Análisis de los Fundamentos de la Política de Seguridad de la Información de Ucrania: Imperativos Modernos del Desarrollo Sostenible del Estado (Prácticas Internacionales)

Oleksandr  Nazarchuk; Tetiana  Nikolaieva; Oksana  Zaporozhets; Nataliia  Bielousova; Olha  Andrieieva

doi:10.5281/zenodo.11205784

Oleksandr Nazarchuk Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-6020
Tetiana Nikolaieva Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6772-5928
Oksana Zaporozhets Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0784-9253
Nataliia Bielousova Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-2942
Olha Andrieieva Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4587-1267

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11205784

Palabras clave: seguridad de la información, política, guerra ruso-ucraniana, Ucrania, práctica europea, poder blando

Resumen

El objetivo del artículo es analizar los fundamentos de la política de seguridad de la información de Ucrania a partir del estudio de los imperativos modernos pertinentes del desarrollo sostenible del Estado y de las prácticas internacionales existentes. Para lograr su objetivo se utilizan métodos teóricos de investigación científica. Autores también examinan las prácticas existentes en materia de seguridad de la información en los principales países europeos que determinan la política europea actual, incluso en relación con Ucrania en tiempos de guerra (la República de Polonia, la República Federal de Alemania y la República Francesa). Para formar un sistema de seguridad de la información ucraniano de alta calidad, también se propone introducir un equilibrio razonable entre los derechos constitucionales existentes y las libertades de los ciudadanos a la hora de utilizar los recursos de información, apoyar el marco legislativo pertinente, hacer hincapié en el producto cultural e informativo centrado en Ucrania y desarrollar mecanismos para una interacción eficaz con las organizaciones e instituciones públicas. Las conclusiones también destacan la necesidad de mejorar la cultura informativa y digital entre los ucranianos, lo que será clave para superar algunos de los retos asociados a la difusión de propaganda, la ciberdelincuencia.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Oleksandr Nazarchuk, Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Ph.D., in Historical Sciences, Doctoral Student of the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Philosophy, Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Tetiana Nikolaieva, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Ph.D., in Historical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Political Technologies, Institute of Law, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Oksana Zaporozhets, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Ph.D., in Political Sciences, Associate Professor of the Chair of International Information, Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Nataliia Bielousova, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Ph.D.; in Political Sciences, Docent, Associate Professor Department of International Information, Educational and scientific institute of international relations, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Olha Andrieieva, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Professor Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations, Chair of International Information, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Citas

Andersson, A., Hedström, K., & Karlsson, F. (2022). Standardizing information security – a structurational analysis”. Information & Management, 59(3), 103623. doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103623

Cherniaieva, O., Orlenko, O., & Ashcheulova, O. (2023). The infrastructure of the Internet services market of the future: analysis of formation problems. Futurity Economics&Law, 3(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.03.25.01

Davis, A. (2009). New media and fat democracy: the paradox of online participation1. New Media & Society, 12(5), 745–761. doi:10.1177/1461444809341435

Davis, A., Freedman, D., Fenton, N., & Khiabany, G. (2020). Media, Democracy and Social Change: Re-Imagining Political Communications. SAGE Publications. https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/28251/

Devanny, J., Martin, C., & Stevens, T. (2021). On the strategic consequences of digitalespionage. Journal of Cyber Policy, 6(3), 429–450. doi:10.1080/23738871.2021.2000628

Gushchyn, O., Kotliarenko, O., Panchenko, I., Rezvorovych, K. (2022). Cyberlaw in Ukraine: current status and future development. Futurity Economics&Law, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2022.03.25.01

Hrynchyshyn, Y. (2021). The infrastructure of the Internet services market of the future: analysis of the problems of formation. Futurity Economics&Law, 1(2), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.06.25.2

Johnson, R. (2022). Dysfunctional Warfare: The Russian Invasion of Ukraine. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 52(2), 5–20. doi:10.55540/0031-
1723.3149

Kaplina, O. (2022). Prisoner of war: Special status in the criminal proceedings of ukraine and the right to exchange. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 5(4-2), 8–24. doi:10.33327/ajee-18-5.4-a000438

Kunath, M., & Winkler, H. (2019). Usability of information systems to support decision making in the order management process. Procedia CIRP, 81, 322–327. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.056

Lam, W. M. W., & Lyons, B. (2020). Does data protection legislation increase the quality of internet services? Economics Letters, 195, 109463. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109463

Manolea, A. (2021). The Transpersonal War – Constituent of the Hybrid War. Land Forces Academy Review, 26(4), 372–376. doi:10.2478/raft-2021-0048

Matvіienkіv, S., & Shmalenko, I. (2022). Mass media of national minorities as a means of national reconciliation in society. Studia Europaea Gnesnensia, 24(24), 29–48. doi:10.14746/seg.2022.24.2

Nikolenko, K. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Society: Pros and Cons of the Present, Future Prospects. Futurity Philosophy, 1(2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.06.30.05

Paleri, P. (2022). Informational Security (Infosec). У Revisiting National Security (с. 705–740). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-8293-3_17

Park, C. S. (2019). The mediating role of political talk and political efficacy in the effects of news use on expressive and collective participation. Communication and the Public, 4(1), 35–52. doi:10.1177/2057047319829580

Piumatti, G., Magistro, D., Zecca, M., & Esliger, D. W. (2017). The mediation effect of political interest on the connection between social trust and wellbeing among older adults. Ageing and Society, 38(11), 2376–2395. doi:10.1017/s0144686x1700071x

Sofilkanych, M. (2022). The formation of a new information culture of the future: thesocio-philosophical content. Futurity Philosophy, 1(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.03.30.05

Taherdoost, H. (2022). Cybersecurity vs. Information Security. Procedia Computer Science, 215, 483–487. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.050

Tejay, G. P. S., & Mohammed, Z. A. (2022). Cultivating Security Culture for Information Security Success: A Mixed-Methods Study Based on Anthropological Perspective. Information & Management, 103751. doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103751

van Daalen, O. (2022). In defense of offense: information security research under the right to science. Computer Law & Security Review, 46, 105706. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105706

Yarmoliuk, O. (2022). Information support of enterprises: problems, challenges, prospects. Futurity Economics & Law, 2(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2022.03.25.02