The Effectiveness Of Design Pluralism At Internal Space Levels

• Mohammed Jarallah Tewfik

Palabras clave: multilateralism, design, design pluralism, levels of inner space

Resumen

The interior design is the actual example of achieving the requirements of internal space, and on this basis these spaces have been of interest to inter- nal designers. For further innovation and renovation based on innovation in design pluralism, as a result of the synergy of this environmental level, the design process has enriched and developed designs as a result of the interac- tion of the internal designer’s self-abilities factor based on the study of the privacy of objective capabilities that govern the formulation of innovative and renewable design arts over time Which has endeavoured to achieve the effec- tive role of design pluralism as a key role for design relationships as a result of the interlocking between the creative methods of internal designers in order to provide an internal environment for the recipient within a coherent func- tional and aesthetic unit, The interaction of design pluralism has a clear effect on the internal design of inner spaces, and this depends on the skill of design efficiency as it is a means of expression that delivers its message to the recip- ient, so the internal designer must follow in his design speech mechanisms a specific model to achieve the desired goal. This is why it is not done without the ability, competence and awareness of the design process, and due to the importance of this issue the problem of research has been formulated by the following question:How can it be achieved by the effectiveness of design pluralism in the levels of internal space? The main objective of the research is to provide a clear study on the concept of the effectiveness of design pluralism, as it is the intellectual basis for building the hotel’s interior design, and in light of this, the goal of research has been set by revealing the effective- ness of design pluralism at the internal space levels, while its spatiotem- poral boundaries at the internal spaces resampled in: (Hilton Pattaya Ho- tel ,Thailand, 2011), and (Hilton Garden Inn Isparta, Turkey, 2015), the research study will also include both the conceptual framework, with the subject of research procedures, which are based on the methodology of the analytical narrative (content analysis). The research community will focus on adopting a more selective, bronchial approach to the results of the research study.

Citas

Ahmed Hafez, “Design in Contemporary Plastic Art”, Makhemer Press, Cairo, 1970, p. 20.

Al-Hajem, Mazen Ahmed: (The impact of the urban body in the sense of place), Freedom House for printing and publishing, Baghdad, 1995, p. 41.

Arnhim, Rodolf. H-Desig Griteria far decition-USA,1979, p.134.

Baker, Geoffrey: Design Strategies in Architecture, John wiley and Sons, 1980, p.65.

Brawne, Michael;” From Idea to Building; Issues in Architecture” Ox- ford, Butter worthe, Heinemann LTD, 1992, p.68-90.

Broadbent, Geoffery “Building Design as Iconic Sign System in Signs, Symbols and Architecture’; John Willey &sons-1980, p.329.

Ezzat Hassan: Visual Phenomenology and Internal Design, I 3, Egypt Press, 1982, p.56.

Himmelblau, Coop, On the Edge, Architectural design, Academy Edi- tions, London, 1995, p.87.

Ibrahim Madkour: The Philosophical Glossary, Arabic Language Com- plex, General Authority for Printing Affairs, Cairo, 1983, p.45.

Ismail Shawki, Art and Design, Faculty of Art Education, Helwan University, Al-Omrania Press, 1999, p. 212.

Jencks, Charles, “The Aesthetics of Engineering Architectural De- sign”; 1987, p.87-88.

Kurtich, Johan, and Eakin, Garret, “ Interior Architecture “, Van Nos- trand Reinhold, New York, 1993, p.76.

Lalvani, Haresh, “Meta Architecture “, Article in, “Architecture and Science “, edited by, Di Cristina, Giuseppa, Wiley – Academy, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Italy, 2002, p.87.

Piene Von, “ Elements of Architecture: From Form to Place “, Lon- don: E and FN Spon, Champman and Hall, 1992, p.32.

Qassim Hussein Saleh, Creativity in Art, Ministry of Higher Educa- tion and Scientific Research, Baghdad University, Faculty of Fine Arts, Baghdad, 1988, p. 99.

Rapport, Amos and Kantor, Robert”, Complexity and Ambiguity in Environmental Design”, A.I.P. Journal, July, 1970, p.113.

Rowe, Peter “Design thinking”; The M.I.T. Press; Cambridge;1988, p.156.

Semper, Gottefried, Der stil, “ Architectural Design “, London, 1981.p.55-56.

Unwin, Simon,” Analyzing Architecture”; Routledge, London, 1997, p78

Wittkower, Rudolf, Architectural Principles, Academy editions, Lon- don, 4th ed, 1973, p.75-76.

Yahya Hamouda, Architectural Formation, Arabic Publishing House, Beirut, 1999. pp. 19-20.