Fraude de estudiantes académicos en el diseño de investigación longitudinal
Resumen
Los autores señalan la importancia de estudiar el fraude académico entre los estudiantes. Este fenómeno adquiere dimensiones a gran escala. Los autores están convencidos de que la solución del problema depende del conocimiento científico del retrato psicológico de los estudiantes. En el marco del enfoque personalista, los autores presentan una revisión de la literatura científica. Los autores identificaron un campo problemático de investigación empírica que revelaría la dinámica de las percepciones subjetivas de los estudiantes sobre una persona que recurre al fraude académico. Se formó una muestra del estudio, se presentó el cuestionario del autor. Se presentan para discusión los resultados de un estudio longitudinal de la dinámica de las percepciones subjetivas de las características cognitivas, las manifestaciones emocionales y los patrones de comportamiento de la personalidad de un estudiante. Para completar el retrato psicológico de los estudiantes, en el estudio se utilizaron técnicas de psicodiagnóstico válidas. Se presentan las etapas del estudio. El análisis de datos empíricos se orienta por los métodos basados en evidencia del tesauro estadístico. Los hallazgos del estudio revelaron las ideas de los estudiantes sobre la persona que recurre al plagio. En conclusión, los autores formularon programas paso a paso de apoyo psicológico para que los estudiantes se negaran a utilizar varios esquemas de fraude académico.
Descargas
Citas
Adebayo S. O. (2010). Correlation between Academic Cheating Behavior and Achievement Motivation. Nature and Science, vol. 8, no 12, pp. 130-134. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235752831_Correlation_between_Academic_Che ating_Behavior_and_achievement_motivation
Ajzen I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 32, pp. 665-683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
Anderman E. M., Griesinger T., Westerfield G. (1998) Motivation and Cheating during Early Adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 90, pp. 84-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.84
Becker D.A., Ulstad I. (2007). Gender Differences in Student Ethics: Are Females Really more Ethical? Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, no 2, pp. 77-91. Available at: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/p/pod/dod -idx/gender-differences- in-student-ethics-are-females-really-more.pdf?c=plag;idno=5240451.0002.009;format=pdf
Brandao M., Teixeira A. C. (2005). Crime without Punishment: An Update Review of the Determinants of Cheating Among University Students. Research, Work in Progress, no 191, pp. 1-31. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24111576_Crime_without_punishment_An_update_review_of_the_determinants_of_cheating_among_university_students
Bugrimenko A. G. (2006). Internal and External Motivation of Pedagogical University Students. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie, no 4, pp. 51-60 (in Russian). Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/files/1486/psyedu_2006_n4_Bugrimenko.pdf
Bunn D. N., Caudill S. B., Gropper D. M. (1992). Crime in the Classroom: An Economic Analysis of Undergraduate Student Cheating Behavior. Journal of Economic Education, vol. 23, no 3, pp. 197-207. DOI: 10.1080 / 00220485.1992.10844753
Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral science, 3(1), 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830030103
Chirikov I., Shmeleva E., Loyalka P. (2019). The Role of Faculty in Reducing Academic Dishonesty among Engineering Students. Studies in Higher Education, 2019, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1616169
Dremova O. V., Maloshonok N. G., Terentev E. A. (2020) Seeking Justice in Academia: Criticism and Justification of Student Academic Dishonesty Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal, nr 4 (158), рр. 366–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1987287
Eremeva N. V. Freedom, necessity and duty in the phenomenal and noumenal worlds in the teachings of M. Luther and the ethics of I. Kant [Electronic resource] N. V. Eremeva. Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences series. 201. No. 5. pp. 123-131. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2018.5.122. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2018.5.122
Ekman Paul (2010). Telling Lies. Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, And Marriage'272P, Saint Petersburg.
Freiburger T. L., Romain D. M., Randol B. M., Marcum C. D. (2017). Cheating Behaviors among Undergraduate College Students: Results from a Factorial Survey. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, vol. 28, no 2, pp. 222-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2016.1203010
Giluk T. L., Postlethwaite B. E. (2015). Big Five Personality and Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analytic Review. Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 72, pp. 59-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.027
Graham M. A., Monday J., O'Brien K, Steffen S. (1994). Cheating at Small Colleges: An Examination of Student and Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, vol. 35, pp. 255-260.
Grijalva T. C., Nowell C., Kerkvliet J. (2006). Academic Honesty and Online Courses. College Student Journal, vol. 40, no 1, pp. 180-185. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/101008/.
Grimes P. W. (2004). Dishonesty in Academics and Business: A Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Student Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 49, no 3, pp. 273-290. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/3146523/Dishonesty_in_Academics_and_Business_A_Cross_Cult ural_Evaluation_of_Student_Attitudes
Hard S. F., Conway J. M., Moran A. C. (2006). Faculty and College Student Beliefs about the Frequency of Student Academic Misconduct. Journal of Higher Education, vol. 77, no 6, pp. 1058–1080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778956
Harding T. S., Carpenter D. D., Finelli C. J. (2012). An Exploratory Investigation of the Ethical Behavior of Engineering Undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no 2, pp. 346-374. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1041.2&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Hensley L. C., Kirkpatrick K. M., Burgoon J. M. (2013). Relation of Gender, Course Enrollment, and Grades to Distinct Forms of Academic Dishonesty. Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 18, no 8, pp. 895-907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827641
Jones D. L. R. (2011). Academic Dishonesty: Are More Students Cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 141-150. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/110092/.
Kuntz J. R., Butler C. (2014). Exploring Individual and Contextual Antecedents of Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Cheating and Plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, vol. 24, no 6, pp. 478-494. DOI: 10.1080 / 10508422.2014.908380
McCabe D. L., Feghali T., Abdallah H. (2008). Academic Dishonesty in the Middle East: to- Face Courses. Computers & Education, 2019, vol. 131, pp. 49–59. DOI: 10.1007 / s11162-008- 9092-9
Ozdemir Oz A., Lane J. F., Michou A. (2016). Autonomous and Controlling Reasons Underlying Achievement Goals during Task Engagement: Their Relation to Intrinsic Motivation and Cheating. Educational Psychology, vol. 36, no 7, pp. 1160-1172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1109064
Maloshonok N., Shmeleva E. (2019). Factors Influencing Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students at Russian Universities. Journal of Academic Ethics, vol. 17, nr 3, рр. 313–329. doi 10.1007/s10805-019-9324-y. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-019-9324-y
Peled Y., Eshet Y., Barczyk C., Grinautski K. (2019). Predictors of Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students in Online and Face-to-Face Courses. Computers & Education, vol. 131, pp. 49–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.012
Rettinger D. A., Kramer Y. (2009). Situational and Personal Causes of Student Cheating. Research in Higher Education, vol. 50, no 3, pp. 293-313. DOI: 10.1007 / s11162-008-9116-5
Stone T. H., Jawahar I. M., Kisamore J. L. (2010). Predicting Academic Misconduct Intentions and Behaviors Using the Theory of Planned Behaviors and Personality. Basic and App lied Social Psychological, vol. 32, pp. 35-45. DOI: 10.1080 / 01973530903539895
Copyright
La Revista de la Universidad del Zulia declara que reconoce los derechos de los autores de los trabajos originales que en ella se publican; dichos trabajos son propiedad intelectual de sus autores. Los autores preservan sus derechos de autoría y comparten sin propósitos comerciales, según la licencia adoptada por la revista..
Esta obra está bajo la licencia:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)