Problem-Based Questions in the Development of Theoretical Thinking

• TATYANA N. ISHCHENKO Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, Russia
• TATYANA A. STEPANENKO Siberian Fire and Rescue Academy of State Firefighting Service of Ministry of Russian Federation for Civil Defence, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters, Russia
• MARIA O. AKIMOVA Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, Russia

Resumen

ABSTRACT

 

Problem-based questions (PBQs) are mastered in the process of learning the subject matter and developing the ability to think. Constructing PBQs enabled students to develop their ability to consciously handle notions, formulate statements, make conclusions, and reveal contradictions. The ability to operate a system of notions while posing questions and looking for answers to them encourages meaningful communication.The findings were used to develop and implement an advanced training course for university teachers. The booster of theoretical thinking helps to switch from declarative knowledge given by a teacher to its joint discovery with learners.

RESUMEN

 

Las preguntas basadas en problemas (PBQ) se dominan en el proceso de aprender el tema y desarrollar la capacidad de pensar. La construcción de PBQ permitió a los estudiantes desarrollar su capacidad para manejar conscientemente nociones, formular declaraciones, sacar conclusiones y revelar contradicciones. La capacidad de operar un sistema de nociones mientras se plantean preguntas y se buscan respuestas fomenta la comunicación significativa. Los resultados se utilizaron para desarrollar e implementar un curso de formación avanzada para profesores universitarios. El refuerzo del pensamiento teórico ayuda a pasar del conocimiento declarativo proporcionado por un profesor a su descubrimiento conjunto con los alumnos.

Citas

AHMAD, S, PRAHMANA, RCI, KENEDI, AK, HELSA, Y, ARIANIL, Y & ZAINIL, M (2017). “The instruments of higher order thinking skills”. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 9(3), pp.1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012053

ALDERSON-DAY, B & FERNYHOUGH, C (2015). “Inner speech: development, cognitive functions, phenomenology and neurobiology”. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), pp.931-965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000021

ALONZO, AC & KIM, J (2018). “Affordances of video-based professional development for supporting physics teachers' judgments about evidence of student thinking”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(6), pp.283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.008

BUTLER, HA, PENTONEY, C & BONG, MP (2017). “Predicting real-world outcomes: Critical thinking ability is a better predictor of life decisions than intelligence”. Thinking Skils and Creativity, 2(5), pp.38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2017.06.005

CHENG, VMY (2019). “Developing individual creativity for environmental sustainability: Using an everyday theme in higher education”. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3), pp.100-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.05.001

CLACK, J (2017). “Distinguishing between ‘macro’ and ‘micro’ possibility thinking: Seen and unseen creativity”. Thinking Skils and Creativity, 26, 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.003

DARLING-HAMMOND, L, FLOOK, L, COOK-HARVEY, C, BARRON, B, OSHER, D (2020). “Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development”. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), pp.97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

DAVYDOV, VV (1996). Theory of Developmental Learning. Moscow: Intor.

DE BOER, H, DONKER, AS, KOSTONS, DDNM, VAN DER & WERF, GPC (2018). “Long-term effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on student academic performance: A meta-analysis” // Educational Research Review, 2(4), pp.98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.002

ERIKSON, MG & ERIKSON, M (2019). “Learning outcomes and critical thinking–good intentions in conflict studies in Higher Education”. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), pp.2293-2303. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1486813

FRANCO, AR & VIEIRA, RM (2019). “Promoting critical thinking in higher education in the context of teacher professional development”. 5th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’19) Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/HEAd19.2019.9077

GONCHARUK, AI (2002). The concept of the school of the XXI century (the dialectic of the educational process). Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State University.

GRIFFY-BROWN, C (2019). “Addressing the Challenges of Technology in Society: Including more Voices, Addressing Institutional Constraints, and Driving New Theoretical and Methodological Thinking”. Technology in Society, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(19)30049-1

GROTH, RE, AUSTIN, JW, NAUMANN, M & RICKARDS, М (2019). “Toward a theoretical structure to characterize early probabilistic thinking”. Math Ed Res J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00287-w

HERAS, M & RUIZ-MALLÉN, I (2018). “What do I like about science-related activities? Stability and Change in Science Education – Meeting Basic Learning Needs”. Leiden: Brill Publ. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391635_012

HERNÁNDEZ DE VELAZCO, Judith .J., CHUMACEIRO HERNANDEZ, Ana C. , RAVINA RIPOLL, R & DEL RIO, Nacira (2019). “Gestión ciudadana como corresponsabilidad del desarrollo social. Construcción desde la política pública en Colombia”. Opción, Año 35, Regular No.89-2: 706-730.

ILYENKOV, E.V. (1984). Dialectical Logic: Essays on History and Theory. Moscow: Politizdat.

ISHCHENKO, TN (2010). “Problematic issue as an intellectual means of cognition”. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 1(4), pp.92-101.

ISHCHENKO, TN (2019). “Philosophy as a resource for the development of the subject of knowledge”. Scientific Opinion: Scientific Journal, 10(5), pp.31-38. https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2019.10.31.38

KULESHOVA, IG, KISELNIKOV, IV & BREITIGAM, EK (2019). “Stages of understanding educational material: The issues of contents”. Science for Education Today, 9(5), pp.97–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1905.06

LAURSEN, LN & HAASE, LM (2019). “The Shortcomings of Design Thinking When Compared to Designerly Thinking”, The Design Journal, 22(6), pp.813–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1652531

LOBASTOV, GV (2012). The dialectics of a rational form and the phenomenology of insanity. Moscow: Russian Panorama.

MSONDE, SE & AALST, JV (2017). “Designing for interaction, thinking and academic achievement in a Tanzanian undergraduate chemistry course”. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), pp.1389–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9531-4

RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R., MARCANO, M., RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R., LAY RABY, N & HERRERA TAPIAS, B (2019). “Relationship Between social intelligence and resonant leadership in public health Institutions”. Opción. Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 35(90), pp.2477-9385.

SCHRÜFER, G, WRENGER, K & LINDEMANN, I (2020). “Reflectories” for the Promotion of Competences in Education for Sustainable Development Using the Example of Climate Change”. Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 2(5), pp.152-174. http://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2020-2-152-174

SHAFTO, P, GOODMAN, ND & GRIFFITHS, TL (2014). “A rational account of pedagogical reasoning: Teaching by, and learning from, examples”. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), pp.55–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.004

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, JOSÉ VICENTE & GANGA CONTRERAS, FRANCISCO. 2018. “Tecnoempresa y Tecnocimiento: Una Perspectiva desde la Bioética Empresarial”. Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science. Vol. 7, No. 3: 214-230. Unievangélica Centro Universitario, (Brasil).

VYGOTSKY, LS (2017). Thinking and speech. St. Petersburg: Peter.

WELLING, H (2007). “Four mental operations in creative cognition: The importance of abstraction”. Creativity Research Journal, 19(3), pp.163‒177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397214