TEACHING STRATEGY OF ECOSYSTEMS IN JAKARTA FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

Estrategia de enseñanza de los ecosistemas en Jakarta para estudiantes de escuela primaria

  • C. WIBISONO Batam University, Riau Islands
  • A.F. ASSA Krida Wacana Christian University
  • F.J. RUMAMBI Institute Bisnis & Multimedia Asmi at Jakarta
Palabras clave: Learning strategy, ecosystem, student

Resumen

El objetivo de esta investigación es determinar los factores que causan degradación ambiental y daño a los ecosistemas. Las estrategias de aprendizaje para el conocimiento de los estudiantes sobre el ecosistema es una necesidad. La investigación se llevó a cabo en estudiantes de SD Kalisah Jakarta. Los resultados mostraron que: (1) El conocimiento de los estudiantes sobre los ecosistemas enseñados por estrategias al aire libre fue mayor que las estrategias de interior, (2) Comprensión de los ecosistemas que sienten los estudiantes en términos de utilización, mantenimiento y desarrollo, lo que garantiza una gestión ambiental sostenible. Aprender sobre ecosistemas permite a los estudiantes equiparse con conocimientos e información sobre cómo mantener el equilibrio del ecosistema, tanto ahora como en el futuro.

Citas

AGUSTA, A, R (2018). “Improving the student’s cooperation and environmental care skill using outdoor learning strategy outbound variation”. Innovation and Technology in Education (IC-CITE 2018), 33, pp. 10-17.

BAHAR, M (2003). “Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change strategies”. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), pp. 55-64.

BEERWINKLE, A, L, WIJEKUMAR, K, WALPOLE, S, & AGUIS, R (2018). “An analysis of the ecological components within a text structure intervention”. Reading and Writing, 31(9), pp. 2041-2064.

BISWAS, G, LEELAWONG, K, SCHWARTZ, D, VYE, N, & THE TEACHABLE AGENTS GROUP AT VANDERBILT (2005). “Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software”. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3), pp. 363-392.

BRODY, M, J (1994). “Student science knowledge related to ecological crises”. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), pp. 421-435.

CHO, Y, & LEE, D (2018). “Love honey, hate honey bees’: reviving biophilia of elementary school students through environmental education program”. Environmental Education Research, 24(3), pp. 445-460.

ÇOKADAR, H, & YILMAZ, G, C (2010). “Teaching ecosystems and matter cycles with creative drama activities”. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), pp. 80-89.

CUTTER-MACKENZIE, A, & SMITH, R (2003). “Ecological literacy: the ‘missing paradigm’in environmental education (part one)”. Environmental Education Research, 9(4), pp. 497-524.

DZIABENKO, O, & BUDNYK, O (2019). “Go-Lab ecosystem: Using online laboratories in a primary school”. In 11th annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 11(4), pp. 49-56.

FONSECA, D, CONDE, M, Á, & GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, F, J (2018). “Improving the information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all?”. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(2), pp. 229-245.

GROS, B, & GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, F, J (2016). “Future trends in the design strategies and technological affordances of e-learning”. Cognition and instruction, 36(3), pp. 28-46.

HARLOW, D, B, DWYER, H, A, HANSEN, A, K, IVELAND, A, O, & FRANKLIN, D, M (2018). “Ecological design-based research for computer science education: Affordances and effectivities for elementary school students”. Cognition and instruction, 36(3), pp. 224-246.

HILL, J, L, & NELSON, A (2011). “New technology, new pedagogy? Employing video podcasts in learning and teaching about exotic ecosystems”. Environmental Education Research, 17(3), pp. 393-408.

ICHSAN, I, Z, SIGIT, D, V, MIARSYAH, M, ALI, A, & SUWANDI, T (2020). “Implementation Supplementary Book of Green Consumerism: Improving Students HOTS in Environmental Learning”. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), pp. 227-237.

JACKSON, S, L, STRATFORD, S, J, KRAJCIK, J, & SOLOWAY, E (1994). “Making dynamic modeling accessible to precollege science students”. Interactive learning environments, 4(3), pp. 233-257.

JELADZE, E, PATA, K, & QUAICOE, J, S (2017). “Factors determining digital learning ecosystem smartness in schools”. IxD&A, 35, pp. 32-55.

KAMIL, P, A, UTAYA, S, & UTOMO, D, H (2020). “Improving disaster knowledge within high school students through geographic literacy”. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 43, pp. 101-111.

MCCAGG, E, C, & DANSEREAU, D, F (1991). “A convergent paradigm for examining knowledge mapping as a learning strategy”. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(6), pp. 317-324.

O’REILLY, T, WANG, Z, & SABATINI, J (2019). “How much knowledge is too little? When a lack of knowledge becomes a barrier to comprehension”. Psychological science, 30(9), pp. 1344-1351.

SUMARWATI, S, SUKARNO, S, ANINDYARINI, A, & LESTARI, D, W (2020). “Integration of traditional ecological knowledge in-to primary school learning”. retorika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 13(2), pp. 11-32.
Publicado
2021-06-18
Cómo citar
WIBISONO, C., ASSA, A., & RUMAMBI, F. (2021). TEACHING STRATEGY OF ECOSYSTEMS IN JAKARTA FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: Estrategia de enseñanza de los ecosistemas en Jakarta para estudiantes de escuela primaria. Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana, 26, 129-139. Recuperado a partir de https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/36110