Aspirin in primary cardiovascular prevention: the two faces of the coin and the importance of the Number Needed to Treat: a systematic review and meta- analysis.

Aspirina en prevención cardiovascular primaria. Las dos caras de la moneda y la importancia del número necesario a tratar. Revisión sistemática y metanálisis.

Palabras clave: aspirina, enfermedad cardiovascular, prevención primaria, riesgo hemorrágico, número necesario a tratar

Resumen

La aspirina ha sido un tratamiento esencial para la prevención primaria de las enfermedades cardiovasculares (ECV). Varios estudios controlados aleatorizados no apoyan el uso rutinario de la aspirina principalmente debido a su asociación con el riesgo de sangrado. Esta revisión sistemática tiene como objetivo evaluar la prescripción de aspirina basada en el Número Necesario para Tratar (NNT) y el Número Necesario para Dañar (NNH). Esta combinación proporciona una buena medida del esfuerzo para evitar un resultado desfavorable, sopesado frente a los posibles riesgos asociados. Se realizó una búsqueda de estudios aleatorios sobre el tratamiento con aspirina en dos períodos separados. En el análisis se incluyeron cuatro estudios de 1988 a 1998 y seis de 2001 a 2018 (157 060 participantes). El criterio principal de valoración fue un resultado compuesto de infarto de miocardio no mortal (NFMI), accidente cerebrovascular isquémico no mortal (NFIS) y mortalidad cardiovascular. La hemorragia mayor fue el punto final de seguridad. Se calculó la reducción del riesgo absoluto (RAR), el NNT y el NNH, junto con el riesgo relativo (RR) y el IC del 95% de cada criterio principal de valoración. Los resultados de todos los estudios incluidos (10) mostraron un beneficio neto con el tratamiento con aspirina para NFMI (NNT= 383) y el resultado compuesto (NNT=445) con una reducción significativa del riesgo relativo del 20% (p=0,003; I2= 0%) y 10% (p<0,001; I2 = 0%), respectivamente. Hubo un incremento relevante del 60% en el riesgo de sangrado (p<0,0001, NNH=208; I2 = 3%). El NNT y el NNH pueden constituir medidas de eficacia y riesgo en la toma de decisiones clínicas compartidas. Sin embargo, es importante establecer consistentemente que el riesgo-beneficio de los pacientes debe ser individualizado, y no una guía clínica para todos.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Gilberto Vizcaino, Universidad del Zulia , Maracaibo, Venezuela.

Instituto de Investigaciones Clínicas “Dr. Américo Negrette”, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Zulia , Maracaibo, Venezuela.

Jesús Weir Medina, Instituto Hematológico de Occidente, Maracaibo, Venezuela.

Instituto Hematológico de Occidente/Banco de Sangre del Estado Zulia, Maracaibo, Venezuela.

Citas

Steering Committee of the Physicians’ Health Study Research Group. Final report on the aspirin component of the on going Physicians’ Health Study. N Engl J Med 1989;321(3):129-135. doi: 10.1056/nejm198907203210301.

Peto R, Gray R, Collins R, Wheatley K, Hennekens C, Jamrozik K, Warlow C, Hafner B, Thompson E, Norton S, Gilliland J, Doll R. Randomised trial of prophylactic daily aspirin in British male doctors. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988;296(6618):313- 6. doi:1136/bmj.296.6618.313.

Eidelman RS, Hebert PR, Weisman SM, Hennekens CH. An update on aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(17):2006- 10. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.17.2006.

The Medical Research Council’s General Practice Research Framework. Thrombosis prevention trial: a randomized trial of low-intensity oral anticoagulation with warfarin and low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of ischemic heart disease in men at increased risk Lancet 1998;351(9098):233-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11475-1.

Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, Dahlöf B, Elmfeldt D, Julius S, Ménard J, Rahn KH, Wedel H, Westerling S, for the HOT Study Group. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomized trial. Lancet 1998;351:1755-1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04311-6.

Collaborative Group of the Primary Prevention Project. Low-dose aspirin and vitamin E in people at cardiovascular risk: a randomized trial in general practice. Lancet 2001;357:89- 95. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03539-X.

US Preventive Services Task Force. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:157-160. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00015.

Pearson TA, Blair SN, Daniels SR, Eckel RH, Fair JM, Fortmann SP, Franklin BA, Goldstein LB, Greenland P, Grundy SM, Hong Y, Miller NH, Lauer RM, Ockene IS, Sacco RL, Sallis Jr JF, Smith Jr SC, Stone NJ, Taubert KA. AHA Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke: 2002 Update: Consensus Panel Guide to Comprehensive Risk Reduction for Adult Patients Without Coronary or Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Diseases. American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. Circulation 2002;106(3):388-391. doi: 1161/01.cir.0000020190.45892.75.

Diez-Ewald M, Arocha F, Vizcaíno G. Effect of low-dose of aspirin on platelet function from patients at risk of myocardial infarction (Spanish). Invest Clín 1984;25:125-137.

Berger JS, Roncaglioni MC, Avanzini F, Pangrazzi I, Tognoni G, Brown DL. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men: a sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2006;295:306– 313. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.3.306.

Zuern CS, Lindemann S, Gawaz M. Platelet function and response to aspirin: gender-specific features and implications for female thrombotic risk and management. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009;35(3):295- 306. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1222608.

Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bezanson JL, Dolor RJ, Lloyd-Jones DM, Newby LK, Piña IL, Roger VL, Shaw LJ, Zhao D, Beckie TM, Bushnell C, D’Armiento J, Kris-Etherton PM, Fang J, Ganiats TG, Gomes AS, Gracia CR, Haan CK, Jackson EA, Judelson DR, Kelepouris E, Lavie CJ, Moore A, Nussmeier NA, Ofili E, Oparil S, Ouyang P, Pinn VW, Sherif K, Smith SC Jr, Sopko G, Chandra-Strobos N, Urbina EM, Vaccarino V, Wenger NK. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women–2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:1243–1262. doi: 10.1161/ CIR.0b013e31820faaf8.

US Preventive Services Task Force, Davidson, KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Chelmow D, Coker TR, Davis EM, Donahue KE, Jaén CR, Krist AH, Kubik M, Li L, Ogedegbe G, Pbert L, Ruiz JM, Stevermer J, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2022;327(16):1577–1584. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.4983.

Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, Cooney MT, Corrà U, Cosyns B, Deaton C, Graham I, Hall MS, Hobbs FDR, Løchen ML, Löllgen H, Marques-Vidal P, Perk J, Prescott E, Redon J, Richter DJ, Sattar N, Smulders Y, Tiberi M, van der Worp HB, van Dis I, Verschuren WMM, Binno S. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J 2016;37:2315–2381. doi: 1093/eu-rheartj/ehw106.

Citrome L, Ketter TA. When does a difference make a difference? Interpretation of number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed. Int J Clin Pract 2013;67(5):407- 411. doi:10.1111/ijcp.12142.

Zheng SL, Roddick AJ. Association of as- pirin use for primary prevention with cardiovascular events and bleeding events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2019;22;321(3):277-287. doi: 1001/ jama.2018.20578.

Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomized. Lancet 2009; 373:1849–1860. doi: 1016/S0140-6736(09)60503-1.

Mahmoud AN, Gad MM, Elgendy AY, Elgendy IY, Bavry AA. Efficacy and safety of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2019;40(7):607- 617. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy813.

Ridker PM, Cook NR, Lee IM, Gordon D, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Buring JE. A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med 2005;352(13):1293-1304. doi:10.1056/N EJMoa050613.

Ikeda Y, Shimada K, Teramoto T, Uchiyama S, Yamazaki T, Oikawa S, Sugawara M, Ando K, Murata M, Yokoyama K, Ishizuka N. Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in Japanese patients 60 years or older with atherosclerotic risk factors: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014;312(23):2510- 2520. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.15690.

McNeil JJ, Wolfe R, Woods RL, Tonkin AM, Donnan GA, Nelson MR, Reid CM, Lockery JE, Kirpach B, Storey E, Shah RC, Williamson JD, Margolis KL, Ernst ME, Abhayaratna WP, Stocks N, Fitzgerald SM, Orchard SG, Trevaks RE, Beilin LJ, Johnston CI, Ryan J, Radziszews- ka B, Jelinek M, Malik M, Eaton CB, Brauer D, Cloud G, Wood EM, Mahady SE, Satterfield S, Grimm R, Murray AM; ASPREE Investigator Group. Effect of aspirin on cardiovascular events and bleeding in the healthy elderly. N Engl J Med 2018;379(16):1509-1518. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1805819.

Gaziano JM, Brotons C, Coppolecchia R, Crichelli C, Darius H, Gorelick PB, Howard G, Pearson TA, Rothwell PM, Ruilope LM, Tendera M, Tognoni G; ARRIVE Executive Committee. Use of aspirin to reduce risk of initial vascular events in patients at moderate risk of cardiovascular disease (ARRIVE): a randomized doubled-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lan- cet 2018;392(10152):1036-1046. doi:10. 1016/S0140-6736(18)31924-X.

ASCEND Study Collaborative Group, Bowman L, Mafham M, Wallendszus K, Stevens W, Buck G, Barton J, Murphy K, Aung T, Haynes R, Cox J, Murawska A, Young A, Lay M, Chen F, Sammons E, Wa- ters E, Adler A, Bodansky J, Farmer A, McPherson R, Neil A, Simpson D, Peto R, Baigent C, Collins R, Parish S, Armitage J. Effects of aspirin for primary prevention in persons with diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2018;379(16):1529-1539. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1804988.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 1036/bmj.n71.

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan D, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: ¿is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.

Barratt A, Wyer PC, Hatala R, McGinn T, Dans AL, Keitz S, Moyer V, For GG; Evidence-Based Medicine Teaching Tips Working Group. Tips for learners of evidence- based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, and, number needed to treat. CMAJ 2004;171(4):353-358.doi:10.1503/cmaj.1021197.

Altman DG. Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. BMJ 1998; 317(7168):1309-1312. doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1309.

Hull RD, Liang J, Bergqvist D, Yusen RD. Benefit-to-harm ratio of thromboprophylaxis for patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost 2014;111(2):199-212. doi:10.1160/TH13-08-0654.

Evidence Based Medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. Editors: Sharon Straus, Paul Glasziou, W. Scott Richardson, R. Brian Haynes (Spanish) 5th Edition Copyright: © Elsevier 2019, Published: April 7, 2019, eBook ISBN: 9788491135579, pp 360.

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;327:557-560.

Zhao B, Wu Q, Wang L, Liao C, Dong Y, Xu J, Wei Y, Zhang W. Pros and cons of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a secondary study of trial sequential analysis. Front Pharmacol 2021;11:592116. doi:10.3389/fphar. 2020.592116

Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy--I: Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. BMJ 1994;308(6921):81-106.

Berger JS, Lala A, Krantz MJ, Baker GS, Hiatt WR. Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients without clinical cardiovascular disease: a metaanalysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J2011;162(1):115-124. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2011.04.006.

Abdelaziz HK, Saad M, Pothineni NVK, Megaly M, Potluri R, Saleh M, Kon DLC, Roberts DH, Bhatt DL, Aronow HD, Abbott JD, Mehta JL. Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73 (23): 2915-2929. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.501.

Puhan MA, Singh S, Weiss CO, Varadhan R, Sharma R, Boyd CM. Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Comparison of Quantitative Approaches. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); November 2013. Nov. Report No.: 12(14)-EHC149-EF.

US Preventive Services Task Force. Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;150(6):396-404. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-6-200903170-00008.

US Preventive Services Task Force. Seeks Comments on Draft Recommendation Statement on Aspirin to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer, September 15, 2015. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org.

US Preventive Services Task Force. Publishes Final Recommendation Statement on Aspirin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer. April 12, 2016.www.uspreventive- servicestaskforce.org.

Barbarawi M, Kheiri B, Zayed Y, Gakhal I, Al-Abdouh A, Barbarawi O, Rashdan L, Rizk F, Bachuwa G, Alkotob ML. Aspirin efficacy in primary prevention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2019;26(4):283-291. doi:10.1007/s40292-019-00325-5

Pallikadavath S, Ashton L, Brunskill NJ, Burton JO, Gray LJ, Major RW. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in individuals with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2022;28(17):1953-1960. doi:10.1093/eur-jpc/zwab132.

Rawal A, Cave B, Ardeshna D, Hana D, Ibebuogu UN, Khouzam RN. The death of aspirin for primary prevention ¿should aspirin be changed to a prescription only medication? Ann Transl Med 2019;7(17):402. doi:10.21037/atm.2019.07.05.

Elwood PC, Morgan G, Galante J, Chia JW, Dolwani S, Graziano JM, Kelson M, Lanas A, Longley M, Phillips CJ, Pickering J, Roberts SE, Soon SS, Steward W, Morris D, Weightman AL. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials to ascertain fatal gastrointestinal bleeding events attributable to preventive low-dose aspirin: no evidence of increased risk. PLoS One 2016;11(11):e0166166.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166166.

ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guideline. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation;140(11):e596-e646. https:// doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678.

Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Back M, Benetos A, Biffi A, Boavida JM, Capodanno D, Cosyns B, Crawford C, Davos CH, Desormais I, Angelantonio ED, Franco OH, Halvorsen S, Richard Hobbs FD, Hollander M, Jankowska EA, Michal M, Sacco S, Sattar N, Tokgozoglu L, Tonstad S, Tsioufis KP, van Dis I, van Gelder IC, Wanner C, Williams B; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Developed by the Task Force for cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies. With the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). Eur J Prev Cardiol 2022; 29, 5-115. doi:10.1093/eur- jpc/zwab154.

Marquis-Gravel G, Roe MT, Harrington RA, Muñoz D, Hernandez AF, Jones WS. Revisiting the role of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2019;140(13):1115-1124. doi:10.1161/CIRCUL ATIONAHA.119. 040205.

Seidu S, Kunutsor SK, Sesso HD, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Roncaglioni MC, Khunti K. Aspirin has potential benefits for primary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes: updated literature-based and individual participant data meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2019;18(1):70. doi:10.1186/s12933-019-0875-4.

McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Using numerical results from systematic reviews in clinical practice. Ann Intern Med 1997;126(9):712-720. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-126-9-199705010-00007.

Suissa S. The Number Needed to Treat: 25 Years of Trials and Tribulations in Clinical Research. Rambam Maimonides Med J 2015;6(3):e0033. Published 2015 Jul 30. doi:10.5041/RMMJ.10218.

Vizcaíno G, Montalvo Herdoiza JP, Siteneski A, Tauriz Navarro W. Secondary prevention in minor ischemic stroke with antiplatelet treatment. systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies with aspirin under non-inferiority criteria. Invest Clin 2020;61(3):265-282. https:// doi.org/10.22209/IC.v61n3a06.
Publicado
2023-08-25
Cómo citar
Vizcaino, G., & Weir Medina, J. (2023). Aspirin in primary cardiovascular prevention: the two faces of the coin and the importance of the Number Needed to Treat: a systematic review and meta- analysis.: Aspirina en prevención cardiovascular primaria. Las dos caras de la moneda y la importancia del número necesario a tratar. Revisión sistemática y metanálisis. Investigación Clínica, 64(3), 405-423. https://doi.org/10.54817/IC.v64n3a11