Jurisprudence of the European court of human rights in the choice of precautionary measures in criminal proceedings: legal realities and perspectives

Svitlana Romantsova; Igor Zinkovskyy; Ruslan Komisarchuk; Olha Balatska; Lesia Strelbitska

Svitlana Romantsova Lviv State University of Internal Affairs
Igor Zinkovskyy National University "Odesa Law Academy"
Ruslan Komisarchuk National University "Odesa Law Academy",
Olha Balatska The National University of Ostroh Academy
Lesia Strelbitska National University of Ostroh Academy

Palabras clave: European Court of Human Rights, European jurisprudence, precautionary measures, criminal process, legal reality of Ukraine.

Resumen

The article deals with the problems of application of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the selection of precautionary measures in criminal cases in accordance with Ukrainian law. Since the procedural legislation of Ukraine is currently not perfect in the framework of the establishment and regulation of the application of precautionary measures, the decisions of the ECHR serve as an indispensable regulator of this issue. The objective of the work is to study the peculiarities of the application of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the selection of precautionary measures in criminal proceedings. The subject of the investigation is the jurisprudence of the ECHR in the context of the choice of precautionary measures in the criminal process. The research methodology included and combined the dialectical method, logical and legal method, analysis, synthesis. By way of conclusion, the study shows that the practice of the ECHR is mandatory to take into account not only the courts but also the investigators and prosecutors, who legally have the right to request the court to apply such precautionary measures.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Svitlana Romantsova, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs

Ph. D., Senior Lecturer, Department of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs

Igor Zinkovskyy, National University "Odesa Law Academy"

Ph.D. candidate, Department of criminal procedure, detective, and operational search activity of National University "Odesa Law Academy"

Ruslan Komisarchuk, National University "Odesa Law Academy",

Ph. D., Associate Professor of Criminology Department of National University "Odesa Law Academy"

Olha Balatska, The National University of Ostroh Academy

Ph. D., Senior Lecturer of Departments of civil-legal disciplines of I. Malynovskyi Institute of Law, The National University of Ostroh Academy

Lesia Strelbitska, National University of Ostroh Academy

Ph. D., Senior Lecturer of Departments of state-legal disciplines of National University of Ostroh Academy

Citas

ARKUSHA, Larysa; KORNIIENKO, Maksym; BERENDIEIEVA, Anastasiia. 2019. “Criminal activity in Ukraine in the light of current conditions” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, No. 24, pp. 386-391.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF UKRAINE. 2012. Verkhovna Rada de Ucrania. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text. Consultation date: 28/12/2019.

EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. 1950. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Available online. In: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf. Consultation date: 28/12/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1978. Judgment in the case of Klass and Others v. Germany Application. 6 September 1978, no. 5029/71. Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-57510. Consultation date: 28/12/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1990. Judgment in the case of Fox, Campbell, and Hartley v. The United Kingdom. 30 August 1990, Appl. No. 12244/86; 12245/86; 12383/86) Available online. In: https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECHR,3ae6b6f90.html. Consultation date: 28/12/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1991. Judgment in the case of Letellier v. France. 26 June 1991, (Application no. 12369/86). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/tur#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57678%22]}. Consultation date: 28/12/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1994. Judgment in the case of Murray v. The United Kingdom. 28 October 1994, (Application no. 14310/88). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57895%22]}. Consultation date: 28/12/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1996. Judgment in the case of Buckley v. The United Kingdom. 29 September 1996, (Application no. 20348/92). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58076%22]}. Consultation date: 24/06/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2000. Judgment in the case of Erdogdu v. Turkey. 15 June 2000, (Application no. 25723/94). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58607%22]}. Consultation date: 24/06/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2001. Judgment in Labita v. Italy. 6 April 2000, (Application no. 26772/95). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58559%22]}. Consultation date: 24/06/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2001. Judgment in the case of Chapman v. The United Kingdom. 18 January 2001, (Application no. 27238/95). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-59154%22]}. Consultation date: 24/06/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2001. Judgment in the case of Mancini v. Italy. 2 August 2001 , (Application no. 44955/98). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-59626%22]}. Consultation date: 24/06/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2002. Judgment in the case of Cola Est and others v. France. 16 April 2002, (Application no. 37971/97). Available online. In: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/5aefe0/pdf. Consultation date: 24/06/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2002. Judgment in the case of Kalashnikov v. Russia. 15.7.2002, (application no. 47095/99). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press#{%22itemid%22:[%22003-587422-591161%22]} Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2008. Judgment in the case of Yeloyev v. Ukraine. 6 November 2008, (Application no. 17283/02). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-89452%22]}. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2009. Judgment in the case of Mironenko and Martenko v. Ukraine. 15 September 2011, (Application no. 24652/04). Available online. In: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-106169&filename=001-106169.pdf&TID=ihgdqbxnfi. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2010. Judgment in the case of Bock v. Germany. 19 January 2010, Application no. (22051/07). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-97268%22]}. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2010. Judgment in the case of Mangouras v. Spain. 28 September 2010, (Application no. 12050/04). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-100686%22]}. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2011. Judgment in the case of Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine. 21 de abril de 2011, (Solicitud № 42310/04 ). Available online. In: https://www.legalaidreform.org/european-court-of-human-rights/item/219-ecthr-case-summary-nechiporuk-and-yonkalo-v-ukraine-21/04/2011/. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2012. Judgment in the case of Herrmann v. Germany. 26 June 2012, (Application no. 9300/07). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-111690%22]}. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2013. Judgment in the case of Winterstein and others v. France. 17 October 2013, (Application no. 27013/07). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-127539%22]}. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2014. Judgment in the case of Buzadji v. The Republic of Moldova. 16 December 2014, (Application no. 23755/07). ). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-148659%22]}. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2014. Judgment in the case of Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan. 22 May 2014, (Application no. 15172/13). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-144124. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2018. Judgment in the case of Yordanov et al. v. Bulgaria. 6 September 2018, (application no. 3401/09). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=003-6180017-8012606&filename=Judgments%20and%20decisions%20of%2006.09.18.pdf. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2019. Judgment in the case of A.A. v. Switzerland. 7 January 2014, (Application no. 58802/12). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-139903%22]}. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2019. Judgment in the case of Korban v. Ukraine. 4 July 2019, (no. 26744/16). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-194188%22]}. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2006. Judgment in the case of Boicenco v. Moldova. 11 July 2006 , (Application no. 41088/05). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-76295. Consultation date: 12/08/2019.

GORBACHEVSKY, Vitaly Yakovlevich. 2013. “Precautions in modern justice” In: Legal Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. No. 1, pp. 215-219.

KIMLYK, Roman Vladimirovich. 2017. “Application of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in criminal proceedings” In: Development of Jurisprudence Problems and Prospects. No. 1, pp. 107-111.

LAW OF UKRAINE. 1997. On ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, the First Protocol and Protocols No 2, 4, 7 and 11 to the Convention. 1997, No. 475/97-ВР. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/475/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text. Consultation date: 12/02/2020.

NOR, Vasyl T; SHEVCHUK, Marta I. 2019. “Reasonable suspicion as a basis for choosing a measure of restraint and extending its term: the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and Ukrainian realities” In: Law and society. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 173-187.

OLASHIN, Marina Mykolayivna. 2015. “The use of bail in criminal proceedings: theoretical and practical aspects” In: European perspectives. No. 5, pp. 116-121.

PRYLUKA, Anna Yevheniivna. 2019. “The problem of proving the risks when choosing a measure of restraint in the form of detention” In: Scientific journal “Logos”. No. 4, pp. 219-221.

RYBALKO, Vladimir. 2015. “Evaluative concepts used in the regulation of collateral as a precautionary measure” In: Historical and legal journal. Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 130-135.

SHEVCHUK, Marta. 2020. “Features of the choice of precautionary measures in the form of house arrest and personal bail” In: Law and society. Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 185-297.

SIMONOVICH, David Vladimirovich. 2011. European standards for ensuring human rights in the pre-trial stages of the criminal process in Ukraine. In: NikaNova. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

TARAN, Olena Viktorivna; TSYUPRYK, Igor Vladimirovich. 2017. “The case law of the European Court of Human Rights on issues related to manifestations of terrorism” In: Legal Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. Vol. 2, No. 14, pp. 396-403.

TERTYSHNYK, Vladimir M. 2012. Application of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and norms of international legal acts in the improvement of criminal justice in Ukraine. Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine.

TERTYSHNYK, Vladimir M. 2016. “Implementation of legal positions and case law of the European Court of Human Rights in solving problems of criminal procedure law of Ukraine” In: Legal position. Vol. 1, No. 16, pp. 7-13.

TKALYCH, Maxym; SAFONCHYK, Oksana; TOLMACHEVSKA, Yuliia. 2020. “Derecho privado y derechos humanos: Nuevas realidades.” In: DIXI. Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 1-12.

TISHCHENKO, Valerii; BIELIK, Larysa; SAMOILENKO, Olena. 2019. “The specifics of the appointment of forensic examinations in the investigation of corruption-related crimes committed in cyberspace” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, No. 24, pp. 280-287.

TSYTRIAK, Viktor; KALININA, Iryna; HURINA Dariia. 2020. “Infrastructure of bribery in public official activity” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 9, No. 25, pp. 24-32.

UVAROV, Vladimir G. 2012. “Institute of precautionary measures under the new CPC of Ukraine in the context of international standards” In: Law and Society. No. 2, pp. 294-297.