Modelling as the key instrument of the systematic-structural approach to the psychology of personality
Abstract
The paper studies the problems of modelling the personality in the traditions of the systematic-structural approach. It mainly focuses attention on the research of the structure of personality in the context of a systematic approach through a structural analysis. The article presents the model of human beings of different historical periods and traditions and shows their roles in defining the structure of personality. The analysis indicates that the study of the human psychology from the prism of a single model is impossible. Given the complexity of the psychic setup and preponderance of different approaches, the selection of each model requires the establishment of necessary criteria. It is deemed that the understanding of the psyche can be realized only through the analysis of the manifestations of the objective or subjective reality in correlation to each other. It has been found that a one-sided approach to the model cannot yield serious outcomes in the understanding and diagnosis of the human psyche. The model solves the issue of reconstructing the intellectual potential of the human being, who is carrying out some function merging the ideal essence of the psyche with its physical manifestations. As a phenomenon, modelling does not reflect the content of the psyche, but allows to define the set of manifestations in different aspects of the human interaction with the objective and subjective reality.
Downloads
References
• Ananiev B.G . Man as a subject of knowledge. SPb .: Peter, 2001.288 p.
• Afanasyev V.G. On integral systems // Questions of Philosophy. –1980. –No6. –S.62-78.
• Brudny, A. A. Understanding as a philosophical and psychological problem / A. A. Brudny // Problems of Philosophy. - 1975. - No. 10. - P. 11.
• Dilts R. Coaching with the help of NLP. - SPb .: PRIME-EVROZNAK, 2004 .-- 256 p. (Project "The Magic of Higher Practical Psychology"). ISBN 5-93878-138-8, p. 26.
• Klaus G. Cybernetics and Philosophy: trans. with him. Moscow: Foreign Literature, 1963.
• Kondakov I.M. Psychology. Illustrated Dictionary. // THEM. Kondakov. - 2nd ed. add. and revised - SPb., 2007, p. 346.
• Minchenkov A.V., Elpidiforov P.B. Structural psychosomatics methods. - SPb. : Publishing house "Juventa"; M .: Institute of General Humanitarian Research, 2001 - 409 p.
• Panferov V. N., Andronova M. S., Miklyaeva A. V. General psychology. Theoretical foundations: textbook and workshop for the academic bachelor's degree. M .: Yurayt, 2018.296 p.
• Panferov VN, Bezgodova SA Methodology of integral synthesis in psychological cognition of a person // From the origins to the present: 130 years of the organization of psychological society at Moscow University: collection of materials of the anniversary conference: in 5 volumes / otv. ed. D. B. Bogoyavlenskaya. M .: Kogito-Center, 2015.Vol. 1.P. 98-100.
• Panferov V. N. Klassifikatsiya psihologicheskih kachestv cheloveka i metodologiya issledovaniya haraktera // Prakticheskaya psihologiya. Metodologiya i metodiki nauchnyih issledovaniy. SPb.: Obrazovanie, 1996. S. 3–21.
• Panferov V. N., Bezgodova S. A., Vasilieva S. V., Guseva Yu. E.,
• Miklyaeva A. V. Structural model of mental organization in the context of an integrative approach to human psychology. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strukturnaya-model-psihicheskoy-organizatsii-v-kontekste-integrativnogo-podhoda-k-psihologii-cheloveka
• Rubinstein S. L. (1999) Fundamentals of General Psychology. - SPb. Peter.
• Ukhtomsky A.A. Dominant, "Science", M.-L., 1966, pp.16-27.
• Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. " - Chun Siong Soon, Marcel Brass, Hans-Jochen Heinze, John-Dylan Haynes - Nature Neuroscience, 11, 543-545 (2008) Published: 13 April 2008 https://www.nature.com/articles/nn.2112.
• Hall M., Bodenhamer B. / Complete course of NLP. - Moscow: AST, 2014. - 635, [5] p. - (Psychology. Higher course). ISBN 978-5-17-077349-7, p. 298.
• De Raad, B. (2009). Structural models of personality. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (p. 127–147). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596544.011
• Jahoda G. Foreword // Berry J. W., Poortinga Y. H., Segall M. H., Dasen P. R. Crosscultural psychol-ogy: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. P. X–XII.
• Yanchuk V. A. Sotsiokulturno-interdeterministskaya dialogicheskaya perspektiva pozitsionirovaniya v psihologicheskom mnogoobrazii // Psihologicheskoe znanie: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivyi razvitiya. M.: Institut psihologii RAN, 2018. S. 385–408.
• Miheeva E. N. Sotsialno-psihologicheskaya interpretatsiya lichnosti uchenika po vneshnosti i neverbal-nomu povedeniyu v situatsii uroka: avtoref. dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk. SPb., 1993. 17 s.
• Tarabrina N. V. Psihologiya posttravmaticheskogo stressa: integrativnyiy podhod: avtoref. dis. … d-ra psihol. nauk. SPb., 2008. 71 s.
