Digital democracy and artificial intelligence governance: Social issues

Keywords: digital democracy, government, artificial intelligence, social problems, social theory, citizen participation, technology

Abstract

The digitalization of democracy means that more people have the opportunity to interact with the institutions and organs of public power by means of information and communication technologies in a process that, apparently, facilitates the exercise of citizenship and the enjoyment of civil liberties. In this context, it is not unusual to think that artificial intelligence will be actively integrated into the decision- making apparatus of contemporary democracies. Therefore, the aim of the research is to describe the social problems of digital democracy and the use of AI in government. The research made use of the philosophical method of the maieutic type and the documentary research technique, with the collection of sources of a scientific nature. It is concluded that there are three possibilities concerning digital democracy and AI: first, a constructive scenario where these technologies mean progress for democracy in the world; second, a scenario of moderate optimism, which identifies the positive and negative aspects of these experiences; and third, a critical scenario, which sees the integration of AI into the political life of society as negative for democracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, M., & Hocquard, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence, democracy and elections. Brussels: European Parliament.

Benedikt, A., Mirbabaie, M., Lembcke, T.-B., & Hofeditz, L. (2021). Ethical Management of Artificial Intelligence. Sustainability, 13 (04), 01-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041974.

Bobbio, N. (1985). Estado, gobierno y sociedad. Por una teoría general de la política. Ciudad de México: Fondo de cultura económica.

CEPAL. (2021). Tecnologías digitales para un nuevo futuro. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.

Dahl, R. (1992). La democracia y sus críticos. Barcelona: Paidós.

Ford, E. (2015). Los alcances de la democracia digital. Lima: XX Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública.

Ford, E. (2019). El reto de la democracia digital. hacia una ciudadanía interconectada. Lima: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.

Galaski, J. (08 de septiembre de 2021). Regulación de la IA: Situación actual y posibilidades futuras. Obtenido de Liberties: https://www.liberties.eu/es/stories/regulacion-ia/43740

Giovanni, S. (2009). La democracia en 30 lecciones. Bogotá: Taurus.

Lokshin, M., & Umapathi, N. (23 de enero de 2022). Brookings. Obtenido de Al for social protection: Mind the people: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ai-for-social-protection-mind-the-people/

Mena, C. (2021). Democracia digital características y desafíos. Revista derecho electoral, (31), 171-181.

News european parliamnet. (12 de diciembre de 2023). EU AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligence. Obtenido de Society: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20230601STO9380 4/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence

Nussbaum, M. (2012). Crear capacidades Propuesta para el desarrollo humano. Barcelona: Paidós.

OECDilribary. (16 de noviembre de 2023). Uso estratégico y responsable de la inteligencia artificial en el sector público de América Latina y el Caribe. Obtenido de Casos prácticos de uso de la IA en los Gobiernos de América Latina y el Caribe: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/6150ef8b-es/index.html?itemId=/content/component/6150ef8b-es

Ospina, M., & Zambrano, K. (2023). Gobierno digital e inteligencia artificial, una mirada al caso colombiano. Administración y desarrollo, 53 (01), 01-34.

Panditharatne, M., & Giansiracusa, N. (13 de june de 2023). How AI Puts Elections at Risk — And the Needed Safeguards. Obtenido de Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/how-ai-puts-elections-risk-and-needed-safeguards

Parlamericas. (2022). Declaración el futuro de la democracia en la era digital. Santiago de Chile: 7º Encuentro de la Red de Parlamento Abierto de ParlAmericas.

Sartori, G. (1988). Teoría de la democracia. Tomo II. Los problemas clásicos. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.

UNESCO. (5 de enero de 2024). Global Forum on the Ethics of AI 2024. Obtenido de Artificial Intelligence: https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics

Vesteinsson, K. (17 de enero de 2024). The Democratic Stakes of Artificial Intelligence Regulation. Obtenido de Freedom Hause: https://freedomhouse.org/article/democratic-stakes-artificial-intelligence-regulation

Werthner, H., Prem, E., Lee, E. A., & Ghezzi, C. (2022). Perspectives on Digital Humanism. Berkeley: Springer.
Published
2024-04-03
How to Cite
Fabrika, A., Kostyshyna, T., Kliuienko, E., Mats , T., & Kharchenko, L. (2024). Digital democracy and artificial intelligence governance: Social issues. Interacción Y Perspectiva, 14(2), 228-340. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10909505