Interpretation of meanings of the world view by representatives of different cultures from the standpoint of psycholinguistics

Keywords: the worldview, semantic layer, invariant of the worldview, system of social meanings, the world picture

Abstract

The objective of our study is to identify specific and significant for the society fragments of the cultural and semantic layer of the world view among representatives of Ukrainian and German cultures and to interpret them from the standpoint of psycholinguistics. The following methods were used in the study: a descriptive method was used to describe the semantic layer, the world pictures, reflected in the cultures of ancient peoples and their modern followers; abstract-logical method and its methods was applied for the synthesis of theoretical material; etymological analysis was used to reveal the original meaning of culturally defined concepts; continuous sampling method was used to establish quantitative characteristics of fragments of ancient invariants of the world view; associative experiment was applied to identify fragments of systems of object and verbal meanings that are significant for modern society. An associative experiment with German and Ukrainian schoolchildren showed that Ukrainian pupils have more social meanings in the important for modern society spheres than German pupils as representatives of their societies. At the same time, Ukrainian pupils highlighted society's appealing to problems which should be solved within the society itself.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akimenko, N. K., Kononov, N. V., Smirnova, Y. K. (2018). The influence of professional deformation on changing the worldview of teachers. Bulletin of Psychology and Pedagogy of Altai State University. No. 3. Pp. 7-10.

Artemyeva, E. Yu. (1999). Fundamentals of psychology of subjective semantics. M.: Smysl. 350 p.

Belousova, A. K., Tushnova, Yu. A. (2011). The world view: ethnopsychological aspect. Educational Psychology in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference / Volgograd State Pedagogical University. Volgograd: Peremena, Pp. 267-269.

Bohutskyi, V. M. Linguistic models of space as a cultural and national phenomenon (based on material of Ukrainian, English and Spanish). Access Mode: Philology.knu.ua/library/ragal/Studia-Linguistica-6-2-/013-022.pdf.

Caesar Julii. Commentari de Bello Gallico. Access mode: www.hist.msu.ru

Chernyshova, E. B. (2014). The concept of the world view in the theoretical apparatus of Russian psycholinguistics. Philological sciences. issues of theory and practice. No. 1. Part 3. Pp. 206-209.

Frumkina, R. M. (2003). Psycholinguistics. Textbook for students of higher educational institutions. M.: Akademia. 320 p.

Gachev, G. D. (2015). Cosmo-Psycho-Logos. National views of the world. M.: Academic project, 511 p.

Klochko, V. E., Galazhinskiy, E.V. (2009). Psychology of innovative behaviour. Tomsk: Tomsk state university, 240 p.

Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2006). Worldviews, families and grand theories: strategies for unification in psychology. The General Psychologist, No 41 (1), pp. 11 - 14.

Kononenko V.I. (1999). Symbols of the Ukrainian language. Ivano-Frankivsk, 270 p.

Kurganova, N. I. (2009). Ordinary knowledge as an object of ethno- psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Issue 4. P. 157-164.

Kurganova, N. I. (2010). The world view from the standpoint of ethno- psycholinguistics. Bulletin of A. S. Pushkin Leningrad State University. Series "Philology". No. 1. V.5. P. 64-74.

Leontiev, A. A. (1993). Linguistic consciousness and the world view. Language and consciousness: paradoxical reality. M.: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. P. 16-21.

Leontiev, A. A. (1997). Fundamentals of psycholinguistics. M.: Smysl. 287 p.

Leontiev, A. A. (1999). The psychology of meaning. M.: Nauka. 488 p.

Leontiev, A. N. (1979). The psychology of the image. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series: Psychology. No. 2. P. 3-13.

Leontiev, A. N. (1983). The world views. Selected psychological works. M.: Pedagogy. P. 251-261.

Leontiev, A. N. (1986). To the psychology of image. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series: Psychology. No. 3. P. 72-76.

Levitskyi, V. V. (2008). Fundamentals of German Studies. Vinnytsia: Nova Knyha. 528 p.

Levitsky, V. V. (2010). The etymological dictionary of Germanic languages: in 2 volumes. Vinnitsa: Nova Kniga. Vol. 1. 614 p.

Lyukshina, D. S. (2019). Professional specifics of the world view among specialists of various professions: the views of Russian psychologists. The world of science. Pedagogy and psychology. No. 1. P. 75.

Nakhapetova, O. V. (2014). Nomenclatures for the designation of family relations in the speech interaction of Ukrainians. Mova. № 22. – P. 48-51.

Nibelungenlied: Vollständige Ausgabe Mittelhochdeutsch – Neuhochdeutsch. Ostfildern: Patmos, 2005. 856 s.

Obukhov, A. (2003). Historically conditioned modifications of the world view. Razvitie lichnosti. No. 4. P. 51-68.

Paulhus, D. L., Carey, I. M. (2011). The FAD-Plus: measuring lay beliefs regarding free will andrelate constructs. Journal of personality assessment, No 93, pp. 96–104.

Petrenko, V. F. (2005). The basics of psychosemantics. St. Petersburg: Peter. 480 p.

Petukhov, V. V. (1984). The world view and the psychological study of thinking. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14: Psychology. No. 4. P. 13-20.

Rousseau, D., Billingham, Ju. (2018). A systematic framework for exploring worldviews and its generalizaton as a multi-purpose in quiry framework. Systems, No 6 (3), pp. 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems6030027.

Rozen, E. V. (1991). German vocabulary: history and modernity. Study quide. M.: Vysshaya shkolal. 96 p.

Serkin, V. P. (2017). Psychosemantics: a textbook and work book for Bachelor and Master programmes. M.: Yurayt. 318 p.

Sharapa, I. S. (2008). Formation of the world view in the mind of man. Access mode: http://intkonf.org

Sharmanova, N. M. (2015). Ethnolinguistics. Textbook for students of the faculty of Ukrainian philology. Kryvyi Rih: NPP Asteriks. 192 p.

Shuleva, E. I. (2018). The relationship of the world view and the individual psychological characteristics of adolescents. Humanitarian and pedagogical research. No. 1. V. 2. P. 62-66.

Smirnov, S. D. (1981). The world of images and the world view. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14: Psychology. No. 2. P. 15-29.

Spiridonova, L. K. (2015). Associative experiment as a means of studying the world view. Nauka i osvita. No. 1. P. 152-158.

Stetsenko, A. (2016). Moving beyond the relational worldview: exploring the next steps premised on agency and a commitment to social change. Human Development, No 59, pp. 283 – 289. https://doi.org/10.1159/000452720

Strelkov, Yu. K. (2000). Temporary connectedness of the world view. Psychology of subjective semantics in fundamental and applied research. M.: Publishing house of Moscow state university. P. 20-23.

Sturluson, S. Weltkreis. Vol. 2. Nabu Press, 2012. 358 s.

Tacitus Publius Cornelius. De origine et situ Germanorum. Access mode: www.hist.msu.ru

Tarasov, E. F. (2008). The world views. Issues of psycholinguistics. No. 8. p. 6- 9.

Terentiy, L. M. (2018). Psychological study of the world view. Psychological sciences. Issues of theory and practice. No. 2 (80). Part 1. P. 170-173.

Tkach, M. (2008). Mythology. Course of lectures. K., 2008. - 280 p.

Ukrainian sky. Studies on the history of astronomy in Ukraine. Collection of scientific papers. Lviv: Institute of Applied Problems of Mechanics and Mathematics named after Pidstryhach, NAS of Ukraine, 2014. 767 p. Access Mode: https://books.google.com/books?isbn=966027386X

Zhayvoronok, V. V. (2007). Ukrainian Ethnolinguistics: Essays. K.: Dovira, 264 p.

Zinchenko, V. P. (1983). From the genesis of sensations to the world view. A. N. Leontiev and modern psychology. M: Publishing house of Moscow State University, P. 141-149.
Published
2024-05-09
How to Cite
Khomenko, T., Tokaryeva, T., Habelko, O., Foka, M., & Taranukha, T. (2024). Interpretation of meanings of the world view by representatives of different cultures from the standpoint of psycholinguistics. Interacción Y Perspectiva, 14(3), 839-854. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11205730