Effect of free will on the creation of new impacts on the long-term temporary marriage
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The principle of free will stipulates that the contract, in terms of ordering the legal consequences and determining the type and nature of the agreement between the parties, should not conflict with certain rules. Given that the overwhelming majority of jurists and lawyers have considered the principle of free will as the origin of Article 10 of the Civil Code, as well as the rule of law of the subsidiary, but there is no consensus among them on the meanings and definitions of the principle of free will, in this paper, the impact of free will on the creation of new impacts on the long-term temporary marriage contract is examined.
References
AGHAJANIAN, A, VAEZZADE, S, KOHAN, JA & THOMPSON, V (2018). “Recent Trends of Marriage in Iran”. The Open Family Studies Journal, 10(1).
AKBARI, B (2016). “The religious attitude within psychological hardiness attachment styles among students who appeal for divorce”. Journal of Holistic Nursing And Midwifery, 26(2), pp. 1-8.
AMID-ZANJANI, A.A (1995). “Political Jurisprudence (vol.3)”. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publication. p. 498.
ARININ, E., CHELOVENKO, T., DORZHIGUSHAEVA, O., GLAGOLEV, V., MARKOVA, N., MATUSHANSKAIA, I., ... & VORONTSOVA, E. (2019). “Religion, Science and ‘Religious Education’in Russia Six Regional Projects”, European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(4), pp. 137-156.
BADRAN, SZ & TURNBULL, B (2019). “Contemporary Temporary Marriage: A Blog-analysis of First-hand Experiences”. Journal of International Women's Studies, 20(2), pp. 241-256.
CARTWRIGHT, J (2016). “Contract law: An introduction to the English law of contract for the civil lawyer”. Bloomsbury Publishing.
CLARK, CJ, BAUMEISTER, RF, & DITTO, PH (2017). “Making punishment palatable: Belief in free will alleviates punitive distress”. Consciousness and Cognition, 51, pp. 193-211.
EKSTROM, L (2018). “Free-will”. Routledge.
GALIMULLINA, R., PUCHININA, O., & KAZAKOVA, J. (2019). “Functional and syntactic features of free indirect discourse in MI tsvetaeva’s prose works”, Xlinguae, 12(3), pp. 80-92.
HAERI, M (1994). “The Jurisprudential Foundations of the Principle of Contract Freedom; an Analysis of Article 10 of the Civil Code”. Kayhan Publication. p. 11.
HELLI, Y.I.H (2002). “Muktalif Al-Shia fi Ahkam Al-Sharia”. Qom: Boostan Ketab (Book Garden) Publication. Volume 9, p. 227.
IMAMI, H (1995). “Civil Rights”, IV. Tehran, Iran. p. 158.
JAFARI LANGROODI, MJ (2008). “The Impact of Free Will in the Civil Code”. Tehran: Ganj Danesh Publication. p. 120.
KATOZIAN, N (2012). “General Rules of Contracts (Volume II)”. Publication Corporation Ltd. p. 382.
MARGALIT, Y (2018). “Temporary marriage: a comparison of the Jewish and Islamic conceptions”. Journal of Law and Religion, 33(1), pp. 89-107.
MOFID, M (1990). “Summary of Ijaz”. Beirut: al-Mafid al-Taba'ah Publication. p. 19
MOHAQEQ, DM (2009). “General Theory of Conditions and Obligations in Islamic Law”. Center for the Publication of Islamic Sciences, Tehran,
MOUSAVI ARDEBILI, M (2001), “Al-Mutta Nikah al-Muqata”. Al-Azawa Publishing Center. p. 21.
RAFIEI MOGHADDAM, A (2011). “The Principle of Consensually of Legal Acts”. Imam Sadegh University Press. pp. 46-47.
RAHMANI, M (2005). “Ahl al-Bayt jurisprudence (Persian)”. Qom: The Institute of Islamic Jurisprudence Encyclopedia of Ahl al-Bayt al-Islam. Volume 8, p. 142.
RAH-PEYK, H (2014). “Advanced Civil Law”. Tehran: Khorsandi Publications. First Edition, pp. 78-80.
SARTORIO, C (2016). “Causation and free will”l. Oxford University Press.
THANI, S (1990). “Malek al-Faham”. Qom: Institute of Islamic Encyclopedia. p. 449.
