Method and Style of Religious and Philosophical Criticism of Vasily Rozanov

  • ANDREY SERGEEVICH BALANDIN Kazan Federal University,Russia
  • VIACHESLAV NIKOLAEVICH KRYLOV Kazan Federal University,Russia
  • GENNADY YURYEVICH KARPENKO Samara National Research University. Russia.




The appearance of a significant and new figure in criticism cannot be accidental. Criticism as a specific form of activity presupposes an equally special mindset for which somewhat different tasks are important than, for example, for a philosopher, an artist or a scientist. The purpose of the present article is to show how the specific method of working with text and the unique literary style of Rozanov determined his way from philosophy to criticism. Methodological principles and stylistic features are discovered in V. Rozanov’s literary and critical heritage, which later become attribute features of Russian religious and philosophical thought.



La aparición de una figura nueva y significativa en la crítica no puede ser accidental. La crítica como una forma específica de actividad presupone una mentalidad igualmente especial para la cual las tareas algo diferentes son importantes como, por ejemplo, para un filósofo, un artista o un científico. El propósito del presente artículo es mostrar cómo el método específico de trabajar con el texto y el estilo literario único de Rozanov determinaron su camino de la filosofía a la crítica. Los principios metodológicos y las características estilísticas se descubren en la herencia literaria y crítica de V. Rozanov, que luego se convierten en características de atributos del pensamiento religioso y filosófico ruso.


BEKMETOV, R (2015). “Comparative studies of literature in Russia: Exploration of new paradigms”, Journal of Language and Literature, 6(2), pp.141-145.

BEKMETOV, R, RAMI, I, YUNUSOV, I & BOLDYREVA, O (2019). “West – East» op-position in Russian literature and philosophy of 1830-1850s: search for civilizational identity”, RevistaGenero&Direito, 8(2), pp.400–410.

DIANOV, D (2004). “F.М. Dostoevsky’s Creative Search in the Assessment of Russian Religious and Philosophical Criticism of the Late 19th - Early 20th Centuries (K. Leontiev, V. Soloviev, V. Rozanov)”, Author’s Thesis for Candidate of Philology, p.20.

DIMBLEBY, L (1996). “Rozanov and the Word”, University of London, p.598.

HIRSCH, E & CULTURAL LITERACY, JR (1988). “What Every American Needs Know”, N.Y, p.2125.

JACKSON, R (1993). “Dialocrues with Dostoevsky. The Overwhelming Questions”, p.457.

KONOVALOV, V (1995). “Philosophical Criticism” as a Term of Literary Criticism”, Kazan State University Transactions, pp.102-109.

LAMB, D (1987). “Hegel and Modern Philosophy”, Croom Helm, p.514.

LAWRENCE, D (1961). “Fallen Leaves, by VV. Rozanov”, Phoenix. The Posthumous Papers of D. H. Lawrence, pp.92-388.

MA, X & MARION, R (2019). “Exploring how instructional leadership affects teacher efficacy: A multilevel analysis”. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 20(10), pp.1-20. doi:10.1177/1741143219888742

MCCABE, A (2003). “Dostoevsky's French reception: from Vogüé, Gide, Shestov and Berdyaev to Marcel, Camus and Sartre (1880-1959)”, p.112.

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND CULTURE (2019). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 6 tahun 2019 tentang pedoman organisasi dan tata kerja satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah (Guidelines for organization and work procedures of primary and secondary education units). Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

OBLASOVA, T (2002). “Russian Literary Criticism of the Turn of the 19th-20th Centuries (Ways of Self-Knowledge: Religious and Philosophical direction)”, Author’s Thesis for Candidate of Philology, p.22.

PASHKUROV, A & RAZZHIVIN, A (2016). “Literary culture: its types and lessons”, European journal of science and theology, 12(2), pp.155-164.

PICCAROZZI, M, AQUILANI, B & GATTI, C (2018). “Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review”. Sustainability, 10(3821), pp.1-24. doi:10.3390/su10103821.

PORTER, DD (2019). “The effect of principal behaviors on student, teacher, and school outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature”. Review of Educational Research, 20(10), pp.1-43. doi:10.3102/0034654319866133

RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R., MARCANO, M., RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R., LAY RABY, N & HERRERA TAPIAS, B (2019). “Relationship Between social intelligence and resonant leadership in public health Institutions”. Opción. Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 35(90), pp.2477-9385.

READ, CH (1979). “Religion, Revolution and the Russian Intelligentsia 1900-1912: The Vekhi Debate and its Intellectual Background”, Macmillan, p.612.

ROSENTHAL, B (1991). “A New Word for a New Myth: Nietzsche and Russian Futurism', in The European Foundations of Russian Modernism”, Lewiston, pp.50-219.

ROZANOV, V (1886). “On Understanding”, p.737.

ROZANOV, V (1989). “Thoughts about Literature”, Sovremennik, p.607.

SHABARSHINA, V (2005). “Originality of Literary Critics by D. S. Merezhkovsky of the End of 19th – the Beginning of 20th Centuries”, Author’s Thesis for Candidate of Philology, p.185.

VAFINA, A & ZINNATULLINA, Z (2015). “Antithesis Union in Mithopoetics of Vyacheslav Ivanov”, Journal of Language and Literature, 6(3), pp.47-50.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J & RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R (2018). “El derecho a la autobiografía: dimensión ius-filosófica desde la perspectiva de H. Arendt y P. Ricoeur”. Opción. Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 34(18), pp. 1012-1587.

Cómo citar
BALANDIN, A. S., KRYLOV, V. N., & KARPENKO, G. Y. (2020). Method and Style of Religious and Philosophical Criticism of Vasily Rozanov. Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(1), 135-141. Recuperado a partir de