Inclusão de pupas de mosca-das-frutas Anastrepha ludens em rações avícolas com adição de enzimas digestivas e levedura
Palavras-chave:
Alimentos, probáticos, protéases, subprodutos de proteínas
Resumo
No México, a carne de frango representa 24,8 % da proteína consumida. Na busca por fontes proteicas que atendam a essa demanda, o uso de insetos tem se mostrado de potencial interesse. Para reduzir o efeito dos componentes que afetam a absorção de nutrientes, aditivos como enzimas digestivas e microrganismos têm sido utilizados. O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar o ganho de peso de aves (Gallus gallus domesticus) alimentadas com dietas formuladas com pupa de mosca-das-frutas (Anastrepha ludens), enzimas digestivas e levedura (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Os grupos foram estabelecidos de forma completamente aleatória com diferentes inclusões de pupas de mosca 0 %, 12 %, 14 % e 16 %, respetivamente, e diferenças significativas foram encontradas (p<0,05). O grupo com 14 % de proteína foi o que apresentou maior ganho de peso durante o experimento e a segunda fase utilizou enzimas digestivas e Saccharomyces cerevisiae e verificou-se que o tratamento 3: 14 % de Anastrepha ludens pupa + 200 UI de Protease + 1502 UI de Amilase + 80 UI de Celulase + 62 UI de Lipase + 40 UI de Pectinase + 8,88x109 UFC de S. cerevisiae / 100 g de ração apresentaram diferenças (p<0,05) e os melhores resultados no ganho de peso das aves. Conclui-se que a inclusão de 14 % de pupa de mosca nas rações promove o ganho de peso de Gallus gallus domesticus com a adição de enzimas digestivas e S. cerevisiae.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Adebiyi, O. A., Makanjuola, B. A., Bankole, T. O., y Adeyori, A. S. (2012). Yeast Culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Supplementation: Effect on the Performance and Gut Morphology of Broiler Birds. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Biological Sciences, 12: 25-29. https://cutt.ly/xnsSNVD
Arce, M. J., Ávila, G. E., y López, C. C. (2008). Comportamiento productivo y cambios morfológicos en vellosidades intestinales del pollo de engorda a 21 días de edad con el uso de paredes celulares de Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Notas de investigación. Revista Veterinaria México, 39: 223-228. https://cutt.ly/ansXGyP
Barroso, F. G., Haro, C. de, Sánchez, M. M. J., Venegas, E., Martínez, S. A., y Pérez B. C. (2014). The potential of various insect species for use as food for fish. Aquaculture, 422: 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.12.024
Bedford, M. R. y Partridge, G. G. (2001). Enzymes in farm animal nutrition. An effect of digestive tract conditions, feed processing and ingredients on response to NSP enzymes. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 85, 333-334. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2001.0335b.x
Bovera, F., Loponte R., Marono S., Piccolo, G., Parisi G., Laconisi, V., y Nizza, A. (2016). Use of larvae meal as protein source in broiler diet: Effect on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass and meat traits. Journal of Animal Science, 94, 639-647. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9201
Carvajal, J. J. G., y Oviedo O. E. (2014). Efecto de una serina proteasa en las dietas con el aumento de los niveles de inclusión de sorgo en el rendimiento y la digestibilidad de nutrientes en pollos de engorde. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal, 7: 43-54. https://cutt.ly/nns1yDy
Cho, J. H., Zhao, P., y Kim, I. (2012). Effects of Emulsifier and Multi-enzyme in Different Energy Densitydiet on Growth Performance, Blood Profiles, and Relative Organ Weight in Broiler Chickens. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4, 161-168. https://doi.org/10.5539/JAS.V4N10P161
Choct, M., Y. Dersjant-Li, J. McLeish, M. Peisker. 2010. Soy oligosaccharides and soluble non-starch polysaccharides: a review of digestion, nutritive and anti-nutritive effects in pigs and poultry. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 23(10): 1386-1398. https://cutt.ly/Fns1CrZ
De Marco, M., Martínez, S., Hernandez, F., Madrid, J., Gai, F., Rotolo, L., Belforti, M., Bergero, D., Katz, H., Dabbou, S., Kovitvadhi, A., Zoccarato, I., Gasco, L., y Schiavone, A. (2015). Nutritional value of two insect larval meals (Tenebrio molitor and Hermetia illucens) for broiler chickens: Apparent nutrient digestibility, apparent ileal amino acid digestibility and apparent metabolizable energy. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 209, 211-218. https://cutt.ly/Wns19Lo
Dalólio, F. S., Moreira, J., Vaz, D. P., Albino, L. F. T., Valadares, L. R., Pires, A. V. y Pinheiro S. R. F. (2016). Exogenous enzymes in diets for broilers. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 17, 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402016000200003
Elghandour, M., Tan, Z., Abu Hafsa, S., Adegbeye, M., Greiner, R., Ugbogu, E., Cedillo Monroy, J. y Salem, A. (2020). Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a probiotic feed additive to non and pseudo‐ruminant feeding: a review. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 128, 658-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14416
FAO. (2015). Food and agricultural organization. Panorama de la inseguridad alimentaria en América latina y el Caribe. https://cutt.ly/gns0l1M
FAO. (2013). Food and agricultural organization. Disponibilidad de piensos para aves en países en desarrollo. https://cutt.ly/pns0mx5
Hajati, H. (2010). Effects of Enzyme Supplementation on Performance, Carcass characteristics, Carcass Composition and Some Blood Parameters of Broiler Chicken. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 5, 221-227. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2010.221.227
Hassanein, S.M., y Soliman, N.K. (2010). Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) adding to diets on intestinal microflora and performance of Hy-line layers hens. Journal of American Science, 6, 159-169. https://doi.org/10.7537/marsjas061110.21
Hristakieva, P., Mincheva, N., Oblakova, M., Lalev, M., e Ivanova, I. (2014). Effect of genotype on production traits in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science, 47, 19-24. https://cutt.ly/Vns0TPk
Hwangbo, J., Hong, E.C.,Jang, A., Kang, H.K., Oh, J.S., Kim, B.W., Park, B.S. (2009). Utilization of house fly-maggots, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens. Journal of Environmental Biology, 30, 609-614. PMID: 20120505.
Hwangbo, J., Hong, E. C., Jang, A., Kang, H. K., Oh, J. S., Kim B. W., y Park, B. S. (2009). Utilization of house fly-maggots, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens. Journal of environmental biology, 30, 609–614. PMID: 20120505 https://cutt.ly/Tns9AHc
Józefiak, D. y Engberg, R.M. (2015). Insects as poultry feed. In: Světová drůbežářská vědecká společnost., & Světová drůbežářská vědecká společnost. (Eds.). Proceedings: 20th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition : 24-27 August 2015, Prague, Czech Republic. https://cutt.ly/Zns9FOu
Kouřimská, L., y Adámková, A. (2016). Nutritional and sensory quality of edible insects. Nutrition and Food Science Journal, 4, 22-26: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfs.2016.07.001
Khan, S. H., Atif, M., Mukhtar, N., Rehman, A., y Fareed, G. (2011). Effects of supplementation of multi-enzyme and multi-species probiotic on production performance, egg quality, cholesterol level and immune system in laying hens. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 39, 386-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2011.621538
Kiarie, E., Romero, L.F., y Nyachoti, C.M. (2013). The role of added feed enzymes in promoting gut health in swine and poultry. Nutrition Research Review, 26, 71-88. PMID: 23639548 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422413000048
Kiros, T.G, Gaydos, J., Corley, R., Berghaus, R., y Hofacre, C. (2019). Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast products in reducing direct colonization and horizontal transmission of Salmonella Heidelberg in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 28, 23–30. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfy012
González, A. J. M., Jiménez, M. E., González, S. D., Lázaro, R., Mateos, G. G. (2010). Effect of inclusion of oat hulls and sugar beet pulp in the diet on productive performance and digestive traits of broilers from 1 to 42 days of age. Animal Feed Science Technology, 162, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.08.010
Guida, N., Mesplet, M., Kotsias, F., González, S., Bustos, C., Laiño, M., Franco, P., Picos, J., y Mascolo, M. (2015). Evaluación del efecto de Saccharomyces cerevisiae sobre E. coli en la cría de pollos. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria, 16, 1-8. https://cutt.ly/Tns3aDx
Medina, L. S. 2012. El huerto familiar del sureste de México. In perfil productivo y problemática sanitaria en la cría de animales domésticos en hogares campesinos e indígenas de Chiapas. 1ra ed. Mariaca, R. M. p.245-267.
Méndez D., A. D., Cortes C., A. C., Fuente M., B., López C., C. y Ávila C., E. (2009). Efecto de un complejo enzimático en dietas sorgo+soya sobre la digestibilidad ileal de aminoácidos, energía metabolizable y productividad en pollos. Técnica Pecuaria en México, 47(1), 15-25. https://cutt.ly/6ns3jEJ
Mulisa Faji Dida. (2016). Review Paper on Enzyme Supplementation in Poultry Ration. International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry, 1, 1-7. https://cutt.ly/GnRzvPr
National Research Council. 1984. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry: Eighth Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/19397
Nmx-f-083-1986. Alimentos. Determinación de humedad en productos alimenticios. Norma Mexicana. https://cutt.ly/Ans31UE
Nmx-f-066-s-1978. Determinación de cenizas en alimentos. Norma Mexicana. https://cutt.ly/9ns34k9
Nmx-f-089-s-1978. Determinación de extracto etéreo (método soxhlet) en alimentos. Norma mexicana. https://cutt.ly/Xns3783
NOM-F-68-S-1980. Alimentos Determinación de Proteínas. Norma Oficial Mexicana. https://cutt.ly/gns36l5
NOM-F-90-S-1978. Determinación de Fibra Cruda en Alimentos. Norma oficial mexicana. https://cutt.ly/qns8wlh
Ogbuewu I. P, Okoro, V. M, Mbajiorgu, E. F, y Mbajiorgu, C. A (2018). Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and its effect on production indices of livestock and poultry—a review. Comparative Clinical pathology. PP 1-9: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-018-2862-7
Oonincx, D. G. A. B. y Finke, M. D. (2020). Nutritional value of insects and ways to manipulate their composition. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. ISSN 2352-4588 online, https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0050
Pieterse, E. y Pretorius, Q. (2014). Nutritional evaluation of dried larvae and pupae meal of the housefly (Musca domestica) using chemical-and broiler-based biological assays. Animal Production Science, 54, 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12370
Pretorius, Q. (2011). The evaluation of larvae of Musca domestica (common house fly) as protein source for broiler production. Doctoral dissertation. Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch University. https://cutt.ly/Uns8iqS
Reyes, S. N., Piad, B. R., González, N. H. D. y Ríos, M. (2014). Rendimiento de la canal y morfometría del tracto gastrointestinal de broilers suplementados con pared celular de levadura. Revista Científica La Calera, 14, 33-37. https://cutt.ly/wns8acd
Romero, M. H., J. A. Sánchez, J. F. Moncayo. (2014). Evaluación de la mortalidad y de las lesiones traumáticas en pollo de engorde bajo condiciones de sacrificio comercial. Rev. Biosalud, 13(1): 30-36. https://cutt.ly/7ns8fw5
Rumpold, B. A., y Schlüter, O. K. (2013). Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 57, 802–823. PMID: 23471778 https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201200735
Schiavone, A., De Marco, M., Martínez, S., Dabbou, S., Renna, M., Madrid, J., Hernández, F., Rotolo, L., Costa, P., Gai, F., y Gasco, L. (2017). Nutritional value of a partially defatted and a highly defatted black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) meal for broiler chickens: apparent nutrient digestibility, apparent metabolizable energy and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility. Journal of Animal Science Biotechnology, 8, 1-9. PMID: 28603614 PMCID: PMC5465574 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0181-5
SAGARPA. 2015. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Proyecciones para el Sector Agropecuario de México, 09-18. https://cutt.ly/Pns8kEA
SAGARPA. 2007. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Programa Especial para la Seguridad Alimentaria, 2-10.
Sánchez, S., y Torres, R. J. (2013). Diagnóstico y tipificación de unidades familiares con y sin gallinas de traspatio en una comunidad de Huatusco, Veracruz (México). Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria, 16, 64-74. https://cutt.ly/Ens85N8
Sancho, D., Fernández, L. S., y Álvarez, M. G. (2015). Insectos y alimentación. Larvas de Rhynchophorus palmarum L, un alimento de los pobladores de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. Entomotropica 30, 135-149. https://cutt.ly/7ns4wfT
SEDESOL. Secretaría de Desarrollo Social del Gobierno de la República Mexicana. 2010. https://cutt.ly/Sns4txG
Shareef, A. M., y Al-Dabbagh, A. S. A. (2009). Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance of broiler. Iraqi Journal Veterinary Science, 23, 23-29. Proceedings of the 5th Scientific Conference, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul https://cutt.ly/Hns4iO7
UNA. 2015. Unión Nacional de Avicultores. Situación de la avicultura en México. https://cutt.ly/undtCWn
USDA. 2015. United States Department of Agriculture. Panorama agroalimentario del maíz. 3-26. https://cutt.ly/kndtZ4V
Veldkamp, T., Van Duinkerken, G., Van Huis, A., Lakemond, C., Ottevanger, E., Bosch, G., y Van Boekel, T. (2012). Insects as a Sustainable Feed Ingredient in Pig and Poultry Diets: a Feasibility Study. No. 638. Wageningen UR Livestock Research. Netherlands. https://cutt.ly/Kndyszq
Van Huis, A., Van Itterbeeck, J., Klunder, H., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G., y Vantomme, P. (2013). Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security. Rome, Italy. 171: 123-125. https://cutt.ly/8ndoeHo
Zhang, B., Guo, Y., y Wang, Z. (2008). The modulating effect of beta-1, 3/1, 6-glucan supplementation in the diet on performance and immunological responses of broiler chickens. Asian Australas. Journal of Animal Science, 21, 237-244. https://cutt.ly/MndyvYm
Arce, M. J., Ávila, G. E., y López, C. C. (2008). Comportamiento productivo y cambios morfológicos en vellosidades intestinales del pollo de engorda a 21 días de edad con el uso de paredes celulares de Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Notas de investigación. Revista Veterinaria México, 39: 223-228. https://cutt.ly/ansXGyP
Barroso, F. G., Haro, C. de, Sánchez, M. M. J., Venegas, E., Martínez, S. A., y Pérez B. C. (2014). The potential of various insect species for use as food for fish. Aquaculture, 422: 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.12.024
Bedford, M. R. y Partridge, G. G. (2001). Enzymes in farm animal nutrition. An effect of digestive tract conditions, feed processing and ingredients on response to NSP enzymes. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 85, 333-334. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2001.0335b.x
Bovera, F., Loponte R., Marono S., Piccolo, G., Parisi G., Laconisi, V., y Nizza, A. (2016). Use of larvae meal as protein source in broiler diet: Effect on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass and meat traits. Journal of Animal Science, 94, 639-647. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9201
Carvajal, J. J. G., y Oviedo O. E. (2014). Efecto de una serina proteasa en las dietas con el aumento de los niveles de inclusión de sorgo en el rendimiento y la digestibilidad de nutrientes en pollos de engorde. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal, 7: 43-54. https://cutt.ly/nns1yDy
Cho, J. H., Zhao, P., y Kim, I. (2012). Effects of Emulsifier and Multi-enzyme in Different Energy Densitydiet on Growth Performance, Blood Profiles, and Relative Organ Weight in Broiler Chickens. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4, 161-168. https://doi.org/10.5539/JAS.V4N10P161
Choct, M., Y. Dersjant-Li, J. McLeish, M. Peisker. 2010. Soy oligosaccharides and soluble non-starch polysaccharides: a review of digestion, nutritive and anti-nutritive effects in pigs and poultry. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 23(10): 1386-1398. https://cutt.ly/Fns1CrZ
De Marco, M., Martínez, S., Hernandez, F., Madrid, J., Gai, F., Rotolo, L., Belforti, M., Bergero, D., Katz, H., Dabbou, S., Kovitvadhi, A., Zoccarato, I., Gasco, L., y Schiavone, A. (2015). Nutritional value of two insect larval meals (Tenebrio molitor and Hermetia illucens) for broiler chickens: Apparent nutrient digestibility, apparent ileal amino acid digestibility and apparent metabolizable energy. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 209, 211-218. https://cutt.ly/Wns19Lo
Dalólio, F. S., Moreira, J., Vaz, D. P., Albino, L. F. T., Valadares, L. R., Pires, A. V. y Pinheiro S. R. F. (2016). Exogenous enzymes in diets for broilers. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, 17, 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402016000200003
Elghandour, M., Tan, Z., Abu Hafsa, S., Adegbeye, M., Greiner, R., Ugbogu, E., Cedillo Monroy, J. y Salem, A. (2020). Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a probiotic feed additive to non and pseudo‐ruminant feeding: a review. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 128, 658-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14416
FAO. (2015). Food and agricultural organization. Panorama de la inseguridad alimentaria en América latina y el Caribe. https://cutt.ly/gns0l1M
FAO. (2013). Food and agricultural organization. Disponibilidad de piensos para aves en países en desarrollo. https://cutt.ly/pns0mx5
Hajati, H. (2010). Effects of Enzyme Supplementation on Performance, Carcass characteristics, Carcass Composition and Some Blood Parameters of Broiler Chicken. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 5, 221-227. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2010.221.227
Hassanein, S.M., y Soliman, N.K. (2010). Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) adding to diets on intestinal microflora and performance of Hy-line layers hens. Journal of American Science, 6, 159-169. https://doi.org/10.7537/marsjas061110.21
Hristakieva, P., Mincheva, N., Oblakova, M., Lalev, M., e Ivanova, I. (2014). Effect of genotype on production traits in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science, 47, 19-24. https://cutt.ly/Vns0TPk
Hwangbo, J., Hong, E.C.,Jang, A., Kang, H.K., Oh, J.S., Kim, B.W., Park, B.S. (2009). Utilization of house fly-maggots, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens. Journal of Environmental Biology, 30, 609-614. PMID: 20120505.
Hwangbo, J., Hong, E. C., Jang, A., Kang, H. K., Oh, J. S., Kim B. W., y Park, B. S. (2009). Utilization of house fly-maggots, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens. Journal of environmental biology, 30, 609–614. PMID: 20120505 https://cutt.ly/Tns9AHc
Józefiak, D. y Engberg, R.M. (2015). Insects as poultry feed. In: Světová drůbežářská vědecká společnost., & Světová drůbežářská vědecká společnost. (Eds.). Proceedings: 20th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition : 24-27 August 2015, Prague, Czech Republic. https://cutt.ly/Zns9FOu
Kouřimská, L., y Adámková, A. (2016). Nutritional and sensory quality of edible insects. Nutrition and Food Science Journal, 4, 22-26: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nfs.2016.07.001
Khan, S. H., Atif, M., Mukhtar, N., Rehman, A., y Fareed, G. (2011). Effects of supplementation of multi-enzyme and multi-species probiotic on production performance, egg quality, cholesterol level and immune system in laying hens. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 39, 386-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2011.621538
Kiarie, E., Romero, L.F., y Nyachoti, C.M. (2013). The role of added feed enzymes in promoting gut health in swine and poultry. Nutrition Research Review, 26, 71-88. PMID: 23639548 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422413000048
Kiros, T.G, Gaydos, J., Corley, R., Berghaus, R., y Hofacre, C. (2019). Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast products in reducing direct colonization and horizontal transmission of Salmonella Heidelberg in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 28, 23–30. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfy012
González, A. J. M., Jiménez, M. E., González, S. D., Lázaro, R., Mateos, G. G. (2010). Effect of inclusion of oat hulls and sugar beet pulp in the diet on productive performance and digestive traits of broilers from 1 to 42 days of age. Animal Feed Science Technology, 162, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.08.010
Guida, N., Mesplet, M., Kotsias, F., González, S., Bustos, C., Laiño, M., Franco, P., Picos, J., y Mascolo, M. (2015). Evaluación del efecto de Saccharomyces cerevisiae sobre E. coli en la cría de pollos. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria, 16, 1-8. https://cutt.ly/Tns3aDx
Medina, L. S. 2012. El huerto familiar del sureste de México. In perfil productivo y problemática sanitaria en la cría de animales domésticos en hogares campesinos e indígenas de Chiapas. 1ra ed. Mariaca, R. M. p.245-267.
Méndez D., A. D., Cortes C., A. C., Fuente M., B., López C., C. y Ávila C., E. (2009). Efecto de un complejo enzimático en dietas sorgo+soya sobre la digestibilidad ileal de aminoácidos, energía metabolizable y productividad en pollos. Técnica Pecuaria en México, 47(1), 15-25. https://cutt.ly/6ns3jEJ
Mulisa Faji Dida. (2016). Review Paper on Enzyme Supplementation in Poultry Ration. International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry, 1, 1-7. https://cutt.ly/GnRzvPr
National Research Council. 1984. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry: Eighth Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/19397
Nmx-f-083-1986. Alimentos. Determinación de humedad en productos alimenticios. Norma Mexicana. https://cutt.ly/Ans31UE
Nmx-f-066-s-1978. Determinación de cenizas en alimentos. Norma Mexicana. https://cutt.ly/9ns34k9
Nmx-f-089-s-1978. Determinación de extracto etéreo (método soxhlet) en alimentos. Norma mexicana. https://cutt.ly/Xns3783
NOM-F-68-S-1980. Alimentos Determinación de Proteínas. Norma Oficial Mexicana. https://cutt.ly/gns36l5
NOM-F-90-S-1978. Determinación de Fibra Cruda en Alimentos. Norma oficial mexicana. https://cutt.ly/qns8wlh
Ogbuewu I. P, Okoro, V. M, Mbajiorgu, E. F, y Mbajiorgu, C. A (2018). Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and its effect on production indices of livestock and poultry—a review. Comparative Clinical pathology. PP 1-9: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-018-2862-7
Oonincx, D. G. A. B. y Finke, M. D. (2020). Nutritional value of insects and ways to manipulate their composition. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. ISSN 2352-4588 online, https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0050
Pieterse, E. y Pretorius, Q. (2014). Nutritional evaluation of dried larvae and pupae meal of the housefly (Musca domestica) using chemical-and broiler-based biological assays. Animal Production Science, 54, 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12370
Pretorius, Q. (2011). The evaluation of larvae of Musca domestica (common house fly) as protein source for broiler production. Doctoral dissertation. Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch University. https://cutt.ly/Uns8iqS
Reyes, S. N., Piad, B. R., González, N. H. D. y Ríos, M. (2014). Rendimiento de la canal y morfometría del tracto gastrointestinal de broilers suplementados con pared celular de levadura. Revista Científica La Calera, 14, 33-37. https://cutt.ly/wns8acd
Romero, M. H., J. A. Sánchez, J. F. Moncayo. (2014). Evaluación de la mortalidad y de las lesiones traumáticas en pollo de engorde bajo condiciones de sacrificio comercial. Rev. Biosalud, 13(1): 30-36. https://cutt.ly/7ns8fw5
Rumpold, B. A., y Schlüter, O. K. (2013). Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 57, 802–823. PMID: 23471778 https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201200735
Schiavone, A., De Marco, M., Martínez, S., Dabbou, S., Renna, M., Madrid, J., Hernández, F., Rotolo, L., Costa, P., Gai, F., y Gasco, L. (2017). Nutritional value of a partially defatted and a highly defatted black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) meal for broiler chickens: apparent nutrient digestibility, apparent metabolizable energy and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility. Journal of Animal Science Biotechnology, 8, 1-9. PMID: 28603614 PMCID: PMC5465574 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0181-5
SAGARPA. 2015. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Proyecciones para el Sector Agropecuario de México, 09-18. https://cutt.ly/Pns8kEA
SAGARPA. 2007. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Programa Especial para la Seguridad Alimentaria, 2-10.
Sánchez, S., y Torres, R. J. (2013). Diagnóstico y tipificación de unidades familiares con y sin gallinas de traspatio en una comunidad de Huatusco, Veracruz (México). Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria, 16, 64-74. https://cutt.ly/Ens85N8
Sancho, D., Fernández, L. S., y Álvarez, M. G. (2015). Insectos y alimentación. Larvas de Rhynchophorus palmarum L, un alimento de los pobladores de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana. Entomotropica 30, 135-149. https://cutt.ly/7ns4wfT
SEDESOL. Secretaría de Desarrollo Social del Gobierno de la República Mexicana. 2010. https://cutt.ly/Sns4txG
Shareef, A. M., y Al-Dabbagh, A. S. A. (2009). Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance of broiler. Iraqi Journal Veterinary Science, 23, 23-29. Proceedings of the 5th Scientific Conference, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul https://cutt.ly/Hns4iO7
UNA. 2015. Unión Nacional de Avicultores. Situación de la avicultura en México. https://cutt.ly/undtCWn
USDA. 2015. United States Department of Agriculture. Panorama agroalimentario del maíz. 3-26. https://cutt.ly/kndtZ4V
Veldkamp, T., Van Duinkerken, G., Van Huis, A., Lakemond, C., Ottevanger, E., Bosch, G., y Van Boekel, T. (2012). Insects as a Sustainable Feed Ingredient in Pig and Poultry Diets: a Feasibility Study. No. 638. Wageningen UR Livestock Research. Netherlands. https://cutt.ly/Kndyszq
Van Huis, A., Van Itterbeeck, J., Klunder, H., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G., y Vantomme, P. (2013). Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security. Rome, Italy. 171: 123-125. https://cutt.ly/8ndoeHo
Zhang, B., Guo, Y., y Wang, Z. (2008). The modulating effect of beta-1, 3/1, 6-glucan supplementation in the diet on performance and immunological responses of broiler chickens. Asian Australas. Journal of Animal Science, 21, 237-244. https://cutt.ly/MndyvYm
Publicado
2021-12-16
Como Citar
López-García, J. A., Grajales-Conesa, J., Albores-Flores, V. J., Torres de los Santos, R., Ramón-Javier, L. A., & Cordova-Albores, L. C. (2021). Inclusão de pupas de mosca-das-frutas Anastrepha ludens em rações avícolas com adição de enzimas digestivas e levedura. Revista Da Faculdade De Agronomia Da Universidade De Zulia, 39(1), e223903. Obtido de https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/agronomia/article/view/37387
Edição
Secção
Produção Animal
Direitos de Autor (c) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
