Analysis of the Fundamentals of Ukraine's Information Security Policy: Modern Imperatives of Sustainable State Development

• Oleksandr Nazarchuk Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-6020
• Tetiana Nikolaieva Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6772-5928
• Oksana Zaporozhets Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0784-9253
• Nataliia Bielousova Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-2942
• Olha Andrieieva Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4587-1267

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11205784

Keywords: information security, policy, Russian-Ukrainian war, Ukraine, European practice, soft power

Abstract

The aim of the article is to research the foundations of Ukraine's information security policy based on a study of the relevant modern imperatives of sustainable development of the state and existing international practices. To achieve this goal, theoretical methods of scientific research are used. Results: the authors examine the existing practices of information security in the leading European countries that determine the current European policy, including in relation to Ukraine in times of war (the Republic of Poland, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic). The main focus is on the introduction of a clear regulatory framework and the establishment of cooperation with civil society institutions. In order to form a high-quality system of Ukrainian information security, it is also proposed to introduce a reasonable balance between the existing constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens when using information resources, support the relevant legislative framework, emphasize the Ukrainian-centered cultural and information product, and develop mechanisms for effective interaction with civil organizations and institutions. The conclusions also highlight the need to improve information and digital culture among Ukrainians, which will be the key to overcoming some of the challenges associated with the spread of propaganda or cybercrime.

References

Andersson, A., Hedström, K., & Karlsson, F. (2022). Standardizing information security – a structurational analysis”. Information & Management, 59(3), 103623. doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103623

Cherniaieva, O., Orlenko, O., & Ashcheulova, O. (2023). The infrastructure of the Internet services market of the future: analysis of formation problems. Futurity Economics&Law, 3(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.03.25.01

Davis, A. (2009). New media and fat democracy: the paradox of online participation1. New Media & Society, 12(5), 745–761. doi:10.1177/1461444809341435

Davis, A., Freedman, D., Fenton, N., & Khiabany, G. (2020). Media, Democracy and Social Change: Re-Imagining Political Communications. SAGE Publications. https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/28251/

Devanny, J., Martin, C., & Stevens, T. (2021). On the strategic consequences of digitalespionage. Journal of Cyber Policy, 6(3), 429–450. doi:10.1080/23738871.2021.2000628

Gushchyn, O., Kotliarenko, O., Panchenko, I., Rezvorovych, K. (2022). Cyberlaw in Ukraine: current status and future development. Futurity Economics&Law, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2022.03.25.01

Hrynchyshyn, Y. (2021). The infrastructure of the Internet services market of the future: analysis of the problems of formation. Futurity Economics&Law, 1(2), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.06.25.2

Johnson, R. (2022). Dysfunctional Warfare: The Russian Invasion of Ukraine. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 52(2), 5–20. doi:10.55540/0031-
1723.3149

Kaplina, O. (2022). Prisoner of war: Special status in the criminal proceedings of ukraine and the right to exchange. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 5(4-2), 8–24. doi:10.33327/ajee-18-5.4-a000438

Kunath, M., & Winkler, H. (2019). Usability of information systems to support decision making in the order management process. Procedia CIRP, 81, 322–327. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.056

Lam, W. M. W., & Lyons, B. (2020). Does data protection legislation increase the quality of internet services? Economics Letters, 195, 109463. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109463

Manolea, A. (2021). The Transpersonal War – Constituent of the Hybrid War. Land Forces Academy Review, 26(4), 372–376. doi:10.2478/raft-2021-0048

Matvіienkіv, S., & Shmalenko, I. (2022). Mass media of national minorities as a means of national reconciliation in society. Studia Europaea Gnesnensia, 24(24), 29–48. doi:10.14746/seg.2022.24.2

Nikolenko, K. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Society: Pros and Cons of the Present, Future Prospects. Futurity Philosophy, 1(2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.06.30.05

Paleri, P. (2022). Informational Security (Infosec). У Revisiting National Security (с. 705–740). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-8293-3_17

Park, C. S. (2019). The mediating role of political talk and political efficacy in the effects of news use on expressive and collective participation. Communication and the Public, 4(1), 35–52. doi:10.1177/2057047319829580

Piumatti, G., Magistro, D., Zecca, M., & Esliger, D. W. (2017). The mediation effect of political interest on the connection between social trust and wellbeing among older adults. Ageing and Society, 38(11), 2376–2395. doi:10.1017/s0144686x1700071x

Sofilkanych, M. (2022). The formation of a new information culture of the future: thesocio-philosophical content. Futurity Philosophy, 1(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.03.30.05

Taherdoost, H. (2022). Cybersecurity vs. Information Security. Procedia Computer Science, 215, 483–487. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.050

Tejay, G. P. S., & Mohammed, Z. A. (2022). Cultivating Security Culture for Information Security Success: A Mixed-Methods Study Based on Anthropological Perspective. Information & Management, 103751. doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103751

van Daalen, O. (2022). In defense of offense: information security research under the right to science. Computer Law & Security Review, 46, 105706. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105706

Yarmoliuk, O. (2022). Information support of enterprises: problems, challenges, prospects. Futurity Economics & Law, 2(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2022.03.25.02