Productivity In Higher Education Institutions Within Digitalization
Abstract
This study is aimed at determining the teachers’ productivity in the context of digitalization of education and the implementation of digital technologies in the process of higher educational institutions work. The author underlines several factors that affect the teachers’ productivity: organizational and economic, material and technical factors, scientific and innovative, social factors. The sample size of this study is 91 teachers, associate professors, assistants, young teachers, and professors included. The obtained results show that the process of digitalization of education provides teachers with the opportunity to increase labor productivity by more than 47%, since innovative technologies save time for preparing for classes and reduce labor intensity. But the presence of computer illiteracy among some employees reduces labor productivity by 10%, and labor intensity increases by 30%, therefore, improving computer literacy and refresher courses take up most of the teachers' time that they could spend on work. It is concluded that the development of digitalization in education in general has a positive effect on the efficiency of teachers' work, but it also has negative aspects, therefore, some recommendations were given by the author in order to improve this process
Downloads
References
• Panyushkina, O.A. (2013). Some features of teaching a foreign language using information technology in modern conditions. Teaching and education: methods and practice, (7).
• Nomass, B. B. (2013). “The impact of using technology in teaching English as a second language”. English language and literature studies, 3 (1), 111.
• Zhang, J. X., Liu, L., de Pablos, P. O., & She, J. (2014). “The auxiliary role of information technology in teaching: Enhancing programming course using Alice”. The International journal of engineering education, 30 (3), 560-565.
• Costley, K. C. (2014). The Positive Effects of Technology on Teaching and Student Learning. Online submission.
• Muttappallymyalil, J., Mendis, S., John, L. J., Shanthakumari, N., Sreedharan, J., & Shaikh, R. B. (2016). “Evolution of technology in teaching: blackboard and beyond in medical education”. Nepal journal of epidemiology, 6 (3), 588.
• Ezziane, Z. (2007). “Information technology literacy: Implications on teaching and learning”. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (3), 175-191.
• Li, N. (2013). “Seeking best practices and meeting the needs of the English language learners: Using second language theories and integrating technology in teaching”. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 9 (3), 217-222.
• Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). “Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools". International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1 (2), 175-191.
• Shadrikov, V.D., & Shemet, I.S. (2009). Information technology in education: pros and cons. Higher education in Russia, (11).
• Klyuev, M.A. (2008). PROBLEMS OF "INFORMATIZATION" OF THE MODERN SCHOOL. In Ways to Improve the Modern Education System (pp. 109-111).
• Trukhanenko, M.K. (2020). Pros and cons of distance learning (from the practice of teaching the russian language). In IX All-Russian Science Festival (pp. 13-16).
• Kemp, A. T., Preston, J., Page, C. S., Harper, R., Dillard, B., Flynn, J., & Yamaguchi, M. (2014). “Technology and teaching: A conversation among faculty regarding the pros and cons of technology”. Qualitative Report, 19, 6.
• Yunus, M. M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H., Sun, C. H., & Embi, M. A. (2013). “Pros and Cons of Using IICT in Teaching ESL Reading and Writing”. International education studies, 6 (7), 119-130.
• Pazilah, F. N. P., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). “Using Technology in ESL Classroom: Highlights and Challenges”. Creative Education, 10 (12), 3205.
• Srivastava, P. (2019). “Advantages & disadvantages of e-education & e-learning”. Journal of Retail Marketing & Distribution Management, 2 (3), 22-27.
• Wasserman, E., & Migdal, R. (2019). “Professional Development: Teachers' Attitudes in Online and Traditional Training Courses”. Online Learning, 23 (1), 132-143.
• Rachek, S.V., & Miroshnik, A.V. (2013). “Labor productivity as the main indicator of labor efficiency”. Modern problems of science and education, (6), 503-503.
• Weisburd, V.A. (2015). “Organization of remuneration is an important element of personnel policy and strategy”. Bulletin of Samara State Economic University, (6), 95-100.
• Bolotov, V.A. (2005). On the construction of an all-Russian system for assessing the quality of education. Educational issues, (1).
• Boguslavskaya, T.N. (2012). Formation of approaches to assessing the quality of preschool education. Problems of modern education, (4).
• Litvinova, O. I., & Cherkasov, V. E. (2012). Efficiency of teaching staff as a factor in the growth of the competitiveness of the university. Creative Economy, (8).
• Pashtaev, B.D., Kulibekov, N.A., & Kelbikhanov, R.K. (2017). Requirements for a teacher in the context of the leading trends in the development of the domestic higher education system. The world of science, culture, education, (2 (63)).
• Ustinova, O. N., Volkova, L. M., Dasko, M. A., Golubev, A. A., Datsenko, A. A., & Vasiliev, D. A. (2021). Digitalization of education in modern conditions. Scientific notes of the University. PF Lesgaft, (3), 433-436.
• Shadrikov, V.D., & Kuznetsova, I.V. (2010). Methodology for assessing the level of qualifications of teaching staff. VD Shadrikov, IV Kuznetsova.
• Isaeva, T.E. (2013) Competence of subjects of university education. Problems of the formation and assessment of competencies in the educational information space: Monograph / T.E. Isaeva // Palmarium Academic Publishing, Deutschland. [Text]. - 247 p. 7