Classical Eurasianism Variations During the Second Half of the 20th and Early-21st Centuries
Resumen
ABSTRACT
This article explores classical eurasianism as a specific branch of russian philosophy abroad in the early twentieth century, the ideas of which remain relevant and are currently revived by its followers. The author highlighted the main features and ideas of classical eurasianism (the idea of Russia-eurasia as a unique developmental space, the doctrine of sobornost, and the philosophy of an organizational idea) and compared them with the theories of L. N. Gumilyov and A. G. Dugin. However, the teaching of L. N. Gumilyov and the Neo-eurasianism of A. G. Dugin do not possess the original philosophical component of classical eurasianism.
RESUMEN
Este artículo explora el eurasianismo clásico como una rama específica de la filosofía rusa en el extranjero a principios del siglo XX, cuyas ideas siguen siendo relevantes, y actualmente son revividas por sus seguidores. El autor destacó las principales características e ideas del eurasianismo clásico (la idea de Rusia-Eurasia como un espacio de desarrollo único, la doctrina de sobornost y la filosofía de una idea organizativa) y las comparó con las teorías de L. N. Gumilyov y A. G. Dugin. Sin embargo, la enseñanza de L. N. Gumilyov y el neo-eurasianismo de A. G. Dugin no poseen el componente filosófico original del eurasianismo clásico.
Citas
BASSIN, M (2016). The Gumilyov Mystique: Biopolitics, Eurasianism, and the Construction of Community in Modern Russia. Ithaca: Cornell univ. press.
DUGIN, AG (2002). “He returned two thousand years of our life history to us! In Fundamentals of Eurasianism”. Moscow, pp.534-540.
DUGIN, AG (2004). “Eurasia” Project. Moscow: Eksmo, Yauza.
DUGIN, AG (2014). Eurasian revenge of Russia. Moscow: Algorithm.
ERASOV, BC (1994). “Russia in the Eurasian space”. Social Sciences and Modernity, pp.57–67.
ERMOLAEV, VYU (2006). “Black legend: The name of the idea and the symbol of fate. In L. N. Gumilyov Black Legend: Friends and Foes of the Great Steppe”. Moscow, pp.7-26.
EURASIANISM (ATTEMPT OF SYSTEMATIC PRESENTATION) (1997). “In Continent Eurasia”. Moscow: Agraf, pp.13-78.
GUMILYOV, LN (1972). “Ethnology and historical geography: (Landscape and ethnos: 13)”. Retrieved from http://Gumilyovica.kulichki.net/articles/Article114.htm (Accessed February, 1, 2020).
GUMILYOV, LN (1991). “Notes of the last Eurasianis”t. Our Heritage, 3(3), pp.19-26.
GUMILYOV, LN (2009). “Rhythms of Eurasia. In Rhythms of Eurasia: Epochs and Civilizations”. St. Petersburg: Leningrad Publishing House, pp.216-231.
HERNÁNDEZ G. de VELAZCO, Judith J; & CHUMACEIRO H., Ana C (2018). “Acercamiento histórico a la participación ciudadana en Venezuela: Modelo de relación Estado-Sociedad (1958-2012)”. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (RCS). Vol. XXIV, No. 2 , pp. 56-67.
INTRODUCTION (1921). Exodus to the East. Premonitions and Accomplishments. The Formation of the Eurasianists. Sofia.
INTRODUCTION (1923). “In Eurasian Chronicle. Book 3”. Berlin: Eurasian book publishing, pp.5-8.
ISAEVA, OS (2019). “The idea of sobornost in the philosophy of classical Eurasianism”. Manuscript, 12(5), pp.95-98.
KHORUZHIY, SS (2017). “The misadventures of tradition, or Why it is necessary to protect tradition from traditionalists”. Problems of philosophy, 9(12), pp.104-120.
LARUELLE, M (2001). “When intellectual property is purloined, or On the opposition of L. N. Gumilyov and P”. N. Savitsky”. Bulletin of Eurasia, 4(15), pp.5-19.
LARUELLE, M (2004). “The two faces of contemporary Eurasianism”. An imperial version of Russian nationalism. Nationalities Papers, 32(1). Cambridge University Press.
LOGOVIKOV, PV (1931). “Scientific objectives of Eurasianism. In The 1930s”. The Formation of the Eurasianists, pp.53-63.
LUSHNIKOV, OV (2019). “The Eurasian idea at the present stage: Civilizational, geopolitical, and geoeconomic aspects”. The Echo of Centuries, pp.174-186.
MASLIN, MA (2012). “Eurasianism as a post-revolutionary ideological movement”. Historical and Philosophical Yearbook, pp.362-380.
MASLIN, MA (2015). “Classical Eurasianism and its modern transformations”. Notebooks on Conservatism, 4(14), pp.201-210.
MASLIN, MA (2019). “At the origins of Eurasianism. To mark the 100th anniversary of the publication of the book of Prince Nikolai Trubetskoy “Europe and Humanity”. Philosophy Journal, 12(4), pp.161‒178.
MASLIN, MA & LUPANOVA, AA (2014). “Evolution of the Eurasian idea. In Russian Abroad: History and Present: Collection of articles. (Ed.) Yu. V. Mukhachev. Moscow: RAS. INION”. Center for Integrated Research on Russian Emigration, pp.17-75.
MASLOVA, EK (2018). “Socio-natural approaches to history: the influence of subjective factors on the recognition of the scientific nature of the theory on the example of the concepts of L. N. Gumilyov and E. S. Kulpin”. History and Modernity, September, pp.94-115.
RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R; LAY, N; AVENDAÑO, I & HERRERA, B (2018). “Liderazgo resiliente como competencia potenciadora del talento humano”. Opción. Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 34(86), pp. 826-854.
SAVITSKY, PN (1997). “Geographical overview of Russia-Eurasia. In Continent Eurasia”. Moscow: Agraf, pp.279-294.
SAVITSKY, PN (1997). “Geographical overview of Russia-Eurasia”. In Continent Eurasia, Moscow: Agraf, pp.279-294.
SEMUSHKIN, AV (2002). “The ideological limits of Eurasian metaphysics. In Eurasian Idea and Modernity: Collection of Articles”. Moscow: Publishing House of RUDN University, pp.121-131.
SHLAPENTOKH, D (2012). “Lev Gumilyov: The ideologist of the Soviet empire”. History of European Ideas, 38(3), pp.483-492.
SKLADANOWSKI, M (2019). “The myth of Russian exceptionalism: Russia as a civilization and its Uniqueness in Aleksandr G. Dugin’s Thought”. Politics Religion & Ideology, 20(4), pp.423-446.
VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, JOSÉ VICENTE & GANGA, FRANCISCO (2016). “Bioética, dignidad e intertemporalidad de los Bioderechos Humanos”. In Revista de Filosofía. Vol. 83, Nº. 2: 7-24.
