Cognitive Linguistic Approach to the Integrated Theory of Metaphor
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The various aspects of metaphor and its application are on the agenda of this debate. This article has resources to dozens of European and American metaphor studies and presents the results of their analytical overview. As a result, this analysis depicts a range of topical issues. One of them is the development of a theory of metaphor that will integrate various approaches (linguistic, cognitive, communicative, and pragmatic) to the study of the metaphor, reproducing the change of a cognitive-linguistic approach to the figurative language analysis. Several theories about the cognitive aspect of matter have been introduced.
RESUMEN
Los diversos aspectos de la metáfora y su aplicación están en la agenda de este debate. Este artículo tiene recursos para docenas de estudios de metáforas europeas y americanas y presenta los resultados de su descripción analítica. Como resultado, este análisis describe una variedad de temas de actualidad. Uno de ellos es el desarrollo de una teoría de la metáfora que integrará varios enfoques (lingüísticos, cognitivos, comunicativos y pragmáticos) al estudio de la metáfora, reproduciendo el cambio de un enfoque cognitivo-lingüístico al análisis del lenguaje figurativo. Se han introducido varias teorías sobre el aspecto cognitivo de la materia.
References
BARANOV, AN (2014). “Deskriptornaya Teoriya Metafory [Descriptor theory of metaphor]”. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury.
FAUCONNIER, G, & TURNER, M (1998). “Conceptual integration networks”. Cognitive science, 22(2), 133-187.
FAUCONNIER, G, & TURNER, M (2008). “The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities”. Basic Books.
GALIULINA, IR, SPIRIDONOV, AV, & BYIYK, IA (2019). “Peculiarities of verbal representation of a conceptual language image “night” in the poetic texts of Afanasy Afanasyevich Fet”. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), pp. 481-485.
GARIPOVA, EV, AYUPOVA, RA, & MARKOVA, EM (2019). “Verbalization of “family” as a cultural notion in the novels “war and peace” by l. Tolstoy and “in chancery” by J. Galsworthy”. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), pp. 486-490.
GIBBS JR, RW (Ed.). (2008). “The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought”. Cambridge University Press.
LAKOFF, G (1993). “The contemporary theory of metaphor”.
MINIKEEVA, AA, SADYKOVA, AG, & LAZZERINI, E (2019). “Conceptual blending in metaphors in the 2016 pre-election campaign”. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), pp. 281-285.
RITCHIE, LD (2013). “Metaphor”. Cambridge University Press. p. 230.
RUIZ DE MENDOZA IBÁÑEZ, FJ (2011). “A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor: Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics”. by Markus Tendahl: Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 282 pages, $105 (hardcover), ISBN 9780230227934.
SALAKHOVA, AR, BURTCEVA, TA, & BOGORODSKIY, VA (2019). “A book title as reflection and repercussion: conceptual analysis in a class”. Ad Alta-journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 9(2), pp. 102-104.
SEMINO, E, DEMJÉN, Z, & DEMMEN, J (2018). “An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer”. Applied linguistics, 39(5), pp. 625-645.
SOLNYSHKINA, M, & GAFIYATOVA, E (2014). “Modern forestry English: macro-and microstructure of low register dictionary”. Journal of Language and Literature, 5(4), pp. 220-224.
SPERBER, D, & WILSON, D (2008). “A deflationary account of metaphors”. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 84, p. 105.
STEEN, GJ (2011). “The contemporary theory of metaphor—now new and improved!”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 9(1), pp. 26-64.
STÖVER, H (2010). “Metaphor and relevance theory: a new hybrid model”.
TENDAHL, M, & GIBBS JR, RW (2008). “Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory”. Journal of pragmatics, 40(11), pp. 1823-1864.