School Museum as A Center of The Educational Environment in The Cadet Cossack Corps
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify and scientifically substantiate the potential of the school profile museum as a scientific and creative center for children's associations in mastering the spiritual, moral and artistic values of the folk traditional culture. The article presents a model of the educational environment, built on the experimental program of scientific and creative children's associations at the School Museum "History and Traditional Culture of the Cossacks" on the basis of the Municipal Budgetary Educatio- nal Institution of Secondary School (MBEI SES) No. 22 "Cadet Cossack School", Chelyabinsk. The urgency of the appeal to national traditions, national-cultural values as a means of training and education is substantia- ted; the attention is focused on the culture of the Russian Cossacks and as a regional component – the Orenburg Cossack army. The tasks of studying and reuniting Cossack traditions with the conditions of modern education are set, problems in creating the educational environment in the cadet corps are identified. As a result of deductive chronological and etymological analy- sis of the term “environment”, it is argued that it is necessary to centralize the study, preservation and reproduction of phenomena and facts of traditional culture at the school museum, which, by virtue of its name, is intended to become a foundation, accumulator of popular knowledge and experience turning into the activity form of children's scientific and creative associations for familiarizing the Cadets with historical and cultural heritage. It covers the goals and objectives, features of the program and the main provisions, the directions of students' activities (research, museum studies and creative), types of cadet associations, methods and educational technologies. A model of the educational environment is created and tested, in the center of which is a school museum.References
Berry, J.W., Poortings, Y.H., Segall, M.H., Dasen, P.R. (2002). Cross-cultural Psychology: Research and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 588. Cathedralness. (n.d.). Retrieved September 10, 2018, from https://hrono.ru/organ/ukazatel/sobornost.php.
Chernoushek, M. (1989). Psychology of the living environment. Mankind on the threshold of the XXI century. Moscow: Mysl', 174.
Chistov, K.V. (1986). Folk traditions and folklore. Moscow: Nauka, 108. Dictionaries and encyclopedias on Akademik (n.d.). Dahl Dictionary. Retrie- ved September 7, 2018, from https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc2p/358910. Duncan, O.D., Schnore, L.F. (1969). Cultural, behavioral and ecological perspectives in the study of social organization. Amer. J. Sociology, 65(2), 132-136.
FSES Requirements for the Subject-Developing Environment. (n.d.). Retrie-
ved September 7, https://dmdou4.edumsko.ru/activity/fgos/post/77432.
Gibson, J. (1988). Environmental approach to visual perception: trans. from English. Gen ed. and introd. art. of A. D. Logvinenko. Moscow: Progress. Heidmets, M. (1980). Socio-psychological problems of the living environment (aspect of personalization of the environment). In Mikkin, H. (Ed.) Chelovek. Sreda. Obshchenie. Tallin: Tallinn Pedagogical Institute. E. Wilde, 136.
Hovhannisyan, L.G. (2003). School center of folklore (from the experience of organization and formation of folklore activities. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii, February 21-23, 2003. Chelyabinsk: Izd-vo ChGAKI, 377-380
Kashina, N.I. (2016). Acquisition of traditional cultural and artistic values by children and young people (on the material of musical culture of the Cossacks). Ekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University.
Ketova, L.M. (2012). Museum pedagogy as innovative educational technolo- gy. Man in the world of culture, 4, 76-81.
Kulev, A.V. (2000). Fundamentals of folk culture. Vologda: Izd. center VIRO, 174.
Leff, H.L. (1980). Experience, Environment and Human Potentials. New York: Oxford University Press, 576.
Lillard, A., Else-Quest, N. (2006). Evaluating Montessori. Science, 29, 1893- 1894.
Montessori, М. (1964). The Montessori Method. New York: Schocken. Musokhranova, M.B., Belimova, L.M. (2005). To the question of the essence of the concept of "objective environment". Omskii nauchnyi vestnik. Omsk: Izdatel'stvo Omskii gosudarstvennyi tekhnicheskii universitet, 1(30), 58-61. Ovanesyan, L.G. (2009). The program of scientific and creative children's associations at the school museum "History and Traditional Culture of the South Ural Cossacks" for 1-11 cadet classes (platoons). Chelyabinsk, 51. Rubtsov, V.V., Ivoshina, T.G. (2002). Designing a developing educational environment of the school. Мoscow: Izd-vo MGPPU, 272.
Shibanov, N.S. (2006). Russian Cossacks. In three parts. Izdat-vo: ZAO Chel- yabinskaya mezhraionnaya tipografiya, 784.
Shpikalova, T.Ya., Baklanova, T.I., Ershova, L.V. (2006). The concept of ethnocultural education in the Russian Federation. Shuya: Izdatel'stvo Vest' GOU VPO ShGPU, 4.
The Law of the Russian Federation on Education No. 3266-1. (July 10, 1992). Bulletin of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation No. 30, Item 1797.
Yasvin, V.A. (2001). Educational environment: from modeling to design. Moscow: Smysl, 365.
Yasvin, V.A. (2010). School as a developing environment. Moscow: Institut nauchnoi informatsii i monitoringa RAO, 332.
Zetkina, I.A. (2016). Museum of educational institution. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsial'nye, gumanitarnye, mediko-biologicheskie nauki, 18(1(2)), 162.