Rhetorical Categories of Ethos, Logos and Pathos: Sounding Judicial Speech of Lawyers

  • M.V. YAKUTINA Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • L.V. MILYAEVA Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation
  • L.Y. TARASOVA Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation
  • P.P. ROSTOVTSEVA Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation
Palabras clave: Ethos, logos, pathos, prosody./ Ethos, prosodia.

Resumen

ABSTRACT

 

The article presents a phonetic comparative analysis of sounding judicial speech based on three classical rhetorical categories: ethos, logos, pathos. The material includes authentic audio recordings of court speeches by American lawyers with the necessary professional and general cultural competences in the US Supreme Court, which was reflected at the prosodic level of their speech. The vivid, influencing speech nature based on pathos and ethos, polemic, and suggestive discourse based on logos are reflected not only in the variability of basic frequency but in various dynamic and temporal characteristics, depending on the rhetorical category on which they were based.

RESUMEN

 

El artículo presenta un análisis fonético comparativo del sonido del discurso judicial basado en tres categorías retóricas clásicas: ethos, logos, pathos. El material incluye grabaciones de audio auténticas de discursos de la corte de abogados estadounidenses con las competencias culturales profesionales y generales necesarias en la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos, que se reflejó en el nivel prosódico de su discurso. La naturaleza del discurso vívida e influyente basada en el pathos y el ethos, el discurso polémico y sugestivo basado en logos se refleja no solo en la variabilidad de la frecuencia básica, sino en diversas características dinámicas y temporales, dependiendo de la categoría retórica.

Biografía del autor/a

M.V. YAKUTINA, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Graduated from Moscow Pedagogical University in 1994. The postgraduate course at Moscow State Linguistic University in 2002. Candidate of Philology. The author of many scientific articles and the participant of different national and international conferences and workshops. The sphere of scientific interests: forensic language, speech prosody, the prosody of public speech, foreign language education, and teaching methods. Associate professor of the Department of English and Professional Communication at the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation.
L.V. MILYAEVA, Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation
Graduated from Tulsa Teachers’ Training University named after Leo Tolstoy in 1997. In 2005 got Ph.D. in Philology at Moscow State Linguistic University, then finished a postdoctoral program at the same University. The author of 2 monographs, more than 20 articles and the participant of different conferences, projects, and workshops. The sphere of scientific interests: sociophonology, political discourse, discourse information structure and analysis, prosody, foreign language education, and teaching methods.
L.Y. TARASOVA, Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation
Graduated from Moscow State Open Teachers Training University in 1997. Since 2001 was a Senior Lecturer Moscow International School of Business. Since 2013 has been a lecturer in Financial University teaching “Professional Communication in English”. The author of many scientific articles and the participant of different national and international conferences. The sphere of scientific interests: foreign language education and teaching methods, philology.
P.P. ROSTOVTSEVA, Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation
Graduated from Moscow State Linguistic University in 1998. In 2013 got Ph.D. in Pedagogy at Moscow Military University. The author of many scientific articles and the participant of different national and international conferences and workshops. The sphere of scientific interests: foreign language education and teaching methods, theory, and methods of professional education and training.

Citas

AKIM, K, KARA-MURZA, G, SAENKO, N, SUHARYANTO, A, & KALIMULLIN, D (2019). “Superhero movie: Breaking the challenges of topics in the modern epos”. [Película de superhéroes: Rompiendo los desafíos de los temas en los epos modernos] Opcion, 35(Special Issue 22), pp. 1408-1428.

BONICA, A, & CHILTON, AS (2015). “The political ideologies of American lawyers”. Journal of legal analysis.

BUBLIENĖ, R, & JURKEVIČIUS, V (2019). “Multiple discrimination and inequality: A comparative analysis of the European court's case law in the context of sustainable business development”. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), pp. 1246-1257.

DICKSON-LA PRADE, D (2020). “Analyzing Ethos and Pathos”.

FROLOVA, I, VORONKOVA, O, ALEKHINA, N, KOVALEVA, I, PRODANOVA, N, & KASHIRSKAYA, L (2019). “Corruption as an obstacle to sustainable development: A regional example”. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 7(1), pp. 674-689.

GRIGORIEVA, O (2017). “Constitutional basis for international cooperation of the union of soviet socialist republics”. Giornale Di Storia Costituzionale, 33(1), pp. 109-120.

IRONS, P, & GUITTON, S (1993). “May it please the court”. New York: The New Press. p. 376.

IVYGINA, A, PUPYSHEVA, E, & MUKHAMETSHINA, D (2019). “Formation of sociocultural competence among foreign students”. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), pp. 288-314.

KOLMAKOV, V, POLYAKOVA, A, & POLYAKOV, S (2019). “A valuation approach to the Russian liberal establishment consolidation”. Administratie Si Management Public, 2019(32), pp. 93-107.

KOROLOVA, T, & AKKURT, V (2019). “Perceptive peculiarities of the prosody of persuasion: modality in judicial discourse”. Odessa.

MAGSUMOV, TA (2019). “Apprenticeship in secondary vocational schools during the economic modernization in late imperial Russia”. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 8(1), pp. 215-221.

MANZIN, M, & TOMASI, S (2014). “Ethos and pathos in legal argumentation. 8th International Conference on Argumentation”. pp. 930-941. The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.

NIKIFOROVA, ESH (2014). “The main tactics of the strategy of emotional impact in the American judicial discourse”. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 6, pp. 66-69. (in Russa).

POLETAEV, DI (1998). “Social Differentiation of Intonation in a Limited Speech Community”. p. 153. (Doctoral dissertation). Moscow. (in Russa).

RAHMADI, I, HAYATI, E, & NURSYIFA, A (2020). “Comparing Pre-service Civic Education Teachers’ TPACK Confidence Across Course Modes”. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(2), pp. 113-133.

SASONGKO, G, HURUTA, AD, & WARDANI, A (2019). “Does Wagner’s Law exist in a strategic national area?”. Evidence from Kedungsepur - Indonesia, Insights into Regional Development,1(2), pp. 99-117.

TSVETKOVA, M, ARUTYUNYAN, M, SAENKO, N, SHRAMKO, L, & KALIMULLIN, D (2019). “Incorporation of philosophical ideas in science fiction literature”. [Incorporación de ideas filosóficas en la literatura de ciencia ficción] Opcion, 35(23), pp. 598-612.

WILDES, A (2020). “The Unethical Practice of Omitting Language in State Science Standards: Denying Students True Democratic Freedom”. Journal Of Curriculum Studies Research, 2(1), pp. 112-128.

Publicado
2020-09-18
Cómo citar
YAKUTINA, M., MILYAEVA, L., TARASOVA, L., & ROSTOVTSEVA, P. (2020). Rhetorical Categories of Ethos, Logos and Pathos: Sounding Judicial Speech of Lawyers. Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(1), 111-120. Recuperado a partir de https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/33676
Número
Vol. 25 (2020): Extra 7 [Interlocuciones]
Sección
Artículos