Microlearning and microteaching: prospects of improvement in regions within crosscultural education

Selimov Timur  Sergeyevich; Bogoslovsky Vladimir  Ivanovich; Kiseleva Mariya  Andreevna; Zhukova Tatyana  Anatolyevna; Motchenko Anna  Nikolaevna

doi:10.46925//rdluz.35.21

Selimov Timur Sergeyevich Institute of International Education Moscow State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3304-642X
Bogoslovsky Vladimir Ivanovich Herzen State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7071-244X
Kiseleva Mariya Andreevna Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Moscow https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5911-406X
Zhukova Tatyana Anatolyevna Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Moscow https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2184-4814
Motchenko Anna Nikolaevna Moscow State University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-2958

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.35.21

Keywords: Microteaching, regionalism, crosscultural education

Abstract

The research article explores the evolving trends in modern education, which are microlearning and microteaching. The authors analyze microlearning and microteaching as the most progressive and up-to-date approach. This article brings up the role of the globalization in the process of education encompassing crosscultural education. Although micro learning and teaching embrace many demands of modern learning and teaching, the approaches catering to the needs of students from different regions, have not been developed yet. Therefore, the main objective is to demonstrate the opportunities which microlearning offers within crosscultural education. The authors consider theoretical and empirical revie w of the literature and a conceptual framework to be the basic methods. The results obtained can be formulated as follows: a regional model of the micro-learning education (learning and teaching) with a set of specific character traits of students to facilitate the ideas of microeducation has been developed. This article is aimed to discuss the evolvement, current perceptions, basic principles and tools of microteaching and microlearning; to analyze their efficiency in the modern world and to suggest its further development through analysis of cross-culturalism in education using Hoffstede's dimensions including the model for regional program developing within crosscultural education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Selimov Timur Sergeyevich, Institute of International Education Moscow State Pedagogical University

2nd year Bachelor degree student, «Foreign Languages and IT» program, Institute of International Education Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia.

Bogoslovsky Vladimir Ivanovich, Herzen State Pedagogical University

Professor, Department of digital education, Herzen State Pedagogical University, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Kiseleva Mariya Andreevna, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Moscow

English Language Teacher, Department of foreign languages and intercultural communication Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Moscow, Russia.

Zhukova Tatyana Anatolyevna, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Moscow

PhD in Education, Associate Professor Department of foreign languages and intercultural
communication Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Moscow, Russia .

Motchenko Anna Nikolaevna, Moscow State University

Senior English Language Teacher, Higher school of contemporary social sciences, Department of social science and management of social processes, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

References

Bruck, P. (2005). Microlearning as strategic research field: An invitation to collaborate. In Microlearning:Emerging Concepts, Practices and Technologies after eLearning. Proceeding of Microlearning. Innsbruck university press, P.13–17.

Clarke, Mike (2019). History and Politics of Microlearning, 231 p.

De Gagne, Jennie Chang; Hyeyoung; Park, Kate; Hall, Katherine; Woodward, Amanda; Yamane, Sandra & Kim Sang Suk (2019). Microlearning in Health Professions Education, Scoping Review, JMIR Med Educ., no 5(2): 13997. DOI: 10.2196/13997

Dennehy, Edward (2015). Hofstede and learning in higher-level education: An empirical study, International Journal of Management in Education 9(3), 323 p. DOI:10.1504/IJMIE.2015.070125

Edge, D., Fitchett, S., Whitney, M., & Landay, J. (2012). MemReflex: adaptive flashcards for mobile microlearning, MobileHCI’12, September 21–24, San Francisco, CA, USA, 218 p.

Giurgiu, Luminiţa (2017). Microlearning an Evolving ELearning Trend, Scientific Bulletin, 22(1), 19 p. DOI:10.1515/bsaft-2017-0003

Gona, Sirwan Mohammed, Karzan, Wakil, Sarkhell & Sirwan M. Nawroly (2018). The Effectiveness of Microlearning to Improve Students’ Learning Ability, International Journal of Educational Research Review. 3(3), P. 32-38. DOI:10.24331/ijere.415824

Hug, T., & Friesen, N. (2007). Outline of a microlearning agenda. Didactics of Microlearning. Concepts, Discourses and Examples, p.1.

Hug, Theo, Lindner, Martin & Bruck, Peter A. (2005). Microlearning: Emerging Concepts, Practices and Technologies after e-Learning., Innsbruck University Press, 13p.

Hug, T. (2010). Mobile learning as microlearning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 154 p. DOI: 10.4018/jmbl.2010100104

Jomah, O., Masoud, A.K., Kishore, X.P. & Aurelia, S. (2017). Micro Learning: A Modernized Education System, Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, Vol. 7 (1), 104 p.

Lynch, Mark (2019). Microlearning or Macrolearning, what are the benefits? 156 p.

Shail, Mrigank, S. (2019). Using Micro-learning on Mobile Applications to Increase Knowledge Retention and Work Performance: A Review of Literature. – Cureus, 11(8), 28 p. DOI:10.7759/cureus.5307

Sigh, Ravi Pratap (2014). Awesome resources on Micro-learning, 76 p. Sood, Isha (2018). Microlearning Research: What, How, When, 65 p.

Soula, Mitakidou, Evangelia, Tressou & Eugenia Daniilidou (2007). Cross-Cultural Education: A Challenge or a Problem? International Critical Childhood Policy Studies, 2(1), 70p.