Speculating Socio-Political Scenario of India In V. S. Naipaul’s “An Area of Darkness”. / Escenario sociopolítico especulativo de la India en “Un área de oscuridad” de V. S. Naipaul.
Resumen
ABSTRACT
Diaspora novels have brought a new sensation on the literary horizon painting their works of arts with multicultural colors. Naipaul wrote three indian travelogues on India. The major theme of the novel is alienation and isolation. It records the failure of his attempt to settle in India. In this novel, Naipaul began a painful confrontation with the civilization that nurtured him in his earliest years, and which marked him as a kind of resident alien in the west. An Area of Darkness was frankly personal. The novel embellishes the writer's precarious relationship as outsiders and insiders, resulting aggressive comments on Indian society's socio-political existence.
RESUMEN
Las novelas de la diáspora han traído una nueva sensación en el horizonte literario pintando sus obras de arte con colores multiculturales. Naipaul escribió tres relatos de viajes indios sobre la India. El tema principal de la novela es la alienación y el aislamiento. Registra el fracaso de su intento de establecerse en la India. En esta novela, Naipaul inicia un doloroso enfrentamiento con la civilización que lo nutrió en sus primeros años y que lo marcó como una especie de extraterrestre residente en occidente. Un área de oscuridad era francamente personal. La novela embellece la precaria relación del escritor como forasteros e internos, lo que resulta en comentarios agresivos sobre la existencia sociopolítica de la sociedad india.
Citas
AKHMETYANOV RG (2015). “Etymological dictionary of the Tatar language”. In two volumes. Iv: A-L-Kazan: “education-time” publ, p.543.
CHAKRABORTY, A (2019). “Violence, religion, and masculinism in contemporary India: an analysis of the writings of Vivekananda, Golwalkar, and Gandhi (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin City University)”.
DHALIWAL, S (2019). “From The East And West Indies To The Mother Country: The House of Daljinder Kaur And Out Of Left Field (Doctoral dissertation)”.
DHAWAN, RK (2000). “The West Indian Fiction”. New Delhi: Prestige Books.
EZEKIEL, N (1976). “Naipaul’s India and Mine”. Journal of South Asian Literature. USA: Michigan State University,11(4), pp.71-90.
FREEKS, FE (2016). “Old Testament figures as possible current “mentors”: Exploratory pastoral-theological reflections”. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, 30(2), pp.236-248.
GALIEVA LI, GALYAUTDINOV IG, KHUSNUTDINOV MZ (2006). “Mathematical Russian-Tatar dictionary. Bilingualism in the system of higher professional education: Tatar language: materials of the Republican scientific and practical conference”. Kazan: LLC "Center of operative printing”, pp.36 – 37.
HUMBATOVA, SI & HAJIYEV, NG (2019). “The role of spending on education and science in sustainable development”. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), pp.1704-1727. doi:10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2.
KOK, JK (2016). “Why (suffering) women matter for the heart of transformative missional theology perspectives on empowered women and mission in the New Testament and early Christianity”. HTS Theological Studies, 72(4), pp.1-7.
KUMAR, A (2020). “Every Day I Write the Book: Notes on Style”. Duke University Press.
MEHROTRA, AK (2003). “An Illustrated History of Indian Literature in English”. New Delhi: Permanent Black.
MITTAPALLI, R & HENSEN, M (2002). “VS Naipaul: Fiction and Travel Writing”. Atlantic Publishers & Dist.
MUSINA, GF (2012). “Terms of physics in the Tatar language: abstract dis”. Cand Philol. Sciences, Kazan, p.25.
NAIPAUL, VS (1964). “An Area of Darkness”. New Delhi: Replika Press.
PERERA, SW (2009). “Dismissive Diaries, Desiccated Journeys, and Reductive Fictions: Sri Lanka in the Writings of Donald Friend, Shiva Naipaul, and Julian West”. Journeys, 10(1), pp.82-106.
PRIYA, R, BISHT, R, RANDHAWA, P, ARORA, M, DOLLEY, J, MCGRANAHAN, G & MARSHALL, F (2017). “Local Environmentalism in Peri-Urban Spaces in India: Emergent Ecological Democracy?”.
RAI, S (1982). “VS. Naipaul: A study in expatriate sensibility”. New Delhi: Arnold-Heinemann.
RILEY, C (1975). “Contemporary Literary Criticism”. 4(3). Michigan: Gale Research Inc.
SAENKO, N, VORONKOVA, O, ZATSARINNAYA, E & MIKHAILOVA, M (2020). “Philosophical and cultural foundations of the concept of “nihitogenesis”.” Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(1), pp.88-103.
TSVETKOVA, M, ARUTYUNYAN, M, SAENKO, N, SHRAMKO, L & KALIMULLIN, D (2019). “Incorporation of philosophical ideas in science fiction literature”. [Incorporación de ideas filosóficas en la literatura de ciencia ficción] Opcion, 35(Special Issue 23), pp.598-612.
VOLCHIK, V & MASLYUKOVA, E (2019). “Trust and development in education and science”. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), pp.1444-1455. doi:10.9770/jesi. 2019.6.3(27).
