Floristic Metaphor in French and Tatar Literary Texts
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study is devoted to the floristic units of the french and tatar language, which underwent a metaphorical transformation in artistic discourse. The aim of the study is to determine the most significant directions of metaphorical transfer, to identify the common and unique in the process of metaphorization in languages of different structure. The objects of study were floronyms - names of plants in French and Tatar languages, meronyms - names of parts of a plant, as well as lexical units indicating the stage of plant development. The results of the work can be applied in studies of lexicography, translation studies and language theory.
RESUMEN
Este estudio está dedicado a las unidades florísticas del idioma francés y tártaro, que sufrieron una transformación metafórica en el discurso artístico. El objetivo del estudio es determinar las direcciones más significativas de la transferencia metafórica, para identificar lo común y único en el proceso de metaforización en lenguajes de diferente estructura. Los objetos de estudio fueron florónimos: nombres de plantas en francés y tártaro, merónimos, nombres de partes de una planta, así como unidades léxicas que indican la etapa de desarrollo de la planta. Los resultados del trabajo pueden aplicarse en estudios de lexicografía, estudios de traducción y teoría del lenguaje.
References
ALEKSANDROVNA, VR (2020). “Precedent Phenomena with Sphere Source “Literature” in M. Stepnova’s Artistic Discourse.” Филологические науки, 13(7).
ARUTYUNOVA, ND (1990). “Metaphor and discourse // Theory of metaphor / under.” total ed. of N.D. Arutyunova and M.A. Zhurinskaya. M .: Progress.- S. 5-32.
DEBERRY, DA & PERRY, JE (2015). “Using the floristic quality concept to assess created and natural wetlands: ecological and management implications.” Ecological Indicators, 53, 247-257.
FARRIS, K (2020). “The Incorporeal Scientific Method: Gender, Hybridity, and the Rise of Material Science in American Literature”, 1840-1900.
GAFIYATOVA, E, SAMARKINA, N & SHELESTOVA, O (2016). “Phytonyms in the Tatar and English languages: comparative analysis”, Journal of Language and Literature, vol 7, № 2, pp. 146-149.
GALIEVA, NF & GALIULLINA, GR (2015). “Emotive IDIOMS tatar language as national mentality reflection” // Journal of Language and Literature, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 273-276, 2015.
GULOMOVNA, NG (2020). “IMPORTANCE OF TEXT INTERPRETATION IN INCOMPLETE SENTENCES.” Проблемы современной науки и образования, (2 (147)).
LAKOFF, G (1993). “The contemporary theory of metaphor // Metaphor and Thought / Andrew Ortony” (ed.) Second Edition – Cambridge University Press, 1998. – PP. 202-251.
LEDIN, P & MACHIN, D (2020). “Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis: How to Reveal Discourses of Health and Ethics in Food Packaging. Pauwels, L. and Mannay, D.” The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London Sage, 500-513.
MAMAEVA, A, GIZATULLINA, A, MINGAZOVA, R & AT AL. (2017). “Specific ways of expressing emotions in the Tatar and French languages”, Modern journal of language teaching methods, vol. 7, Iss. 12, pp. 84-89, 2017.
MCCARREN, F (2020). “One Dead at the Paris Opera Ballet: La Source 1866-2014.” Oxford University Press, USA.
MINGAZOVA RAUSHANIYA R, ANDRIANOVA NATALIA, S & OSTROUMOVA OLGA, F (2019). “The concept Garden in the French and Tatar literary discourse”//Turismo-estudios e praticas, Vol., Is 2, P. 1-7.
MOREIRA‐MUÑOZ, A (2007). “The Austral floristic realm revisited.” Journal of Biogeography, 34(10), 1649-1660.
NIKITIN, MV (2004). “«Extended Theses on Concepts», Questions of Cognitive Linguistics, No.” 1. S. 53-64.
SADYKOVA, AG & MINGAZOVA, RR (2020). “The functioning of the phytomorphic metaphor in the artistic discourse of the French and Tatar languages // Modern problems of science and education,” No. 6, 2013; URL: www.science-education.ru/ 113-11366 (accessed date: 05/05/2020).
SHERWANI, K & DIZAYI, S (2020). “RESISTING DOMINANT CULTURE IN THE LONELY LONDONER: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS.” International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 5(15), 1275-1279.
SIBGAEVA, F, ZAMALETDINOV, R & ZAMALETDINOVA, G (2015). “Reflection of tatar inner world through concepts”, Journal of Language and Literature, ISSN: 2078-0303, vol. 6, № 3, Iss.1, pp. 115-119.
SIBGATULLINA, G (2020). “Battle of the Books: Tatar Translations of the New Testament.” In Languages of Islam and Christianity in Post-Soviet Russia (pp. 145-166). Brill Rodopi.
TADZHIBAEVA, AA (2010). “Concept of conceptual metaphor.” [Electronic resource.] /A.A. Tadzhibaeva - URL: http://www.rusnauka.com/18_DNI_2010/Philologia/69429.doc.htm (accessed date: 05/03/2020).
VOLKOVA, VB, POSTNIKOVA, EG, OVCHAROVA, SV, MOISEEVA, SA & RUDAKOVA, TV (2018). “Concept in the Trans Textual Space of Artistic Discourse.” Literature Study Research Methodology. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 8(6), 13-31.