Mediation in the Multicultural Society of Kazakhstan: Tradition and Modernity
Resumen
ABSTRACT
Mediation is considered as a form of pre-trial conflict settlement as exemplified by both modern mediation councils and traditional mediation institutions in Kazakhstan. The paper considered the multiculturalism as a nation-building liberal theory that seeks the equality rights of ethnic minorities within one civic identity. Based on the analysis of the Multiculturalism Policy Index of Kazakhstan (MPI), a conclusion is drawn on the level of compliance with the rights of ethnic groups in Kazakhstan. The article investigated empirical data of the recent inter-ethnic conflicts in southeastern Kazakhstan that are used to analyze the problems and methods of resolving inter-ethnic conflicts.
RESUMEN
La mediación se considera como una forma de solución de conflictos previa al juicio, como lo demuestran los consejos de mediación modernos y las instituciones de mediación tradicionales en Kazajstán. El documento consideraba el multiculturalismo como una teoría liberal de construcción de la nación que busca los derechos de igualdad de las minorías étnicas dentro de una identidad cívica. Basado en el análisis del Índice de Políticas de Multiculturalismo de Kazajstán (IPM), se llega a una conclusión sobre el nivel de cumplimiento de los derechos de los grupos étnicos en Kazajstán. El artículo investigó datos empíricos de los recientes conflictos interétnicos en el sureste de Kazajstán que se utilizan para analizar los problemas y métodos para resolver conflictos interétnicos.
Citas
ALENKINA, N, & TURSUNBAEVA, N (2017). “Courts of Biys and Aksakals in Kyrgyzstan: What the History Teaches About?”. Russian Journal of Comparative Law, (4), pp. 3-8.
BANTING, K, & KYMLICKA, W (2013). “Is there a retreat from multiculturalism policies? New evidence from the multiculturalism policy index”. Comparative European Politics, 11(5), pp. 577-598.
BUSI, VP (2014). “Multiculturalism in Kazakhstan: Evolution of a Multi-ethnic Society and the Progress of an Effective Intercultural Communication (Bachelor's thesis, Università Ca'Foscari Venezia)”.
IGARASHI, A (2019). “Till multiculturalism do us part: Multicultural policies and the national identity of immigrants in European countries”. Social science research, 77, pp. 88-100.
KADYRALIYEVA, AM, ZHOLDUBAEVA, AK, MUKHANBETA, & ISENGALIEVA, AG (2015). “The origins of multiculturalism in Kazakhstan (in the example of South Kazakhstan region)” European Journal of Science and Theology, 11(4), pp. 213- 224.
KALASHNIKOVA, NP, & KALASHNIKOV, NN (2017). “NEW MEDIA TRENDS: FEATURES AND CHALLENGES”. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “World Science”, 8 (24), pp. 88-92.
KUKUSHEVA, NE (2019). “Multiculturalism: A comparative analysis of western countries and Kazakhstan” Opción, Año, 35(23), pp. 922-943.
KYMLICKA, W (2018). “Minority rights in Robyn Eckersley and Chris Brown (Eds.) Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory”. Oxford University Press, 166-178.
SULEIMEN, S (2018). “The Biys’ court proposed to revive in Kazakhstan”.
TUGZHANOV, EL (2013). “Institute of the Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan in the context of social modernization”. Law and State, 1(58), pp. 8-12.
UALIKHANOV, SHSH, & UALIKHANOV, CHCH (1985). “Note on judicial reform. The court of Biys in the ancient folk form”. Collected Works in five volumes: volume 4. Alma-Ata.
ZHUMASULTANOV, TZ (2005). “The people of Kazakhstan: the current state of the population in the Republic of Kazakhstan”. Almaty.