The principle of the immunity of states in the international community with an emphasis on the case of Germany and Italy
Abstract
The concept of judicial state immunity has changed due to international developments. This transformation has taken place in line with the international developments, including the limitation of the concept of the sovereignty of the states. In the light of developments in international law, the sovereignty of the state is subject to several criteria, and today absolute sovereignty is unacceptable, and governments in many cases must be held accountable for their actions, so one of the most important of which is the observance of human rights standards. The basis of immunity is the sovereignty of the state. The purpose of this research is to study the principle of the immunity of countries in the international legal community. The main emphasis is on the subject of the Court’s ruling on the issue of Germany and Italy. The research has also been studied in descriptive and review methods and done in the library. In 2012, the International Court of Justice issued a verdict on the state immunity of the government in the German lawsuit against Italy. The Court reviewed the various aspects of the judicial immunity of the government and declared that the Italian Government issued a permit for a civil suit against Germany for violation of international humanitarian law by the Nazi Germany, the adoption of measures to enforce German property in Italy (Villa Vigoni), as well as by knowing the Greek judgments about the violation of humanitarian law in Greece by the Nazi Germany in the Italian courts, which it has breached its commitment to respect the immunities accorded by Germany to international law.
Downloads
References
Azizi, S. (2013). The Exceptions of Punitive Exceptions in the Law of Immunity of Governments in the Spotlight on the Impact of Qualification 2012, Useful Newsletter publication, Iran.
De Sena, P., & De Vittor, F. (2005). State immunity and human rights: The Italian supreme court decision on the Ferrini case, European Journal of International Law, 16(1), pp: 89-112.
Espósito, C. (2011). Jus Cogens and Jurisdictional Immunities of States at the International Court of Justice:“A Conflict Does Exist”. The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, 21(1), 161-174.
Hatami, M., Sadat Hosseini, F.(2016) State Judicial Immunity, Emphasizing on the Judgment of the International Court of Justice in the German Case Against Italy, Journal of Legal Justice, 8(9), pp: 10-15.
Kadkhodaee, A., Dai, A. (2011). Denial of State Immunity: An Analytical Study of US Laws and Regulations on the Elimination of Immunity from the Islamic Republic of Iran to Courts of this country, Tehran: Presidential Press and Publishing, Iran.
Mir Abbasi, S., Sadat Meidani, S. (2010) International Courts: International Judi- cial Discipline, Daily Issues, Review of Opinions and Documents, Tehran, Iran.
Nanda, V. P. (1998). Human Rights and Sovereign and Individual Immunities (Sove- reign Immunity, Act of State, Head of State Immunity and Diplomatic Immuni- ty)-Some Reflections, ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L., 5(1), pp: 460-467.
Pittrof, S. (2004). Compensation claims for human rights breaches committed by German armed forces abroad during the Second World War: Federal Court of Justice hands down decision in the Distomo case. German LJ, 5, 15.
Ramezani Ghavam Abadi, H., Farrokhi, R., Javadi Sharif, Kh. (2013) Immunity of the foreign government in national courts based on the ruling of the Interna- tional Court of Justice on the issue of the State immunity law, International Legal Journal, 3(8), pp: 29-33.
Sadat Meidani, S. (2015). The Right to Criminal Justice and Immunity of the State: Judgment of the International Court of Justice on the Differences between Germany and Italy, Quarterly Journal of Law, 6(9), pp: 12-15.
Thomas, K. R., & Small, J. (2003). Human Rights and State Immunity: Is there Immunity from Civil Liability for Torture?, Netherlands International Law Review, 50(1), pp: 1-30.
Zimmermann, A. (1994). Sovereign Immunity and Violations of International Jus Cogens-Some Critial Remarks, Mich. J. Int’l L., 16(1), pp: 430-433.
Copyright
The Revista de la Universidad del Zulia declares that it recognizes the rights of the authors of the original works published in it; these works are the intellectual property of their authors. The authors preserve their copyright and share without commercial purposes, according to the license adopted by the journal..
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)