Spiritual Independence of an Artist’s Personality in Postmodernity
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Using the example of Takeshi Kitano’s film Achilles and the Tortoise, the authors attempt to identify the criteria of artistry by answering the question whether the main character of the film is a true artist or a pathetic copyist. Carrying out a comparative analysis of Mathisu’s paintings and contemporary artworks represented by Paul Klee, Yves Klein, Pete Mondrian, and others, the authors testify both to the interpretation of the source and its reinterpretation. Such experience allows arguing that the character of the film is a creative person who does not lose its value outside the cinema.
RESUMEN
Utilizando el ejemplo de la película de Takeshi Kitano Aquiles y la tortuga, los autores intentan identificar el criterio del arte respondiendo a la pregunta de si el personaje principal de la película es un verdadero artista o un copista patético. Llevando a cabo un análisis comparativo de las pinturas de Mathisu y las obras de arte contemporáneo representadas por Paul Klee, Yves Klein, Pete Mondrian y otros, los autores dan testimonio tanto de la interpretación de la fuente original como de su reinterpretación. Tal experiencia permite argumentar que el personaje de la película es una persona creativa que no pierde su valor fuera del cine.
References
AKUTAGAWA, R (1974). “Flour of Hell”. Akudawa Ryunosuke (Short stories). Moscow: Publishing of Fiction. pp. 117-140.
BORODİNA, T, SİBGATULLİNA, A, & GİZATULLİNA, A (2019). “Developing creative thinking in future teachers as a topical issue of higher education”. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), pp. 226-245.
ECKERMAN, IP (1934). “Conversations with Goethe in the last years of his life”. Moscow: ACADEMIA. p. 965.
GABIDULLINA, F, GALIULLIN, R, KHAKIMOVA, I, & MANSUROV, z (2020). “Elitist education: Historical experience of the Russian and Tatar peoples”. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(1), pp. 267-280.
ILYIN, IA (1993). “On education in upcoming Russia”. Ilyin I.A. Sobr. Op. in 10 volumes. Moscow: Russian book. p. 478.
KHALIULLINA, LR, & SAVINA, NN (2020). “Content-related characteristics of the concept "research thinking of a teacher (bachelor)" and approaches to its study in Russia and abroad”. Talent Development and Excellence, 12(3), pp. 645-663.
KOROLEVA, SA (2015). “Edward Munch M: Direct Media, JSC Komsomolskaya Pravda Publishing House”. p. 72.
LOTMAN, YUM (1998). “Problems of semiotics and the way of modern cinema”. Lotman Yu. M. About art. St. Petersburg. pp. 365-372.
MAMARDASHVILI, MK (2019). “Conversations on thinking”. St. Petersburg: ABC-Atticus. p. 480.
PEASE, A (2018). “Body Language: The Most Authoritative Guide to Reading Thoughts”. Allan and Barbara Pease (translated from English by T.O. Novikova). Moscow: Eksmo. p. 496.
PICASSO, P (2019). “From the notes of Daniel-Henry Canweiler about conversations with Picasso (Electronic resource)”. URL: picasso-pablo.ru (accessed July 17, 2019).
PULIKOVA, LV (2015). “Pierre Bonnard”. Moscow: Direct Media, JSC Komsomolskaya Pravda Publishing House. p. 72.
SHCHEGLOVA, LV, & SAENKO, NR (2019). “Play Gogol: a postmodern interpretation of early Gogol in the series by E. Baranov”. Service Plus, 13(4). pp. 111-124.
VOLKOVA, PS (2019). “Pablo Picasso, Igor Stravinsky, and Georges Braque: a dialogue of initiates”. The musical almanac of Tomsk State University: a scientific and practical journal. Tomsk: TSU Publishing House, (8), pp. 48-58.