Theoretical analysis of dynamic teams: Evolution and perspectives
Resumen
This study aims to describe and analyze scientific production in relation to dynamic teams. Through bibliometric analysis, this article explores the most studied topics, the relationships between authors and their citations. The results show that the interest of researchers, according to the number of citations, is directed towards the fields of Psychology, Business and Organizational Behavior. Likewise, a certain dispersion is observed in the topics studied and there is a lack of consensus on the concept of a dynamic team. In conclusion, the present study provides an overview of how the literature in this scientific field has developed. Future research can be directed to the study of dynamic teams in different contexts, which could deepen the analysis for a definition of the concept of dynamic team and benefit from the multidisciplinary nature of the field, as well as facilitate the transfer of ideas between different fields.
Descargas
Citas
Araújo, D., & Davids, K. (2016). Team synergies in sport: Theory and measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01449
Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1993). Membership Matters: How member change and continuity affect small-group structure, process, and performance. Small Group Research, 24(3), 334-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496493243004
Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Membership Dynamics in Groups at Work: A theoretical Framework. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews (Vol. 17, pp. 373-411). Elsevier.
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Sage Publications.
Arslan, G., & Yüksel, S. (2017). Decentralized q-learning for stochastic teams and games. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62(4), 1545-1558. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.07924
Bachrach, D. G., Lewis, K., Kim, Y., Patel, P. C., Campion, M. C., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2019). Transactive memory systems in context: A meta-analytic examination of contextual factors in transactive memory systems development and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 464-493. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000329
Bedwell, W. L. (2019). Adaptive team performance: The influence of membership fluidity on shared team cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02266
Bedwell, W. L., Ramsay, P. S., & Salas, E. (2012). Helping fluid teams work: A research agenda for effective team adaptation in healthcare. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2(4), 504-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-012-0177-9
Bell, S. T., Brown, S. G., & Weiss, J. A. (2018). A conceptual framework for leveraging team composition decisions to build human capital. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.06.003
Benishek, L. E., & Lazzara, E. H. (2019). Teams in a New Era: Some considerations and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1006. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01006
Blanchet, C., & Michinov, E. (2016). Instability in work teams: What effects on team effectiveness? Travail Humain, 79(4), 309-337. https://doi.org/10.3917/th.794.0309
Borner, K., Chen, C. & Boyack, K. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 37(1), 179-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
Braun, M. T., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Brown, T. A., & DeShon, R. P. (2020). Exploring the dynamic team cohesion-performance and coordination-performance relationships of newly formed teams. Small Group Research, 51(5), 551-580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420907157
Bunderson, J. S., Van der Vegt, G. S., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2013). Status inertia and member replacement in role-differentiated teams. Organization Science, 25(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0835
Bush, J. T., LePine, J. A., & Newton, D. W. (2018). Teams in transition: An integrative review and synthesis of research on team task transitions and propositions for future research. Human Resources Management Review, 28(4), 423-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.06.005
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
Chen, Y., Nyemba, S., & Malin, B. (2012). Detecting anomalous insiders in collaborative information systems. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 9(3), 332-344. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2012.11
Choi, H.-S., & Thompson, L. (2005). Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.06.003
Cobo, M. J., Lopez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Delice, F., Rousseau, M., & Feitosa, J. (2019). Advancing teams research: What, when, and how to measure team dynamics over time. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1324. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01324
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Dutta, R., & Barua, R. (2008). Provably secure constant round contributory group key agreement in dynamic setting. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 54(5), 2007-2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2008.920224
Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. Jossey-Bass
Finn, L., Clay, A. T., & Creaden, J. (2022). Establishing an advanced practice provider resource team: An agile staffing model. Nurse Leader, 20(3), 316-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2021.12.014
Fodor, O. C., Curseu, P. L., & Meslec, N. (2021). Multiple team membership, performance, and confidence in estimation tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 658827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658827
Gino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Todorova, G. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.002
Hackman, J. R., Brousseau, K. R., & Weiss, J. A. (1976). Interaction of task design and group-performance strategies in determining group effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 350-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90021-0
He, J.-H., Xie, X.-Y., Ling, C.-D., & Feng, W. (2023). Look back, move forward: A bibliometric review of team literature. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 27(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000192
Hofstede, G. J. (2015). Culture’s causes: The next challenge. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 22(4), 545-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCM-03-2015-0040
Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530-545. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000103
Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987-1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587
Huckman, R. S., Staats, B. R., & Upton, D. M. (2009). Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Science, 55(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0921
Huckman, R. S., & Staats, B. R. (2010). Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations. Working Paper No. 09-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1421867
Jansen, A. E., & Searle, B. J. (2021). Diverse effects of team diversity: A review and framework of surface and deep-level diversity. Personnel Review, 50(9), 1838-1853. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2019-0664
Joshi, K., Hernandez, J., Martinez, J., AbdelFattah, K., & Gardner, A. K. (2018). Should they stay or should they go now? Exploring the impact of team familiarity on interprofessional team training outcomes. American Journal of Surgery, 215(2), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.048
Kane, A. A. (2009). Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: Knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organization Science, 21(3), 643-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1410114
Kane, A. A., & Rink, F. (2015). How newcomers influence group utilization of their knowledge: Integrating versus differentiating strategies. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 19(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000024
Kerrissey, M. J., Satterstrom, P., & Edmondson, A. C. (2020). Into the fray: Adaptive approaches to studying novel teamwork forms. Organizational Psychology Review, 10(2), 62-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620912833
Kneisel, E. (2020). Team reflections, team mental models and team performance over time. Team Performance Management, 26(1/2), 143-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-09-2018-0061
Konradt, U., Otte, K.-P., Schippers, M. C., & Steenfatt, C. (2016). Reflexivity in teams: A review and new perspectives. Journal of Psychology, 150(2), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1050977
Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 270-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614533586
Lacerenza, C. N., Marlow, S. L., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2018). Team development interventions: Evidence-Based approaches for improving teamwork. American Psychologist, 73(4), 517-531. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000295
LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
Lewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., & Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.005
Li, J., Meyer, B., Shemla, M., & Wegge, J. (2018). From being diverse to becoming diverse: A dynamic team diversity theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(8), 956-970. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2272
Li, J., & Gevers, J. M. P. (2018). Dynamics between member replacement and team performance: The role of members' relative attributes. Applied Psychology, 67(1), 61-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12116
Lynch, J. (2019). Advertising industry evolution: agency creativity, fluid teams and diversity. An exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(9-10), 845-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2019.1635188
Mahajan, A., & Teneketzis, D. (2009). Optimal design of sequential real-time communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 55(11), 5317-5338. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2009.2030462
Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., Paoletti, J., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E. (2018). Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach?: A meta-analysis of team communication and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 145-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.08.001
Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., Van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017). A century of work teams in the journal of applied psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452-467. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000128
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503014
Mathieu, J. E., Wolfson, M. A., & Park, S. (2018). The evolution of work team research since hawthorne. American Psychologist, 73(4), 308-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000255
McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, Interaction and Performance (TIP) - A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22(2), 147-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222001
McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2007). Temporal matters in the study of work groups in organizations. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 10(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10887150709336609
Miller, D. L. (2003). The stages of group development: A retrospective study of dynamic team processes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l´administration, 20(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2003.tb00698.x
Mortensen, M., & Haas, M. R. (2018). Rethinking teams: From bounded membership to dynamic participation. Organization Science, 29(2), 341-355. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1198
Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
Nájera-Sánchez, J.-J., Mora-Valentín, E.-M., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & Moura-Díez, P. (2019). Mapping the conceptual structure of environmental management: A co-word analysis. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 69-80. https://doi.org/10.3846/BTP.2019.07
Otten, K., Buskens, V., Przepiorka, W., & Ellemers, N. (2021). Cooperation between newcomers and incumbents: The role of normative disagreements. Journal of Economic Psychology, 87, 102448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102448
Park, S., Grosser, T. J., Roebuck, A. A., & Mathieu, J. E. (2020). Understanding work teams from a network perspective: A review and future research directions. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1002-1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901573
Pevehouse, J. C. W., Nordstrom, T., McManus, R. W., & Jamison, A. S. (2020). Tracking organizations in the world: The Correlates of War IGO Version 3.0 datasets. Journal of Peace Research, 57(3), 492-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319881175
Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Marques-Quinteiro, P., Navarro, J., & Rico, R. (2018). Teams as complex adaptive systems: Reviewing 17 years of research. Small Group Research, 49(2), 135-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417713849
Ren, F., Zhang, M., Soetanto, D., & Su, X. (2012). Conceptual design of a multi-agent system for interconnected power systems restoration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27(2), 732-740. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2177866
Roberts, A. P. J., Webster, L. V., Salmon, P. M., Flin, R., Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., Read, G. J. M., & Stanton, N. A. (2022). State of science: Models and methods for understanding and enhancing teams and teamwork in complex sociotechnical systems. Ergonomics, 65(2), 161-187.
Ryu, S., & Moon, C. W. (2011). The effect of group-orientation culture on inter-organizational cooperation mechanisms. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 15(4), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.19030/ijmis.v15i4.615
Salazar, M. R., Lant, T. K., Fiore, S. M., & Salas, E. (2012). Facilitating innovation in diverse science teams through integrative capacity. Small Group Research, 43(5), 527-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412453622
Trainer, H. M., Jones, J. M., Pendergraft, J. G., Maupin, C. K., & Carter, D. R. (2020). Team membership change “events”: A review and reconceptualization. Group & Organization Management, 45(2), 219-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120910848
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small-groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100
Valentine, M. A., Tan, T. F., Staats, B. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2018). Fluid teams and knowledge retrieval: Scaling service operations. M&Som - Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21(2), 346-360. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0704
Van der Vegt, G. S., Bunderson, S., & Kuipers, B. (2010). Why turnover matters in self-managing work teams: Learning, social integration, and task flexibility. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1168-1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309344117
Wageman, R., Gardner, H., & Mortensen, M. (2012). The changing ecology of teams: New directions for teams research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1775
Wolfson, M. A., D'Innocenzo, L., & Bell, S. T. (2022). Dynamic team composition: A theoretical framework exploring potential and kinetic dynamism in team capabilities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 1889-1906. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001004
Wu, S., Nijstad, B. A., & Yuan, Y. (2022). Membership change, idea generation, and group creativity: A motivated information processing perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(5), 1412-1434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221999457
Zhu, X. S., Wolfson, M. A., Dalal, D. K., & Mathieu, J. E. (2021). Team decision making: The dynamic effects of team decision style composition and performance via decision strategy. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1281-1304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320916232
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.