World Images Mythological Floral Motifs of the English, Russian and Tatar Language. / Motivos florales mitológicos de las imágenes del mundo en inglés, ruso y tártaro.
Resumen
ABSTRACT
This paper is concerned with plant motifs in mythology in three different linguistic cultures – english, russian and tatar. The interest in the symbolism of flora is due to its wide distribution in world culture, reflected in mythological representations and various literary genres. Plants and trees, which are recognized as cultural concepts, are among the objects studied by the authors. It is analyzed mythological texts, modern linguists’ special considerations relating to nature concepts, the use of plant motifs in three linguistic world images, and the objectification of these images in national cultural consciousnesses.
RESUMEN
Este artículo se ocupa de los motivos florales en la mitología en tres culturas lingüísticas diferentes: inglesa, rusa y tártara. El interés por el simbolismo de la flora se debe a su amplia distribución en la cultura mundial, reflejada en representaciones mitológicas y diversos géneros literarios. Plantas y árboles reconocidos como conceptos culturales se encuentran entre los objetos estudiados por los autores. Se analizan textos mitológicos, las consideraciones especiales de los lingüistas modernos relacionadas con los conceptos de la naturaleza, el uso de motivos florales en tres imágenes del mundo lingüístico y la objetivación de estas imágenes en las conciencias culturales nacionales.
Citas
ALEXANDER, L (2017). "Mythology."In The Routledge Companion to Imaginary Worlds,Routledge, pp.115-126.
ASHRAPOVA, A, LITVINENKO, E & SHAKIROVA, D (2019). "Languageidentity and itscontextpolicies [Identidad del lenguaje y sus politicas de contexto]", Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24(5), pp.44-50.
BUCKINGHAM, L. (2016). Language, Identity and Education on the Arabian Peninsula: Bilingual Policies in a Multilingual Context.Multilingual Matters.
FRIEDERICI, AD (2017). Language in our brain: The origins of a uniquely human capacity.MIT Press.
GACHEV, GD (1998). National Images of the World: Lecture Course,М.: The Academia Publishing Center.
GIZATOVA, GK, IVANOVA, OG, KARIMOV, AR, STEPANENKO, GN, TERESHCHENKO, NA & SHATUNOVA, TM (2017). "Myth in the structure of national consciousness." Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 9(7), pp.1368-1379.
GUPTA, SM (1987)."Floral motifs based on legends. A Manual of Ethnobotany.
HESTER, S & HOUSLEY, W (2017). Language, Interaction and National Identity: Studies in the social organisation of national identity in talk-in-interaction.Routledge.
IVANOV, VV&TOPOROV, VN (1974).Studies in Slavonic Antiquities.Lexical and Phraseological Problems of Reconstructing Texts.
JOSEPH, J (2004). Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious.Springer.
КAGAN, МS (2001). The System Approach and Humanities Knowledge, The Questions in Philosophy.
KUBRYAKOVA, ЕS (1991). Human Factor in Language: Language and Speech Production,М.:Nauka.
KULYK, V (2011). "Language identity, linguistic diversity and political cleavages: evidence from Ukraine." Nations and nationalism, 17(3), pp.627-648.
MALYUGA, E & MCCARTHY, M (2018). "English and Russian vague category markers in business discourse: Linguistic identity aspects." Journal of Pragmatics, 135(41), pp.39-52.
MASLOVA, VA (2008). Introduction into Cognitive Linguistics: Manual, М.: Flinta: Nauka.
MORRIS, CW (1965). "Aesthetics, Signs and Icons."Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 25(3), pp.356-364.
SCHMIDT, R (2010). Language policy & identity in The US.Temple University Press.
SHIROKOVA, NS (2017). The Myths of the Celts.
TOLKIEN, JRR (2002). The Lord of the Rings: Keepers; The Two Towers; The Return of the King,In Russian translation from English by L. L. Yakhnin. – М.:АRМАDА: The “Alfa Book” Publishing.
TSAPKO, MI, VALYAROVSKIY, FI, MAIBORODA, ET, KHUSAINOVA, EN & VARNAVSKAYA, OO (2018). "Language identity as a unifying identity: Linguistic, ethnopolitical and international legal aspects." Space and Culture, India, 6(2), pp.121-129.
