Cognitive-behavioral aspects in the effectiveness of foreign language training of students of a non-linguistic university
Abstract
The article analyzes the impact of the cognitive-behavioral characteristics of students from a non-linguistic university on the level of success in learning a foreign language. The purpose of this article is to identify the patterns of the cognitive-behavioral parameters of decision-making in the conditions of choosing between various alternative reactions and their relationship with the effectiveness of foreign language training of students from a non-linguistic university. To study behavior patterns, the method of parameterizing was used such as an important component of any activity, as decision-making by modeling situations under conditions of free, probabilistic and conditional choice. The study involved freshmen and sophomores from a medical university, who were studying foreign languages. The simulation of the follow-up of the stimulus presented revealed a low level of voluntary attention in the students with low performance, especially in a situation of imposed rhythm. Naturally, there is the hypothesis that in this group, their own cognitive style is dependent on environmental conditions, so this must be taken into account in the learning process. The results obtained indicate that the presence of universal differentiated cognitive-behavioral strategies are important in the case of successful / unsuccessful command of a foreign language.
Downloads
References
Bukhvalova E.G. (2012). On the rhythm of English and German speech. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice. No. 2. Pp. 43-44.
Cutler A., Mehler J. (2002). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Psycholinguistics. Vol.1. Pp. 115–135.
Devyatkin A.A. (2009). The phenomenon of social attitude in the psychology of the twentieth century: monograph. Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad State University, 385 p.
Deryagina L.E., Sidorov P.I., Soloviev A.G. (2001). A method for assessing a behavioral response for professional selection and in screening studies. Patent for invention RUS 2208388 07.16.
Donati M. (2019). From active imagination to active life: at the roots of Jungian social activism. J Anal Psychol. Apr;64(2):225-243. Doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12480.
Egorova N.V. (2013). The importance of the psychological aspect in the study of foreign languages. An innovative context for the development of methods of teaching foreign languages, philology and intercultural communication materials of a scientific and practical conference with international participation. Editorial Board: V.A. Mayevskaya (editor-in- chief). Pp. 251-256.
Fedorova M.A. (2010). Didactic characteristics of the relationship between the concepts of “activity”, “educational activity”, “educational independent activity”. New in psychological and pedagogical research.No. 1 (17). Pp. 136-151.
Kostandov E.A. (2006). The value of the context of cognitive activity in the formation of unconscious visual attitudes. Russian physiological journal named after I.M. Sechenov. Vol. 92. No. 2. Pp. 164-178.
Khokhlova L.A. (2014). Psychophysiological connections in the structure of foreign language speech abilities. St. Petersburg, 7 STUDIO RIK. 255 p.
Khokhlova L.A., Deryagina L.E. (2009). Features of motivational behavior of students of the left and right hemisphere type in the process of learning foreign languages. Human Ecology, No. 5. Pp. 25-29.
Leontiev A.N. (1975). Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat.304 p. Matveeva L.Yu. (2015). Probabilistic prediction of sounding speech: to the problem statement. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. Vol. 11.No. 2. Pp. 216-220.
Mizen S. (2017). Preliminary thoughts on the neurobiology of innate unconscious structures and the psychodynamics of language acquisition. J Anal Psychol. Nov;62(5):756-770. Doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12362.
Prokopenko Yu.A. (2014). The need for the study of foreign languages as a result of globalization processes. Eurasian Union of Scientists. No. 5-4 (5). Pp. 58-60.
Potts R., Davies G., Shanks D.R. (2018). The benefit of generating errors during learning: What is the locus of the effect? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. Jul 19. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000637
Solodilova I.A. (2010). Communicative-pragmatic and cognitive approaches: unity and struggle of opposites. Social and Humanitarian Bulletin of the South of Russia. Krasnodar. Pp. 123 - 135.
Uznadze D.N. (2012). Psychology of installation. Psychology-classic. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2001. 416 p. Available at: http://www.psyworld.in.ua/.Accessed: 01.04.2012.
Zerr C.L., Berg J.J., Nelson S.M., Fishell A.K., Savalia N.K., McDermott K.B. (2018). Learning Efficiency: Identifying Individual Differences in Learning Rate and Retention in Healthy Adults. Psychol Sci. Sep;29(9):1436-1450. Doi: 10.1177/0956797618772540.
Copyright
The Revista de la Universidad del Zulia declares that it recognizes the rights of the authors of the original works published in it; these works are the intellectual property of their authors. The authors preserve their copyright and share without commercial purposes, according to the license adopted by the journal..
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)