Creativity and uncertainty tolerance as a resource for the psychological well-being of an individual
Abstract
The objective of the work was to establish the features of creativity and uncertainty tolerance in people with different levels of psychological well-being. An empirical study of the level of manifestation of psychological well-being of the studied group and the relationship between the components of creativity and tolerance for uncertainty was conducted. The study was conducted using a set of psychological techniques aimed at determining the level of psychological well-being, uncertainty tolerance, creativity and their components. Qualitative methods of data processing are used. The study found that people with high levels of psychological well-being have close relationships between the indicators of the components of psychological well-being, creativity and uncertainty tolerance. Instead, these relationships are significantly fewer among people with low levels of psychological well-being.
Downloads
References
Apaza-Panca, C. M., Maquera-Luque, P. J., Huanca-Frías, J. O., Supo-Quispe, L. A., Távara-Ramos, A. P., Dextre-Martínez, W. R., & Saldaña-Acosta, O. A. (2021). Factores psicosociales en estudiantes universitarios de Loreto, Ancash, Moquegua y Puno durante el confinamiento por el Covid-19, Perú. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(68), 51-69. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/35395
Archangelidi, O., & Mentzakis, E. (2017). Body-weight and psychological well-being in the UK general population. Public Health (Oxf), 5, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx054
Barbot, B., Hass, R. W., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019). Creativity assessment in psychological research: (Re) setting the standards. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000233
Barron, F. (2009). Creative person and creative process. NY: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
Bilopolyi, V. V., & Lazarenko, V. I. (2020). Psychological readiness for personal changes and tolerance for the uncertainty of the modern world of students of construction free economic education (SHEI PSACEA). Bulletin of Prydniprovs’ka State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2, 263-264. https://doi.org/10.30838/J.BPSACEA.2312.280420.16.617
Bluth, K., Campo, R. A., Futch, W. S., & Gaylord, S. A. (2017). Age and gender differences in the associations of self-compassion and emotional well-being in a large adolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 840-853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0567-2
Bradburn, N. M. (1965). Reports on happiness. A pilot study of Behaviour related to mental health. Chicago, USA: Aldine Publishing Company.
Cachioni, M., Delfino, L. L., Yassuda, M. S., Batistoni, S., de Melo, R. C., & da Costa Domingues, M. (2017). Subjective and psychological well-being among elderly participants of a University of the Third Age. Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia, 20(3), 340-351. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-22562017020.160179
Chapman, M., & Dammeyer, J. (2017). The significance of deaf identity for psychological well-being. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22(2), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enw073
Chiu, C.-Y., Lun, V. M., & Bond, M. H. (2018). Engaging in creative work: The influences of personal value, autonomy at work, and national socialization for self-directedness in 50 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116651336
DeRoma, V. M., Martin, K. M., & Kessler, M. L. (2003). The Relationship between tolerance for ambiguity and need for course structure. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(2), 104-109.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Dimitrova-Burlaienko, S. D. (2017). The genesis of the concept of "creative competence" in the context of psychological and pedagogical research. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats “Pedahohika ta psykholohiia”, 58, 35-42.
Evans, G. W. (2016). Childhood poverty and adult psychological well-being. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(52). 14949–14952. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604756114
Gilligan, M., Suitor, J. J., Nam, S., Routh, B., Rurka, M., & Con, G. (2017). Family networks and psychological well-being in midlife. Social Sciences. 6(3), 94-99. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6030094
Glăveanu, V. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-29. https://doi.org/10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02
González-Hernández, J., Gómez-López, M., Pérez-Turpin, J., Muñoz-Villena, A., & Andreu-Cabrera, E. (2019). Perfectly active teenagers. When does physical exercise help psychological well-being in adolescents? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224525
Hammond, J., Hancock, J., Martin, M., Jameson, S., & Mellor, D. (2017). Development of a new scale to measure ambiguity tolerance in veterinary students. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 44(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0216-040R
Hitchcott, P. K., Fastame, M. Ch., Ferrai, J., & Penna, M. P. (2017). Psychological well-being in Italian families: An exploratory approach to the study of mental health across the adult life Span in the Blue Zone. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 112-122. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i3.1416
Huang, D. M. (2006). Correlation study on reading anxiety and tolerance of ambiguity. Journal of Hubei Institute of Education, 23(11), 126-128.
Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2019). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kwan, L. Y.-Y., Leug, A. Y.-K., & Liou, S. (2018). Culture, creativity, and innovation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2, 231-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117753306
Li, E. L. (2006). Gender differences on tolerance of ambiguity. Journal of Sanmenxia Polytechnic (Comprehensive Edition), 5(3), 65-67.
Lubart, T. (2010). Children’s creative potential: an empirical study of measurement issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 388-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.006
Muñoz, O. (2019). Cultura, gestión pública, gerencia y sistema de relacionamiento. Revista Latinoamericana De Difusión Científica, 1 (1), 55-67. Recuperado a partir de http://www.difusioncientifica.info/index.php/difusioncientifica/article/view/6
Norton, R. W. (2002). Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39(6), 607-619. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa3906_11
Pakhol, B. Ye. (2017). Subjective and psychological well-being: modern and classical approaches, models and factors. Ukrainian psychological journal, 1(3), 80-104. http://doi.org/10.17721/upj.2017.1(3).7
Paskov, M. (2017). Does employment status affect psychological well-being? UK Data Service. http://blog.ukdataservice.ac.uk/employment-and-psychological-wellbeing
Preiss, D. D. (2019). Recent advances in the psychology of creativity. Stadies in Psychology, 40, 491-496. http://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2019.1679456
Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457417
Ryff, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Wilson, J. M., Weiss, A., & Shook, N. J. (2020). Mindfulness, self-compassion, and savouring: Factors that explain the relation between perceived social support and well-being. Personality and individual differences, 152, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109568
Copyright
The Revista de la Universidad del Zulia declares that it recognizes the rights of the authors of the original works published in it; these works are the intellectual property of their authors. The authors preserve their copyright and share without commercial purposes, according to the license adopted by the journal..
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)