Correlation Between E-Government and Corruption Risks in Kazakhstan
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This article is an extension of the theme of e-government as a tool to struggle with corruption. E-government, enabling citizens to directly contact state authorities via the Internet, eliminates contact with officials, thereby reducing their permissive function and the risks of corruption, ensuring transparency and accountability. The purpose of this article is a comparative analysis of the development of e-government in different countries of Europe and Asia, as well as consideration of the correlation between the expansion of e-government functions and the reduction of corruption risks in Kazakhstan.
RESUMEN
Este artículo es una extensión del tema del gobierno electrónico como herramienta para luchar contra la corrupción. El gobierno electrónico, que permite a los ciudadanos contactar directamente a las autoridades estatales a través de Internet, elimina el contacto con los funcionarios, lo que reduce su función permisiva y los riesgos de corrupción, garantizando la transparencia y la rendición de cuentas. El propósito de este artículo es un análisis comparativo del desarrollo del gobierno electrónico en diferentes países de Europa y Asia, así como la consideración de la correlación entre la expansión de las funciones de gobierno electrónico y la reducción de los riesgos de corrupción en Kazajstán.
References
ANDERSEN, TB (2009). “E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy”, Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), pp. 201-210.
BERTOT, JC, JAEGER, PT & GRIMES, JM (2012). “Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government”, Transforming government: people, process and policy, 6(1), pp. 78-91.
BHATNAGAR, S & APIKUL, C (2006). “Fighting corruption with e-government applications”, APDIPe-Note, 8, pp. 1–4.
BONDARENKO, T, BORODIN, A, ZHOLAMANOVA, M, PANAEDOVA, G, BELYANCHIKOVA, T & GURIEVA, L (2020). “Investments to the petrochemical sector: the value of the competitiveness of petrochemical companies”, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), pp. 2510-2525.
DYUSENOV, MM & KABYLDIN, AM (2017). Digitalization as a mechanism to reduce corruption risks: An analysis of the experience of Estonia and Georgia. Retrieved from https://www.apa.kz/download/rcsaci/actual-research/.
ELBAHNASAWY, NG (2014). “E-government, internet adoption, and corruption: an empirical investigation”, World Development, 57, pp. 114-126.
GORBUNOVA, A (2019). “90% of public services in Kazakhstan in the next 2 years will be available online”. Retrieved from https://forbes.kz//process/internet/90_gosuslug_v_kazahstane_v_blijayshie_2_goda_stanut_dostupnyi_onlayn/.
INDEX OF /DOWNLOAD/RCSACI/ACTUAL-RESEARCH (2017) “Analysis of the state and trends in the prevalence of corruption at the international and national levels”. Retrieved from https://www.apa.kz/download/rcsaci/actual-research/.
KARV, J (2015). “E-Government and its ability to reduce corruption-The case of Estonia”.
KIZABEKOVA, A. & CHERNYSHENKO, V. (2020). “E-Government Avatar-Based Modeling and Development”, in: Avatar-Based Control, Estimation, Communications, and Development of Neuron Multi-Functional Technology Platforms. IGI Global. pp. 19-34.
KNOX, C & JANENOVA, S (2019). “The e-government paradox in post-Soviet countries”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(6), pp. 600-615.
KUKUSHEVA, N (2019). “Multiculturalism: A comparative analysis of western countries and Kazakhstan”, Opcion, 35, pp. 992 - 943.
LIO, MC, LIU, MC & OU, YP (2011). “Can the internet reduce corruption? A cross-country study based on dynamic panel data models”, Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), pp. 47-53.
MELENCHUK, A. (2018). “Can E-government Combat Corruption? Experience of Poland and Estonia”. Institute of Innovative Governance.
MENSAH, IK & MI, J (2019). “Predictors of the Readiness to Use E-Government Services From Citizens' Perspective”, International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), 10(1), pp. 39-59.
RYSTINA, I (2012). “Pedagogical Principles of Forming the Political Culture of Kazakhstan Youth”, World Applied Sciences Journal, 20, pp. 29-34.
TSINDELIANI, IA (2019). “Principles of the Public Financial Law as the Means of Legal Regulation of Public Finance”, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(5), pp. 1-12.
TYULYAGIN (2019). Retrieved from https://tyulyagin.ru/ratings/rejting-stran-mira-po-kolichestvu-internet-polzovatelej.html#3
UNITED NATIONS (2019). Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data-enter
WORLDWIDE GOVERNANCE INDICATORS (WGI) (2018). Retrieved from https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Reports