Productivity In Higher Education Institutions Within Digitalization

  • Olga Kravchenko Universidad Federal de Kazán, Rusia
  • Olga E. Vinokurova Vinokurova Universidad Federal del Noreste de M.K
  • Vitaly M. Smolentsev Universidad Agraria Estatal de Kuban de I.T.
  • Rafina R. Zakieva Universidad Estatal de Ingeniería Eléctrica de Kazán, Rusia
Keywords: digitalization, teacher's work, labor intensity, efficiency, process

Abstract

This study is aimed at determining the teachers’ productivity in the context of digitalization of education and the implementation of digital technologies in the process of higher educational institutions work. The author underlines several factors that affect the teachers’ productivity: organizational and economic, material and technical factors, scientific and innovative, social factors. The sample size of this study is 91 teachers, associate professors, assistants, young teachers, and professors included. The obtained results show that the process of digitalization of education provides teachers with the opportunity to increase labor productivity by more than 47%, since innovative technologies save time for preparing for classes and reduce labor intensity. But the presence of computer illiteracy among some employees reduces labor productivity by 10%, and labor intensity increases by 30%, therefore, improving computer literacy and refresher courses take up most of the teachers' time that they could spend on work. It is concluded that the development of digitalization in education in general has a positive effect on the efficiency of teachers' work, but it also has negative aspects, therefore, some recommendations were given by the author in order to improve this process

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Olga Kravchenko, Universidad Federal de Kazán, Rusia

Department of Legal Disciplines, Kazan Federal University, Russia

Olga E. Vinokurova Vinokurova, Universidad Federal del Noreste de M.K

North-Eastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosov,Yakutsk, Russia, Department of Theories and Principles of Physical Education and Life Safety, Institute of Physical Culture and Sport

Vitaly M. Smolentsev, Universidad Agraria Estatal de Kuban de I.T.

Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, Krasnodar, Russian Federation, Department of Higher Mathematics

Rafina R. Zakieva, Universidad Estatal de Ingeniería Eléctrica de Kazán, Rusia

Kazan State Power Engineering University, Kazan, Russia, Department of Industrial electronics and lighting engineering

References

• Arzumanova, N.V. (2009). “The use of modern information technologies in the educational process”. Bulletin of the Russian State Pedagogical University. AI Herzen, (113).
• Panyushkina, O.A. (2013). Some features of teaching a foreign language using information technology in modern conditions. Teaching and education: methods and practice, (7).
• Nomass, B. B. (2013). “The impact of using technology in teaching English as a second language”. English language and literature studies, 3 (1), 111.
• Zhang, J. X., Liu, L., de Pablos, P. O., & She, J. (2014). “The auxiliary role of information technology in teaching: Enhancing programming course using Alice”. The International journal of engineering education, 30 (3), 560-565.
• Costley, K. C. (2014). The Positive Effects of Technology on Teaching and Student Learning. Online submission.
• Muttappallymyalil, J., Mendis, S., John, L. J., Shanthakumari, N., Sreedharan, J., & Shaikh, R. B. (2016). “Evolution of technology in teaching: blackboard and beyond in medical education”. Nepal journal of epidemiology, 6 (3), 588.
• Ezziane, Z. (2007). “Information technology literacy: Implications on teaching and learning”. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (3), 175-191.
• Li, N. (2013). “Seeking best practices and meeting the needs of the English language learners: Using second language theories and integrating technology in teaching”. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 9 (3), 217-222.
• Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). “Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools". International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1 (2), 175-191.
• Shadrikov, V.D., & Shemet, I.S. (2009). Information technology in education: pros and cons. Higher education in Russia, (11).
• Klyuev, M.A. (2008). PROBLEMS OF "INFORMATIZATION" OF THE MODERN SCHOOL. In Ways to Improve the Modern Education System (pp. 109-111).
• Trukhanenko, M.K. (2020). Pros and cons of distance learning (from the practice of teaching the russian language). In IX All-Russian Science Festival (pp. 13-16).
• Kemp, A. T., Preston, J., Page, C. S., Harper, R., Dillard, B., Flynn, J., & Yamaguchi, M. (2014). “Technology and teaching: A conversation among faculty regarding the pros and cons of technology”. Qualitative Report, 19, 6.
• Yunus, M. M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H., Sun, C. H., & Embi, M. A. (2013). “Pros and Cons of Using IICT in Teaching ESL Reading and Writing”. International education studies, 6 (7), 119-130.
• Pazilah, F. N. P., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). “Using Technology in ESL Classroom: Highlights and Challenges”. Creative Education, 10 (12), 3205.
• Srivastava, P. (2019). “Advantages & disadvantages of e-education & e-learning”. Journal of Retail Marketing & Distribution Management, 2 (3), 22-27.
• Wasserman, E., & Migdal, R. (2019). “Professional Development: Teachers' Attitudes in Online and Traditional Training Courses”. Online Learning, 23 (1), 132-143.
• Rachek, S.V., & Miroshnik, A.V. (2013). “Labor productivity as the main indicator of labor efficiency”. Modern problems of science and education, (6), 503-503.
• Weisburd, V.A. (2015). “Organization of remuneration is an important element of personnel policy and strategy”. Bulletin of Samara State Economic University, (6), 95-100.
• Bolotov, V.A. (2005). On the construction of an all-Russian system for assessing the quality of education. Educational issues, (1).
• Boguslavskaya, T.N. (2012). Formation of approaches to assessing the quality of preschool education. Problems of modern education, (4).
• Litvinova, O. I., & Cherkasov, V. E. (2012). Efficiency of teaching staff as a factor in the growth of the competitiveness of the university. Creative Economy, (8).
• Pashtaev, B.D., Kulibekov, N.A., & Kelbikhanov, R.K. (2017). Requirements for a teacher in the context of the leading trends in the development of the domestic higher education system. The world of science, culture, education, (2 (63)).
• Ustinova, O. N., Volkova, L. M., Dasko, M. A., Golubev, A. A., Datsenko, A. A., & Vasiliev, D. A. (2021). Digitalization of education in modern conditions. Scientific notes of the University. PF Lesgaft, (3), 433-436.
• Shadrikov, V.D., & Kuznetsova, I.V. (2010). Methodology for assessing the level of qualifications of teaching staff. VD Shadrikov, IV Kuznetsova.
• Isaeva, T.E. (2013) Competence of subjects of university education. Problems of the formation and assessment of competencies in the educational information space: Monograph / T.E. Isaeva // Palmarium Academic Publishing, Deutschland. [Text]. - 247 p. 7
Published
2021-12-20
How to Cite
Kravchenko, O., Vinokurova, O. E. V., Smolentsev, V. M., & Zakieva, R. R. (2021). Productivity In Higher Education Institutions Within Digitalization. Interacción Y Perspectiva, 11(2), 154-169. Retrieved from https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/interaccion/article/view/37465