Double Random Technique to Evaluate the Uncertainty of Safety Factor in Soils of Limit Equilibrium Methods

Keywords: Slope stability, Feedforward artificial neural network, Random numbers, Factor of safety analysis

Abstract

This article proposes a double random technique that allows the use of a random safety factor, evaluating the effects of uncertainty in geotechnical parameters in the stability analysis of slopes in soils, not considered in limit equilibrium methods. The proposed technique uses criteria from Artificial Neural Networks with Feedforward topology. Data from thirteen study sites are used for the average safety factor (ASF) analysis; a significance factor or confidence level is applied to this safety factor to ultimately obtain the minimum safety factor (MSF). The results indicate that the proposed technique provides consistent MSF results when compared with the safety factors published in the cited references.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Manuel Felipe Brito Quijada , Central University of Venezuela

Professor. Faculty of Engineering, Postgraduate Program in Road Maintenance. Central University of Venezuela.

References

Badry Pallavi, “Slope Stability”. Slope stability-170412060011.pdf. Pag. 49-56.

Caro Soler John Freddy, IBAGUÉ (2012). “Análisis de estabilidad de taludes por métodos de dovelas”. Método simplificado de Fellenius, Bishop y Janbú. Seminario I. Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ingeniería Civil. Pag. 14.

Cernica John N (1982). “Geotechnical Engineering” Holt-Saunders International Editions. Japan. Example 11-3. Pag. 290-291

Duncan J. Michael. “Soil Slope Stability Analysis. Chapter 13. Sr.247-013.pdf. Page. 358

Duncan J. M., Buchnani A.L., De Wet Manus March (1987). “An Engineering Manual for Slope. Stability Studies”. Report of a study performed by the Virginia Tech Center for Geotechnical Practice and Research. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Pag. 55 a 57.

Duncan J. Michael, Wright Stephen G., Brandom Thomas L. (2014). “Soil Strength and Slope Stability”. John Wiley & Sons, INC. New Jersey. Example 4. Pag. 142, 143, 144.

Duncan J. Michael, Wright Stephen G., Brandom Thomas L. (2014). “Soil Strength and Slope Stability”. John Wiley & Sons, INC. New Jersey. Example 6. Pag. 147, 148, 149, 150.

Duncan J. Michael, Wright Stephen G., Brandom Thomas L. (2014). “Soil Strength and Slope Stability”. John Wiley & Sons, INC. New Jersey. Example 7. Pag. 151, 152, 153, 154.

Duncan J. Michael, Wright Stephen G., Brandom Thomas L ( 2014). “Soil Strength and Slope Stability”. John Wiley & Sons, INC. New Jersey. Example 8. Pag. 155, 156, 157, 158.

GEOSLOPE INTERNATIONAL, Ltd, 2018. “Stability Modeling with Geostudio”. 1200,700-6th Ave SW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2O OT8. Pag. 31-33.

Méndez, Eugenia (2016), análisis de estabilidad de taludes y factor de seguridad, CAPITULO V -1_644_282_497_5026. Pag.69-74

ResearchGate. Soil and Foundation, lesson 6, chapter 6-slope stability. Page 107-110.

Riddolls & Grocott Ltd (1999). Quantitative Risk Assessment Methods for Determining Slope Stability Risk in the Building Industry. Building Research Association of New Zealand, Study Report SR 83, Judgeford. Pag. 83-88.
Published
2026-05-14
How to Cite
Brito Quijada , M. F. (2026). Double Random Technique to Evaluate the Uncertainty of Safety Factor in Soils of Limit Equilibrium Methods. Journal of the University of Zulia , 17(49), 206-226. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20174230