Russia-Belarus integration interaction in the context of the development of the Eurasian Economic Union //Interacción de la integración Rusia-Bielorrusia en el contexto del desarrollo de la Unión Económica Euroasiática
Abstract
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of Russia-Belarus integration interaction. The authors consider the main areas of cooperation between these two countries and analyze the prospects for the development of bilateral relations. The importance of military and military-technical cooperation between Russia and Belarus is noted in the context of ensuring national security and joint counteraction against current challenges and threats. There is the important role of the Union State as a universal model of integration in the post-Soviet states. The authors adhere to a comprehensive methodology in the study of integration issues, which allowed us to significantly expand and deepen the analysis of the most significant and basic aspects of integration development in the context of the construction of the Union State, and the multidimensionality of the object of study determined the multiplicity of approaches to its study. The research methodology is based on a systematic approach, using the principle of historicism to analyze the above issues. The object of the study is the integration processes in the post-Soviet space, and the subject of the study is the system of political relations between Russia and Belarus in the context of the construction of a single Union State. The organizational and functional complexity of the object and subject of the study predetermined the pluralism of the methodological approaches used. The conceptual apparatus of the study is predetermined by the chosen methodological guidelines and is closely linked to the specific material being analyzed.
Resumen
El presente artículo está dedicado al análisis de la interacción en la integración entre Rusia y Bielorrusia. Los autores estudiaron las principales áreas de cooperación entre estos dos países y analizaron las perspectivas para el desarrollo de las relaciones bilaterales. La importancia de la cooperación militar y militar-técnica entre Rusia y Bielorrusia fue analizada en el contexto de garantizar la seguridad nacional y la lucha conjunta contra los desafíos y amenazas actuales. En el documento se valora el importante papel desempeñado por el Estado de la Unión como modelo universal de integración en los estados postsoviéticos. Los autores se adhieren a una metodología integral en el estudio de los problemas de integración, lo que permitió expandir y profundizar significativamente el análisis de los aspectos más significativos y básicos del desarrollo de la integración en el contexto de la construcción del Estado de la Unión, y la multidimensionalidad del objeto de estudio determinó su multiplicidad de enfoques. La metodología de investigación se basa en un enfoque sistemático, utilizando el principio del historicismo para analizar los problemas anteriores. El objeto del estudio son los procesos de integración en el espacio postsoviético, y el tema del estudio es el sistema de relaciones políticas entre Rusia y Bielorrusia en el contexto de la construcción de un único Estado de la Unión. La complejidad organizacional y funcional del objeto y sujeto del estudio predeterminó el pluralismo de los enfoques metodológicos utilizados. El sistema conceptual del estudio está predeterminado por las pautas metodológicas elegidas y está estrechamente relacionado con el material específico que se analiza.
Downloads
References
Afonina, V. N. (2007). Single economic space of Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan: virtual model and a likely prospect. Problems of the modern economy, 1(21), 51-54.
Akbergenov, I. A. (2009). Development of economic relations of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan in the 1990s: abstract of the dissertation of PhD in Historical Sciences. Moscow: RUDN University.
Akbergenov, I. A., Vasiliev, M. V., & Grebenichenko, S. F. (2005). Globalization and new tasks of foreign policy // International relations at the turn of the XX-XXI centuries. Materials of the First Interuniversity Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow: RUDN University.
Alpysbaeva, S. N., Kenzhebulat, M. K., Akmoldina, B. N., Beisengazin, K. S., & Tautenov, E. I. (2018). Impact of the Russian economy on macroeconomic indicators of Kazakhstan. Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation, Yearbook of INION RAS, 1(1), 16-19.
Arbatov, A. A. (2004a). European Russia: heresy, utopia, project? Moscow: Space 2000.
Arbatov, A. A. (2004b). Russia, Europe and the USA: a virtual triangle. Moscow: Committee "Russia in a United Europe".
Avakyan, S. A. (2001). Agreement between the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation on the creation of the Union State: constitutional and legal aspect. Bulletin of Moscow State University, series 11: Law, 1.
Bogaturov, A. D., Kosolapov, N. A., & Khrustalev, M. A. (2002). Essays on the theory and political analysis of international relations. Мoscow: NOFMO.
Chufrin, G. (2020). International Organizations of Economic Cooperation in the Post-Soviet Space. Problems of Eurasian Integration, 1.
Davydov, V. P., & Grebenichenko, S. F. (2009a). Russia's energy resources for the peaceful reconstruction of the world? Social and humanitarian knowledge, 1, 22-38;
Davydov, V. P., & Grebenichenko, S. F. (2009b). Will Russia make the right choice? Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 5, 3-22.
Davydov, V. P., & Grebenichenko, S. F. (2009c). World Crisis: “Alien” Goals and Interests of Russia. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 2, 3-26.
Delyagin, M. (2005). Loneliness of Russia: after the CIS. Russia and the Muslim world, 12, 18-27.
Dmitriev, E. I., & Khurs, M. N. (2002). Belarus: results and lessons of the presidential election. Minsk: Institute for Social, Economic and Political Studies.
Dmitriev, O. N., & Novikov, S. V. (2019). Economic Optimization of the Modular Structure of Complex Objects. Russian Engineering Research, 39(6), 503-506.
Drobizheva, L. M. (2003). Social problems of interethnic relations in post-Soviet Russia. Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Egorov V. G., & Savina, O. V. (2012). Common cultural and civilizational basis is a factor in the reintegration of the post-Soviet community. Observer, 12(275), 42–51.
Evzerov, R. Ya. (2002). World processes and the CIS. Free Thought - XXI, 11, 28-36.
Fedosov, B. N. (2006). Integration of Russia and Belarus. World economy and international relations, 6, 40–46.
Glazyev, S. Yu. (2001). On choosing a future development strategy. Free thought, 2, 4–23.
Glazyev, S. Yu. (2007). Development of the Russian economy in the context of global technological changes. Moscow: NIR.
Godin, Yu. F. (2001). Russia and Belarus on the path to unity: Problems of economic security of the Union State. Moscow: International Relations.
Golovchenko, R. (2013). “We are on the verge of the closest cooperation.” Interview with Roman Golovchenko, First Deputy Chairman of the Goskomvoenprom industry, to the correspondent of the newspaper “File-RF”. Retrieved at. https://vpk.gov.by/special/news/2792/
Grebenichenko, S. F. (2009). Transformation of the Commonwealth of Independent States at the beginning of the XXI century. CIS Yearbook: Problems, Search, Solutions. Мoscow, 24-47.
Grebenichenko, S. F. (2011). Multivariance of integration processes in the CIS. CIS Yearbook: Problems, Search, Solutions. Мoscow, 5-32.
Grebenichenko, S. F. (2012a). 20 years of the CIS: new integration acceleration. CIS Yearbook: Problems, Search, Solutions. Мoscow, 5-14.
Grebenichenko, S. F. (2012b). In the wake of integration. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 1, 20-42.
Grebenichenko, S. F., & Davydov, V. P. (2005a). Globalization, Russia's interests and the CIS crisis. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 5, 3-25.
Grebenichenko, S. F., & Davydov, V. P. (2007). Putin's Russia. Moscow: Alvian.
Grebenichenko, S. F., & Davydov, V. P. (2008). Energy resources and geopolitical interests of Russia. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Political Science, 4, 76-90.
Grebenichenko, S. F., & Sagindikov, R. E. (2014). Status and prospects of economic cooperation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 6, 23-28.
Grebenichenko, S. F., & Toktamysov, S. Zh. (2010) Central Asian Regional Economic Cooperation is an integration project for Greater Central Asia and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Evolution of the Commonwealth of Independent States: achievements and problems. Materials of the II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Мoscow, 75-85.
Grebenichenko, S. F., & Toktamysov, S. Zh. (2011). Central Asia and the geostrategy of Russia. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 1, 3–27.
Grebenichenko, S. F., & Toktamysov, S. Zh. (2013a). Metamorphoses of post-Soviet integration. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 2, 3-34.
Grebenichenko, S. F., & Toktamysov, S. Zh. (2013b). Integration Potential of the Post-Soviet Space for a Quarter Century: Problems and Prospects. Bulletin of RUDN University. Series: History of Russia, 2, 52-64.
Grebenichenko, S. F., & Toktamysov, S. Zh. (2013c). Integration Potential of the Post-Soviet Space for a Quarter Century: Problems and Prospects. Bulletin of the RUDN University (series: Russian history), 2, 52–63.
Grebenichenko, S.F., & Davydov V.P. (2005b). Russian Federation, its closest and most distant neighbors at the turn of the XX-XXI centuries. Moscow: RUDN University.
Ilyin, M. V. (2004). Types and varieties of world development policies. Political science, 1, 7-21.
Imankulov, A. V. (2005). International significance of the development of the oil and gas industry of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the 90s of the XX century: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of historical sciences. Moscow: RUDN University.
Irkhin, A. A. (2014). Reintegration of the post-Soviet space: models, conditions, forecasts. Retrieved at: https://cont.ws/@alex/63121
Kachalov, V. V. (2003). Problems of formation of the Union State of Belarus - Russia as a new form of integration. Abstract of a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Political Science. Moscow: Institute for Social and Political Studies, RAS.
Karbalevich, V. I. (2002). Paradoxes of Russian-Belarusian integration. Modern Europe, 2(10), 83-88.
Koktysh, K. (2004). Post-Soviet transformation of Belarus. World Economy and International Relations, 1, 37–50.
Konobeev, V. (2003). EU - Russia – Belarus. World Economy and International Relations, 5, 109-111.
Kornilovich, S. V. (2007). Conditions for the formation of an optimal currency zone within the EAEC. Problems of the modern economy, 1(21), 46-50.
Kozmenko, V. M. (2001). Foreign policy of Russia as a security factor. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: International Relations, 1, 121-129.
Kozmenko, V. M. (2009). Commonwealth of Independent States is a new form of interethnic integration. CIS: problems, search, solutions: 2010. Moscow, RUDN University, 11-22;
Kozmenko, V. M. (2012a). Priority lines of integration of Russia and Kazakhstan in 1991−2010. Bulletin of RUDN University. Series: History of Russia, 1, 102-109.
Kozmenko, V. M. (2012b). Russia in the CIS system: forms of cooperation. CIS Yearbook: Problems, Search, Solutions. Мoscow, 49-60.
Kozmenko, V. M., & Sagindikov, R. E. (2014). Customs Union of Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus - the basis of their economic security. Bulletin of RUDN University. Series: International relationships, 4, 87-94.
Legwold, R., & Wallander, S. A. (2004). Swords and screaming. National security economy of Belarus and Ukraine. American Academy of Humanities and Sciences. Cambridge: Interdialect.
Libman, A. M., & Kheyfets, B. A. (2011). Models of economic disintegration. Integration and disintegration. Eurasian economic integration, 2(11), 4-18
Lokosov, V. V. (2011). Union state of Belarus and Russia in the public opinion of the two countries. Minsk: Centre for System Analysis & Strategic Research The National Academy of Sciences of Belarus.
Lublinsky, V. V. (2005). Transformation of society and social policy in Western countries: The second half of XX - beginning of XXI century: Monograph. Moscow: RUDN University, 2005.
Luzyanin, S. G. (2007). Vladimir Putin's Eastern policy: Russia's return to the "Big East" (2004-2008). Moscow: AST.
Mihalisko, K. (1992). Belarus Moves to Assert Its Own Military Policy. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Research Report, 48.
Mihalisko, K. (1996). Belarus: Retreat to Authoritarianism. Democratic Changes and Authoritarian Reactions in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mikhaleva, N. A. (2002). Legal problems of creating the Union State of Russia and Belarus. State and law, 6, 14-21.
Moravcsik, A. (1995) Liberal Intergovemmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33(4), 611–628.
Novikov, S. V. (2019). Peculiarities of training of high-tech enterprise specialists under modern conditions. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 537(4).
Olcott, M. B. (1996). Central Asia's New States: Independence, Foreign Policy and Regional Security. United States Institute of Peace Press, 72(4), 862-863.
Pankov, V. (2007). Integration and disintegration in the post-Soviet space. World of change, 3, 128-142.
Pastukhova, N. B. (2000). Union of Russia and Belarus. History, present, prospects. Moscow: Book and business.
Podlesny, P. T. (1995). Geopolitical changes in Europe, Western policy and alternatives for Russia. Reports of the Institute of Europe RAS, 18, 92.
Rapota, G. A. (2005). EAEC: Economic Attraction: Collection of Articles. Мoscow: MUK SD.
Sarazhanov, A. M. (2002). Kazakh-Russian relations in the 90s of the XX century: experience, problems: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of historical sciences. Moscow: RUDN University.
Shakleina, T. A. (2000). Belarus in the foreign policy strategy of the Russian Federation: Discussions on the union of Russia and Belarus in the Russian political and academic community: geopolitical aspect. Moscow: Moscow Public Science Foundation: Publishing Center for Scientific and Educational Programs.
Shakleina, T. A. (2010). Belarus in the foreign policy strategy of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Moscow Public Science Foundation.
Shamishev, E. D., & Toktamysov, S. Zh. (2019). Eurasian Economic Union in the context of sanctions policy. Amazonia Investiga, 8(21), 474–482.
Shishkov, Yu. V. (2001). Integration processes at the threshold of the XXI century. Why CIS countries are not integrated. Moscow: 3 Tysyachiletie.
Shtol, V. V. (2012). Post-Soviet states: the search for self-identification and the costs of independence. Browser, 12, 29–41.
Sivitsky, A. (2020). “Union State is inscribed in the transit of Putin’s power.” Center for Strategic and Foreign Policy Research. Retrieved at http://csfps.by/ru/posts/20200122
Sobin, V. (2012). Military-technical cooperation between Russia and Belarus is gaining momentum. Military Review. Retrieved at http://topwar.ru/17151-voenno-tehnicheskoe-sotrudnichestvo-mezhdu-rossiey-i-belorussiey-nabiraet-oboroty.html
Suzdaltsev, A. I. (2009). Formation of the Russian policy towards Belarus (2005–2008). World Economy and International Relations, 3, 64-74.
Tatarintsev, V.M. (2011). Bilateral relations of Russia with the CIS countries: monograph. Moscow: East - West.
Timmerman, H. (2006). Special case of Belarus. Russia in global politics, 2(4).
Tkachev, D. Sh. (2006). Features of the functioning of institutions and social networks in the post-Soviet space. Political Studies, 1, 78-91.
Tsyganok, A. D. (2009). Military-technical cooperation between Russia and Belarus. Retrieved at https://tsiganok.ru/publications/esmi/doc/475
Ushkalova, D. I. (2008). Problems and prospects of economic integration of Russia and Belarus: the dissertation of the candidate of economic sciences: 08.00.14. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Vinokurov, E., Dzhadraliev, M., & Shcherbanin, Yu. (2009). EAEC International Transport Corridors: Faster, Cheaper, More. Industry review. Almaty: Eurasian Development Bank.
Vishnyakov, V. G. (2002). On the correlation of international and constitutional law (on the example of Belarus and Russia). Journal of Russian Law, 9, 11-21.
Zayko, L. F., Karbalevich, V. I., & Abramova, O. M. (1999). National-state interests of the Republic of Belarus. Minsk: Skakun.
Copyright
The Revista de la Universidad del Zulia declares that it recognizes the rights of the authors of the original works published in it; these works are the intellectual property of their authors. The authors preserve their copyright and share without commercial purposes, according to the license adopted by the journal..
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
