Parliamentary Control of Public Finances: European Experience and Ukrainian Realities under Conditions of War and COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
The war and the COVID-19 pandemic posed a great challenge to Ukraine from the point of view of public finances. The purpose of the study is to systematize the European experience and analyze the Ukrainian practice of implementing parliamentary control of public finances in the conditions of war and the COVID-19 pandemic. The methodological basis of the study is a systematic approach to the study of the process of parliamentary control of public finances in the conditions of war and the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve the goal, the research used scientific methods such as: the dialectical method, the method of comparative analysis, the methods of synthesis and systematization, abstraction, generalization, and the graphic method. The mechanism of parliamentary control in the field of public finances in Ukraine is analyzed, which allows the legislative branch of power to guarantee that public funds are used responsibly and efficiently. The functions of the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine, which is an independent body that monitors and controls public finances in Ukraine, are analyzed. The problems with ensuring parliamentary control of public finances are outlined, and measures to improve the efficiency of these processes are presented. The experience of the member states of the European Union in the implementation of parliamentary control of public finances has been analyzed, which will contribute to the analysis of the possibilities of implementing successful experience in Ukrainian practice.
Downloads
References
Congreso de los Diputados. https://www.congreso.es/.
Coroado, S., & de Sousa, L. (2021). What do we talk about when we talk about self- regulation in politics? Communication ECPR Joint sessions.
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Lynne G. Zucker (Ed.). Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environments (pp. 3–21). Ballinger.
Eduskunta. https://www.eduskunta.fi/fi/Sivut/default.aspx.
Federaal Parlement van België. https://www.dekamer.be/kvvcr/index.cfm.
François, A., & Phélippeau, E. (2018). Paraître transparent? Les usages des déclarations d’intérêts des maires des grandes villes françaises. Revue française d’administration publique, 165(1), 79–94.
Gwaibi, N. (2022). Cameroon: parliamentary (un)scrutiny amid multiple crises. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 10:2, 147-164, https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2093495.
Halladay, L. (2021). Queering Multiculturalism: Liberal Theory, Ethnic Pluralism, and the Problem of Minorities-within-Minorities Aret Karademir, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018, pp. 274. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne De Science Politique, 54(3), 733-735. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423921000627.
Hrvatski sabor. https://www.sabor.hr/.
Jongen, H. (2018). The authority of peer reviews among states in the global governance of corruption. Review of International Political Economy, 25(6), 909–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1512891.
Madival, E., & Laurent, J. (Eds.) (1862). Archives parlementaires de 1789 à 1860: recueil complet des débats législatifs et politiques des Chambres françaises. Librairie administrative Dupont.
Millward, R. & Ward, R. (1993). From Private to Public Ownership of Gas Undertakings in England and Wales, 1851–1947: Chronology, Incidence and Causes. Business History, 35:3, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076799300000084.
Nikiforov, P., Zhavoronok, A., Marych, M., Bak, N., Marusiak, N. (2022). State policy regulation conceptual principles of public-private partnership development. Cuestiones Políticas, 40(73), 417-434. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.22
Nikolov, N. (2013). Conflict of interest in European Public Law. Journal of Financial Crime, 20(4), 406–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2013-0042.
Országgyűlés. https://www.parlament.hu/web/guest/orszaggyules.
Parlamento Italiano. https://www.parlamento.it/home.
Parlement français. https://www.parlement.fr/.
Persson, T., Tabellini, G. (1999). The size and scope of government: Comparative politics with rational politicians. European Economic Review, 43(4–6), 699-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00131-7.
Riigikogu. http://www.riigikogu.ee/.
Sejm. https://www.sejm.gov.pl/Sejm9.nsf/home.xsp.
Sishuwa, S. (2020). Patronage politics and parliamentary elections in Zambia’s one-party state c. 1983–88. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 14:4, 591-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2020.1831146.
Staten-Generaal. https://www.staten-generaal.nl/.
Sveriges riksdag. https://www.riksdagen.se/.
UK Parliament. https://www.parliament.uk.
Verhovna Rada of Ukraine. https://www.rada.gov.ua.
Wickberg, S. & Phélippeau. É. (2022). From Prohibition to Regulation: Towards the Institutionalization of Parliamentary Ethics in France, Public Integrity. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2079296.
Zhavoronok, A., Chub, A., Yakushko, I., Kotelevets, D., Lozychenko, O., Kupchyshynа, O. (2022). Regulatory Policy: Bibliometric Analysis Using the VOSviewer Program. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(1). 39-48. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSN S.2022.22.1.7.
Copyright
The Revista de la Universidad del Zulia declares that it recognizes the rights of the authors of the original works published in it; these works are the intellectual property of their authors. The authors preserve their copyright and share without commercial purposes, according to the license adopted by the journal..
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)