Building Pedagogical Partnership Competence Among Primary School Teachers

• Liudmyla Melenets Borys Hrinchenko Kyiv University, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0246-2674
• Svitlana Savchenko Institute Advanced Training, Borys Hrinchenko Kyiv University, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7123-9014
• Larysa Kravchuk Borys Hrinchenko Kyiv University, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-2912
• Olena Poliakova Borys Hrinchenko Kyiv University, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1152-2045
• Yurii Сherpak Borys Hrinchenko University of Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-1237
• Viktoriia Shcherbyna LLC “Montessori New Age School”, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0103-2197

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.41.02

Keywords: Advanced training, pedagogical education, association competence, educational process, pedagogical technologies

Abstract

Purpose. The objective of the study was to determine the pedagogical association competence and the methods for its development among primary school teachers. methods. In the investigation, the methods of survey by questionnaire, observation and evaluation of experts were applied. The methods of mathematical statistics were also used to process the results of the data obtained. Results. The general analysis of the research results shows that the majority of primary school teachers have a work experience of 5 to 10 years (35%) and 10 to 15 years (20%). Regarding the pedagogical collaboration with parents, 60% of teachers are involved in it, while 40% are not. However, 70% of teachers involve parents in solving issues related to the education and upbringing of students. conclusions. The study showed that the proposed curriculum was effective in building the pedagogical association competence. Most of the teachers had more than 5 years of work experience, so they had already gained enough experience in upskilling and developing pedagogical partnership strategies. However, according to the results of the work, the proposed training program is highly effective. Perspectives. Future research should focus on studying the effectiveness of the main methods of pedagogical interaction.

References

Androutsos, A., & Brinia, V. (2019). Developing and piloting a pedagogy for teaching innovation, collaboration, and co-creation in secondary education based on design thinking, digital transformation, and entrepreneurship. Education Sciences, 9(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020113

Baeten, M., Simons, M., Schelfhout, W., & Pinxten, R. (2018). Team teaching during field experiences in teacher education: Exploring the assistant teaching model. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1448780

Bedir, H. (2019). Pre-service ELT teachers’ beliefs and perceptions on 21st century learning and innovation skills (4Cs). Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.547718

Boliak, T. M. (2021). Professional competence of a primary school teacher as a condition for successful learning in a New Ukrainian School. Scientific journal of M. P. Dragomanov National Pedagogical University. Series 5 Pedagogical Sciences: Realities and Perspectives, 79(1), 57-61. Retrieved from http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/34485

Brinkley-Etzkorn, K. E. (2018). Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.004

Brinkmann, S. (2020). The invisible barriers to India’s educational reforms. Economic & Political Weekly, 55(4), 50–57. Retrieved from https://www.epw.in/journal/2020/4/special-articles/invisible-barriers-indias-educational-reforms.html

Cebrián, G., Junyent, M., & Mulà, I. (2020). Competencies in education for sustainable development: Emerging teaching and research developments. Sustainability, 12(2), 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020579

Custodio-Espinar, M., López-Hernández, A., & Buckingham, L. R. (2022). Effects of co- teaching on clil teacher trainees’ collaborative competence. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación Del Profesorado, 26(1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v26i1.16853

Demenska, Ya. I. (2022). Pedagogy of partnership between the teacher and parents of younger students in the conditions of the digital society. Master Studious, 22, 181-184. Retrieved from http://ekhsuir.kspu.edu/123456789/17081

Eddles-Hirsch, K., Kennedy-Clark, S., & Francis, T. (2020). Developing creativity through authentic programming in the inclusive classroom. Education, 48(8), 909–918. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=source%3A"Education+3-13"&pg=10&id=EJ1271479

Fedorchuk, N. (2022). reparation of future primary school teachers for the implementation of the New Ukrainian School Concept. New Learning Technologies, 96, 168-173. https://doi.org/10.52256/2710-3560.2022.96.24

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Gupta, R. (2021). The role of pedagogy in developing life skills. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 15(1), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801020974786

Honcharuk, O. (2022). Specific formation of pedagogical partnership competence in future primary class teachers. Scientific journal of M. P. Dragomanov National Pedagogical University. Series
5 Pedagogical Sciences: Realities and Perspectives, 88, 65-70. Retrieved from http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/38298

Hu, Y., & Spiro, R. J. (2021). Design for now, but with the future in mind: a “cognitive flexibility theory” perspective on online learning through the lens of MOOCs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 373–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/computers11030032

Ivanets, N. V. (2019). Pedagogy of partnership as a means of forming multicultural competence in primary school students. Image of the Modern Pedagogue, 4(187), 88-93. https://doi.org/10.33272/2522-9729-2019-4(187)-88-93

Molerov, D., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Nagel, M. T., Brückner, S., Schmidt, S., & Shavelson, R. J. (2020). Assessing university students’ critical online reasoning ability: A conceptual and assessment framework with preliminary evidence. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.577843

Ostrovska, M. Ya. (2021). Features of training of future teachers in the context of primary school Reform. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: “Pedagogy. Social Work”, 1(48), 315-319. Retrieved from https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/37589

Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2018). Innovations and challenges in CLIL teacher training. Theory into Practice, 57(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1492238

Reichert, F., Zhang, D. J., Law, N. W., Wong, G. K., & de la Torre, J. (2020). Exploring the structure of digital literacy competence assessed using authentic software applications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 2991–3013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09825-x

Roussinos, D., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). Examining primary education teachers’ perceptions of TPACK and the related educational context factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1666323

Sukhopara, I. (2020). Emotional competence of the teacher in the context of the New Ukraine School. Scientific papers of Berdyansk State Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogical sciences, 1, 111-122. Retrieved from https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/31757

Sullivan, K., Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2020). Developing twenty-first century skills in out-of- school education: the Bridge21 Transition Year programme. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1835709

Sumardi, L., Rohman, A., & Wahyudiati, D. (2020). Does the teaching and learning process in primary schools correspond to the characteristics of the 21st century learning? International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 357-370. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1259424

Sytnik, A. V. (2021). The essence, structure and features of the teacher's partnership with parents of schoolchildren. Nova ukrainska shkola: traiektoriia postupu: zb. tez dopovidei, 42-44. Retrieved from https://mdu.in.ua/Nauch/Konf/2021/zbirnik_nush_2021.pdf#page=43

Turakulova, F. A., & Isakova A. M. (2022). Technology of methodical preparation of future primary school teachers for qualification practice. Eurasian Journal of Learning and Academic Teaching, 4, 185-188. Retrieved from https://www.geniusjournals.org/index.php/ejlat/article/view/482

Valtonen, T., Hoang, N., Sointu, E., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., ... Kukkonen, J. (2021). How pre-service teachers perceive their 21st-century skills and dispositions: A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106643

Vyshkivska, V., & Shyhyrynska, O. (2019). Organization of the education process in the new Ukrainian school: theoretical-practical aspect. Youth & Market, 11(178). https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4634.2019.191711

Yepikhina, M. (2022). Basic trends of professional training of future primary school teachers in the context of modern challenges. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: “Pedagogy. Social Work”, 2(51), 46-49. https://doi.org/10.24144/2524-0609.2022.51.46-49

Zgraggen, M. (2021). Blended learning model in a vocational educational training hospitality setting: from teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Training Research, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1933568