pérez, V., Peralta, M. & Cuervo, J. (2022). Growth and yield of purple kculli corn plants under different fertilization schemes. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 8(5), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050433
Sharif i, S., Raei, Y. &Weisany. W. (2014). Study of physiological growth indices in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under different plant densities. International Journal of Bioscience, 5, 100-109. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/5.3.100-109.
Tadeo, M., A. Espinosa, A., Canales, I., López, C., Zamudio, B, Turrent, A., Gómez, N., Sierra, M., Martínez, A., Valdivia, R. & Meza, P. (2020). Grain yield and population densities of new corn hybrids released by the INIFAP and UNAM for the High Valleys of Mexico. Terra Latinoamericana 38, 507-515. doi: https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v38i3.557
Tadeo, M., Espinosa, A., Chimal, N., Arteaga, I., Trejo, V., Canales, E., Sierra, M., Valdivia, R., Gómez, N., Palafox, A. & Zamudio, B. (2012). Densidad de población y fertilización en híbridos de maíz androestériles y fértiles. Terra Latinoamericana, 30, 157-164. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S018757792012000200157&script=sci_arttext
Torralbo, F., Boardman, D., Houx, J. H., III, & Fritschi, F. B. (2023). Soil mineral nitrogen content and grain yield with enhanced efficiency fertilizers in maize. Agronomy Journal, 115(2), 976–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21255
Vargas, M., Portillo, M., Brambila, J., Martínez, M. & Medina, S. (2021). Óptimos económicos de fertilizante en la producción de maíz blanco en Valles Altos. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 12(8), 1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i8.2685
Yaguas, O. (2017). Response surface methodology for the optimization of an agricultural production. Industrial Engineering Journal, 1, 205-222. https://doi.org/10.22320/S07179103/2017.13
Youngerman, C., o DiTommaso, A.: Curran, W., Mirsky, S. & Ryan, M. (2018). Corn Density Effect on Interseeded Cover Crops, Weeds, and Grain Yield. Agronomy Journal, 110, 2478–2487. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.01.0010
Bouras, H., Bouaziz, A., Choukr-Allah, R., Hirich, A., Devkota, K. & Bouazzama, B. (2021). Phosphorus fertilization enhances productivity of forage corn (Zea mays L.) Irrigated with Saline Water. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 10(12), 2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122608
Box, G. and Behnken, D. (1960). Some new three-level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics, 30 (1960), pp. 1-40.https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912
Erenstein, O., Jaleta, M., Sonder, K., Mottaleb, K., & Prasanna, B. M. (2022). Global maize production, consumption and trade: trends and R&D implications. Food Security, 14, 1295–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01288-7
FAO-ESS. (2021). Estadísticas de Cultivos: Conceptos, Definiciones y Clasificaciones. División de Estadística de la FAO (ESS), Roma. https://www.fao.org/economic/the-statistics-division-ess/methodology/methodology-systems/crops-statistics-concepts-definitions-and-classifications/en/.
Ganugi, P., Fiorini, A., Rocchetti, G., Bonini, P., Tabaglio, V., & Lucini, L. (2022). A response surface methodology approach to improve nitrogen use efficiency in maize by an optimal mycorrhiza-to-Bacillus co-inoculation rate. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 956391. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.956391
Gómez, N., Palemón, F., Reyes, G., Hernández, C., Cantú, M., Juárez, P. &Ascencio, A. (2016). Rendimiento de grano y características fenotípicas de maíz: efecto de ambiente y dosis de fertilización. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas, 7(8), 1801–1813. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v7i8.93
Guo, J., Wang, Y., Fan, T.; Chen, X. & Cui, Z. (2016). Designing corn management strategies for high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy Journal 108(2):922-929. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0435
Jun, X., Rui-Zhi, X., Wang-Feng, Z., Ke-Ru, W., Peng, H., Bo, M., Ling, G. & Shao-Kun, L. (2017). Research progress on reduced lodging of high-yield and -density maize. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(12):2717-2725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61785-4
Martínez U., Raúl A., Kolln, O. & de Castro, G. (2017). Evaluación de la densidad de plantas, componentes fenológicos de producción y rendimiento de granos en diferentes materiales genéticos de maíz. Idesia (Arica), 35(3), 23-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292017005000401
Masood , T., Gul, R., Munsif, F., Jalal, F., Hussain, Z., Noreen, N., Khan, H., Din, N. & Khan, H. (2011). Effect of different phosphorus levels on the yield and yield components of maize. Sarhad, Journal of Agriculture, 27, 167-170.http://www.aup.edu.pk/sj_pdf/2-%20EFFECT%20OF%20DIFFERENT%20PHOSPHORUS%20LEVELS%20ON%20THE.pdf
Medina, A., Santiago, G., Soto, J. & Hernández, M. (2018). Yield of grain maize with and without fertilization in the state of Campeche. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas, (21), 4306-4316. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v0i21.1532
Montgomery, D. (2004). Desing and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley and Sons, Ed. 2.https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Design+and+Analysis+of+Experiments%2C+10th+Edition-p-9781119492443
Moreno, A., Brito, J., Reyes, J. & Contreras. V. (2017). Forage maize nutritional quality according to organic and inorganic fertilization. Scientia Agropecuaria, 8, 127-135, http://dx.doi.org/10.17268/sci. agropecu.2017.02.05.
Rodríguez, F., Sierra, M., Espinosa, A., Ventura, M., Barrón, S., Meza, P. & Del Rosario, J. (2021). Forage productivity in hybrid maize under different stocking densities and fertilizer doses. Terra Latinoamericana 39, 1-12, e676. https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v39i0.676.
Romero, T., Tamayo, L., Morales, M., Aparicio, J, Pérez, V., Peralta, M. & Cuervo, J. (2022). Growth and yield of purple kculli corn plants under different fertilization schemes. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 8(5), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050433
Sharif i, S., Raei, Y. &Weisany. W. (2014). Study of physiological growth indices in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under different plant densities. International Journal of Bioscience, 5, 100-109. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/5.3.100-109.
Tadeo, M., A. Espinosa, A., Canales, I., López, C., Zamudio, B, Turrent, A., Gómez, N., Sierra, M., Martínez, A., Valdivia, R. & Meza, P. (2020). Grain yield and population densities of new corn hybrids released by the INIFAP and UNAM for the High Valleys of Mexico. Terra Latinoamericana 38, 507-515. doi: https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v38i3.557
Tadeo, M., Espinosa, A., Chimal, N., Arteaga, I., Trejo, V., Canales, E., Sierra, M., Valdivia, R., Gómez, N., Palafox, A. & Zamudio, B. (2012). Densidad de población y fertilización en híbridos de maíz androestériles y fértiles. Terra Latinoamericana, 30, 157-164. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S018757792012000200157&script=sci_arttext
Torralbo, F., Boardman, D., Houx, J. H., III, & Fritschi, F. B. (2023). Soil mineral nitrogen content and grain yield with enhanced efficiency fertilizers in maize. Agronomy Journal, 115(2), 976–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21255
Vargas, M., Portillo, M., Brambila, J., Martínez, M. & Medina, S. (2021). Óptimos económicos de fertilizante en la producción de maíz blanco en Valles Altos. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 12(8), 1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i8.2685
Yaguas, O. (2017). Response surface methodology for the optimization of an agricultural production. Industrial Engineering Journal, 1, 205-222. https://doi.org/10.22320/S07179103/2017.13
Youngerman, C., o DiTommaso, A.: Curran, W., Mirsky, S. & Ryan, M. (2018). Corn Density Effect on Interseeded Cover Crops, Weeds, and Grain Yield. Agronomy Journal, 110, 2478–2487. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.01.0010
Publicado
2023-11-29
Como Citar
Montaña, R., Roco-Videla, Ángel, Maureira-Carsalade, N., Flores, S., & Nieves, A. (2023). Aplicação da metodologia de superfície de resposta para otimização de produtividade em milho (Zea mays L.). Revista Da Faculdade De Agronomia Da Universidade De Zulia, 40(4), e234035. Obtido de https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/agronomia/article/view/41147
Edição
Secção
Produção Vegetal
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Román Montaña, Ángel Roco-Videla, Nelson Maureira-Carsalade, Ana Nieves, Sergio Flores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
