Academic student fraud in longitudinal research design

  • Galina Epanchintseva Orenburg State University
  • Lydmila Zubova Orenburg State University
  • Tatyna Kozlovskaya Orenburg State University
  • Nonna Volosova Orenburg State University
  • Aleksei Lebedenko Orenburg Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
  • Nikolai Bukaev Orenburg branch of Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Keywords: longitudinal study, subjective representations, cognitive characteristics, emotional manifestations, behavioral patterns

Abstract

The authors emphasize the importance of studying academic fraud among students. This phenomenon takes on large-scale dimensions. The authors are convinced that the solution of the problem depends on the scientific knowledge of the psychological portrait of students. Within the framework of the personalist approach, the authors present a review of the scientific literature. The authors identified a problematic field of empirical research that would reveal the dynamics of students' subjective perceptions of a person who resorts to academic fraud. A sample of the study was formed, the author's questionnaire was presented. The results of a longitudinal study of the dynamics of subjective perceptions of cognitive characteristics, emotional manifestations, and behavioral patterns of a student's personality are presented for discussion. To complete the psychological portrait of the students, valid psychodiagnostic techniques were used in the study. The stages of the study are presented. The analysis of empirical data is based on the evidence-based methods of the statistical thesaurus. The findings of the study revealed the students’ ideas about the person resorting to plagiarism. In conclusion, the authors formulated step-by-step programs of psychological support for students to refuse to use various schemes of academic fraud.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Galina Epanchintseva, Orenburg State University

Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation, Orenburg.

Lydmila Zubova, Orenburg State University

Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation, Orenburg.

Tatyna Kozlovskaya, Orenburg State University

Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation.

Nonna Volosova, Orenburg State University

Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russian Federation, Orenburg.

Aleksei Lebedenko, Orenburg Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Orenburg Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public
Administration under the, Orenburg, Russian Federation.

Nikolai Bukaev, Orenburg branch of Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Orenburg branch of Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Russia.

References

Aushra A. (2006). Scientific electronic library as means of fight against Plagiarism // Educational Technology & Society. No. 9(3). Page 270 - 276. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9205011

Adebayo S. O. (2010). Correlation between Academic Cheating Behavior and Achievement Motivation. Nature and Science, vol. 8, no 12, pp. 130-134. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235752831_Correlation_between_Academic_Che ating_Behavior_and_achievement_motivation

Ajzen I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 32, pp. 665-683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x

Anderman E. M., Griesinger T., Westerfield G. (1998) Motivation and Cheating during Early Adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 90, pp. 84-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.84

Becker D.A., Ulstad I. (2007). Gender Differences in Student Ethics: Are Females Really more Ethical? Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, no 2, pp. 77-91. Available at: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/p/pod/dod -idx/gender-differences- in-student-ethics-are-females-really-more.pdf?c=plag;idno=5240451.0002.009;format=pdf

Brandao M., Teixeira A. C. (2005). Crime without Punishment: An Update Review of the Determinants of Cheating Among University Students. Research, Work in Progress, no 191, pp. 1-31. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24111576_Crime_without_punishment_An_update_review_of_the_determinants_of_cheating_among_university_students

Bugrimenko A. G. (2006). Internal and External Motivation of Pedagogical University Students. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie, no 4, pp. 51-60 (in Russian). Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/files/1486/psyedu_2006_n4_Bugrimenko.pdf

Bunn D. N., Caudill S. B., Gropper D. M. (1992). Crime in the Classroom: An Economic Analysis of Undergraduate Student Cheating Behavior. Journal of Economic Education, vol. 23, no 3, pp. 197-207. DOI: 10.1080 / 00220485.1992.10844753

Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral science, 3(1), 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830030103

Chirikov I., Shmeleva E., Loyalka P. (2019). The Role of Faculty in Reducing Academic Dishonesty among Engineering Students. Studies in Higher Education, 2019, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1616169

Dremova O. V., Maloshonok N. G., Terentev E. A. (2020) Seeking Justice in Academia: Criticism and Justification of Student Academic Dishonesty Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, nr 4 (158), рр. 366–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1987287

Eremeva N. V. Freedom, necessity and duty in the phenomenal and noumenal worlds in the teachings of M. Luther and the ethics of I. Kant [Electronic resource] N. V. Eremeva. Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences series. 201. No. 5. pp. 123-131. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2018.5.122. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2018.5.122

Ekman Paul (2010). Telling Lies. Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, And Marriage'272P, Saint Petersburg.

Freiburger T. L., Romain D. M., Randol B. M., Marcum C. D. (2017). Cheating Behaviors among Undergraduate College Students: Results from a Factorial Survey. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, vol. 28, no 2, pp. 222-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2016.1203010

Giluk T. L., Postlethwaite B. E. (2015). Big Five Personality and Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analytic Review. Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 72, pp. 59-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.027

Graham M. A., Monday J., O'Brien K, Steffen S. (1994). Cheating at Small Colleges: An Examination of Student and Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, vol. 35, pp. 255-260.

Grijalva T. C., Nowell C., Kerkvliet J. (2006). Academic Honesty and Online Courses. College Student Journal, vol. 40, no 1, pp. 180-185. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/101008/.

Grimes P. W. (2004). Dishonesty in Academics and Business: A Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Student Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 49, no 3, pp. 273-290. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/3146523/Dishonesty_in_Academics_and_Business_A_Cross_Cult ural_Evaluation_of_Student_Attitudes

Hard S. F., Conway J. M., Moran A. C. (2006). Faculty and College Student Beliefs about the Frequency of Student Academic Misconduct. Journal of Higher Education, vol. 77, no 6, pp. 1058–1080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778956

Harding T. S., Carpenter D. D., Finelli C. J. (2012). An Exploratory Investigation of the Ethical Behavior of Engineering Undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no 2, pp. 346-374. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1041.2&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Hensley L. C., Kirkpatrick K. M., Burgoon J. M. (2013). Relation of Gender, Course Enrollment, and Grades to Distinct Forms of Academic Dishonesty. Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 18, no 8, pp. 895-907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827641

Jones D. L. R. (2011). Academic Dishonesty: Are More Students Cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 141-150. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/110092/.


Kuntz J. R., Butler C. (2014). Exploring Individual and Contextual Antecedents of Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Cheating and Plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, vol. 24, no 6, pp. 478-494. DOI: 10.1080 / 10508422.2014.908380

McCabe D. L., Feghali T., Abdallah H. (2008). Academic Dishonesty in the Middle East: to- Face Courses. Computers & Education, 2019, vol. 131, pp. 49–59. DOI: 10.1007 / s11162-008- 9092-9

Ozdemir Oz A., Lane J. F., Michou A. (2016). Autonomous and Controlling Reasons Underlying Achievement Goals during Task Engagement: Their Relation to Intrinsic Motivation and Cheating. Educational Psychology, vol. 36, no 7, pp. 1160-1172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1109064

Maloshonok N., Shmeleva E. (2019). Factors Influencing Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students at Russian Universities. Journal of Academic Ethics, vol. 17, nr 3, рр. 313–329. doi 10.1007/s10805-019-9324-y. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-019-9324-y

Peled Y., Eshet Y., Barczyk C., Grinautski K. (2019). Predictors of Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students in Online and Face-to-Face Courses. Computers & Education, vol. 131, pp. 49–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.012

Rettinger D. A., Kramer Y. (2009). Situational and Personal Causes of Student Cheating. Research in Higher Education, vol. 50, no 3, pp. 293-313. DOI: 10.1007 / s11162-008-9116-5

Stone T. H., Jawahar I. M., Kisamore J. L. (2010). Predicting Academic Misconduct Intentions and Behaviors Using the Theory of Planned Behaviors and Personality. Basic and App lied Social Psychological, vol. 32, pp. 35-45. DOI: 10.1080 / 01973530903539895
Published
2021-11-03
How to Cite
Epanchintseva, G., Zubova, L., Kozlovskaya, T., Volosova, N., Lebedenko, A., & Bukaev, N. (2021). Academic student fraud in longitudinal research design . Journal of the University of Zulia , 12(35), 322-340. https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.35.19