Redes de investigación transdisciplinar tecnocientífico en contextos reticulares / Networks of transdisciplinary technoscientific research in reticular contexts
Resumen
RESUMEN
El artículo tiene como propósito construir fundamentos teóricos para explicar las implicaciones que tienen las estructuras en red en la creación de conocimiento transdisciplinar-tecnocientifico. Se explica cómo las redes denominadas hubs y su dinámica inciden en el incremento de la eficiencia investigativa. Los resultados destacan como la conformación de hubs aumenta la capacidad para innovar en la producción de conocimiento. Se concluye que la disponibilidad de conocimiento transdisciplinar tecnocientífico está asociada al perfil de capacidades de los actores, quienes movilizan la transferencia de conocimiento de acuerdo a las dinámicas de los hubs de investigación.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the article is to build theoretical foundations to explain the implications that network structures have in the creation of transdisciplinary teno-scientific knowledge. It is explained how the networks called hubs and their dynamics affect the increase in research efficiency. The results showed that the shaping of hubs increases the capacity to innovate in the production of knowledge. It is concluded that the availability of transdisciplinary techno-scientific knowledge is associated with the capacity profile of the actors, who mobilize the transfer of knowledge according to The dynamics of the research hubs.
Citas
ABBOTT, A. (2001). “Chaos of disciplines”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
BRANDT, P.et al. (2013). A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics. Volume 92, Pages 1-15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800913001377
BRAVO, O.; MARÍN-GONZÁLEZ, F. & CARRERA, M. (2013). “Redes Interorganizacionales y Desarrollo Local”. OPCIÓN 29(70). http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=31028677006
BRESCHI, S, & CUSMANO, L. (2004). “Unveiling the texture of a European Research Area: Emergence of oligarchic networks under EU framework programmes”. International Journal of Technology Management, 27, 747–772.
BRUCE, A. C, TAIT, L. J., & WILLIAMS, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures, 36, 457–470.
CARLEY, K. M. (2003). “Dynamic network analysis”. En: Breiger RL, Carley KM, Pattison PE, editors. Dynamic social network modeling and analysis. Washington, D.
CATALÁ-LÓPEZ, F. et al. (2018). “Mapping of global scientific research in comorbidity and multimorbidity: A cross-sectional analysis”. PLoS ONE 13(1): 0189091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
CHOUDHURY, P. & TARUN K. (2014). "Charting Dynamic Trajectories: Multinational Firms in India." Special Issue on Business, Networks, and the State in India. Business History Review 88, no. 1: pp. 133-169
CILLIER, P. & NICOLESCU, B. (2012). “Complexity and transdisciplinarity: Discontinuity, levels of reality and the Hidden Third”. Futures, 44, 711-718.
CISTERNA, F. (2005). “Categorización y Triangulación como Procesos de Validación del Conocimiento en Investigaciones Cualitativas”. Theoria, 14(1), pp. 61-71.
CURRARINI, S.; MATHESON, J. & VEGA REDONDO, F. (2016). “A Simple Model of Homophily in Social Networks”. University of Leicester, Department of Economics. Working Paper 16/05. https://www.le.ac.uk/economics/research/RePEc/lec/leecon/dp16-05.pdf?uol_r=d307e306
ESPINOZA, R. L. (2015). Morfología de las Redes Interorganizacionales. Material de apoyo para desarrollo del Seminario de Investigación Doctoral: “Redes Interorganizacionales”. Doctorado en Ciencias Humanas. Universidad del Zulia – Facultad de Humanidades y Educación. Coordinación de Estudios para Graduados. Maracaibo, Estado Zulia, Venezuela. Mayo, 2015.
ESPINOZA R. L. (2017). “Redes Interorganizacionales”. Ediciones del Vicerrectorado Académico de la Universidad del Zulia. Maracaibo, Venezuela.
ESPINOZA, R. L. (2018): Producción de Conocimiento Interdisciplinario y Transdisciplinario en Contextos Reticulares. Material de apoyo para desarrollo del Seminario de Investigación Doctoral: “Investigación y Producción de Conocimiento Interdisciplinario y Transdisciplinario en Contextos Reticulares”. Doctorado en Ciencias Humanas. Universidad del Zulia – Facultad de Humanidades y Educación. Coordinación de Estudios para Graduados. Maracaibo, Estado Zulia, Venezuela.
EUROPEAN SCIENCE FOUNDATION (2017). ESF Research Networking Programs. archives.esf.org/coordinating-research/research-networking-programmes.html
FELD, S. & CARTER, W. C. (2002). “Detecting measurement bias in respondent reports of personal networks”. Social Networks 24, pp. 365-383.
GIBBONS, M. et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
GOLUB, B. & JACKSON, M. O. (2012). “How Homophily Affects the Speed of Learning and Best-Response Dynamics”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(3), pp. 1287–1338. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs021
HERSCHBACH, D. R. (2000).”Technology as Knowledge: Implications for Instruction”. Journal of Technology Education 7(1).
HUGH, L. (2012). "Reflections On Science And Technoscience". Scientiae Studia 10, pp. 103-128. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-31662012000500007 https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-philosophy/132
THE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH NETWORK CONNECTIONS (IRNC) (2016). Funding & Research Community. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2009/nsf09564/nsf09564.htm
JACOBS, J. A. & FRICKEL, S. (2009). “Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment”. Annual Review of Sociology 35, pp. 43-65.
KATZ, J. S. (2006). “Indicators for Complex Innovation Systems”. Research Policy 35 (7), pp. 893-909 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222646149_Indicators_for_Complex_Innovation_Systems
KOKA, B. R. & PRESCOTT, J. E. (2002). “Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view”. Strategic Management Journal 23(9).
MAGGIONI, M. A. & UBERTI, T. E. (2007). “Inter-regional knowledge flows in Europe: An econometric analysis”. In K. Frenken (Ed.), Applied evolutionary economics and economic geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
MAGGIONI, M. A., NOSVELLI, M., & Uberti, T. E. (2014). “Does intentional mean hierarchical? Knowledge flows and innovative performance of European regions”. Annals of Regional Science, 53, 453–485.
MALI, F.; KRONEGGER, L.; DOREIAN, P. & FERLIGOJ, A. (2012). “Dynamic scientific co-authorship networks”. In A. Scharnhorst, K. Borner, & P. van den Besselaar (Eds.), Models of science dynamics. Encounters between complexity theory and information sciences. Berlin: Springer.
MCGREGOR, S. (2015). Transdisciplinary knowledge creation. Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS.
MCPHERSON, M.; SMITH-LOVIN, L. & COOK, J. M. (2001). “Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks”. Annual review of sociology, pp. 415-444.
MARÍN-GONZÁLEZ, F.; CABAS, L.; CABAS, L. & PAREDES-CHACÍN, A. (2018). “Formación Integral en Profesionales de la Ingeniería. Análisis en el Plano de la Calidad Educativa”. Formación universitaria 11(1), pp. 13-24. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000100013
MORILLO, F.; BORDONS, M. & Gomez, I. (2003),”Interdisciplinarity in Science: A Tentative Typology of Disciplines and Research Areas”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54, pp.1237–49.
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION –NSF (2016): The International Research Network Connections (IRNC) program. ttps://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19318/?org=NSF
NORDMANN, A. (2012). “Object lessons: towards an epistemology of technoscience”. Scientiæ Studia 10, special issue, pp. 11-31. http://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48844
PROTOGEROU, A.; CALOGHIROU, Y. & SIOKAS, E. (2010). “Policy-driven collaborative research networks in Europe”. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 19, pp. 349–372.
PROVAN, K. & KENIS, P. (2008). “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. jpart.oxfordjournals.org at University of Alaska Anchorage on August 20, 2011
SCHERNGELL, T. & BARBER, M. J. (2011). “Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: Evidence from the fifth EU framework programme”. Annals of Regional Science 46, pp. 247–266.
SCHERNGELL, T. & LATA, R. (2013). “Towards an integrated European research area? Findings from eigenvector filtered spatial interaction models using European framework programme data”. Papers in Regional Science 92(3), pp. 555–577.
SCHOLZ, R.W. (2011). Environmental literacy in science and society. From knowledge to decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
THOMAS, C. J. et al. (2012). “Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges”. Sustain Sci 7(supl. 1), pp. 25-43. https://www.albany.edu/gogreen/files/documents/faculty%20forum/Lang.pdf
TURNER, S. (2000). “What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different?”. In N. Stehr & P. Weingart (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE. (2017). Strategic Research Initiative & Networks. Interdisciplinary Research Centres. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/research-at-cambridge/interdisciplinary-research-centres
UNIVERSITY OF YORK. (2017). Interdisciplinary Research Network for Economists and Philosophers. Department of Economics and Related Studies. https://irnep.wordpress.com/
WHITLEY, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon.
EUROPEAN SCIENCE FOUNDATION (2017). “ESF Research Networking Programs”. archives.esf.org/coordinating-research/research-networking-programmes.html
TSEKERIS, C. & KATERELOS, I. (2008). “Reconsidering the Understanding of Technoscientific Knowledge”. Journal of Social Sciences 4 (2), pp. 75-79.
