Assessment of the main reasons for the stagnation of territorial development in Russia

• Anzor V, Misakov Researcher at Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science
• Anzor Kh Sabanchiev Researcher at Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science
• Lola D. Sanginova Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation.
• Elena N. Danilevskaya Russian Economic University named after G.V. Plekhanov.
• Musa A. Eskiev Chechen State University

Keywords: Special economic zones, priority development territories, strategic management model.

Abstract

Globalization, accompanied by a continuous increase in competition, complicates the conditions for the development of market relations in the Russian Federation. The priority development territories should have functioned as a tool for industrial and productive reform. These territories and their special economic zones should have become territorial centers of innovative and industrial development. However, it does not happened. The article analyzes some of the main reasons for this situation in Russia.

References

Afashagova, S. R., Misakov, V. S., & Ivanov, A. A. (2014). Some tools to stimulate the innovative development of the business environment in the republics of the North-Caucasian Federal District. Bulletin of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5(61), 75-81.

Aloeva, Z. A., & Misakov, V. S. (2013). The development of adaptation and anti-crisis measures in terms of increasing competition. Bulletin of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 6-2(56), 30-35.

Andreev, V. A. (2016). Identification of organizational and functional models of priority development territories in the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 17(5), 631-641.

Baklanov, P. Ya. (2014). The territory of advanced development: concepts, structure, approaches to allocation. Regional Studies, 3, 12-19

Bodrunov, S. D. (2018). The territories of advanced development are the most important condition for the economic growth of Russia. Manager, 1, 2-7.

Bos, H. (1970). Housing. - M.: Progress, - 158 p.

Enright, M. J. (1993). The Ceographical Scope of Competitive Advantage. Stuck in the Pegim?, 117 p, 87-102.

Grinevich, D. (2019). Diagnosis – SEZ. News, May 30, 96(30328).

Krutikov, V. K. (2017). Advanced Development Territories. Kaluga: Publishing house of the ACF "Politon", - 148 p.

Kushbokova, R. Kh., Shamurzaev, Z. S., & Misakov, V. S. (2009). Some approaches to innovative potential management of an industrial enterprise. TerraEconomicus, 7(4-3), 123-125.

Misakov, A. V., Molamusov, Z. Kh., & Misakov, V. S. (2016). Some methods of investment activity modeling at industrial enterprises in terms of uncertainty. Economics and Entrepreneurship, 1-2(66), 606-610.

Myakisheva, E. A. (2015). Methodological support of strategic management for the territory of advanced social and economic development. Abstract: from the thesis by PhD in Economics. - Perm: PSNIU, - 24 p.

Perroux, F. (1968). Les investissementsmultinationaux et L`analise des poles de developpement et des poles d`integration. Revue Tiers-Monde, 9(34), 239-265.