Sensorial transparency in Thrillers’ dread scenes
Resumen
ABSTRACT
In a previous paper, the researchers Lama Abu Hassan and Kifah Al Omari provide a new definition for the phenomenology of transparency in thriller films. Accordingly, they suggest that it is possible to extract three forms of transparency; the personal, substance, and sensorial transparency. They thoroughly discuss these forms, taking the film HUSH directed by Mike Flanagan as a case study. This paper concentrates more on sensorial transparency, arguing that it is the form that best fits the cinematic dread prototype. The researchers provide many examples that help to understand its effect and level of engagement with the viewers.
RESUMEN
En un artículo anterior, los investigadores Lama Abu Hassan y Kifah Al Omari proporcionaron una nueva definición para la fenomenología de la transparencia en las películas de suspenso. En consecuencia, sugieren que es posible extraer tres formas de transparencia; la transparencia personal, substancial y sensorial. Discuten a fondo estas formas, tomando la película HUSH dirigida por Mike Flanagan como un estudio de caso. Este artículo se concentra más en la transparencia sensorial, argumentando que es la forma que mejor se adapta al prototipo de terror cinematográfico. Los investigadores proporcionan muchos ejemplos que ayudan a comprender mejor su efecto y el nivel de compromiso con los espectadores.
Citas
AXBERG, RLJ (2011). “Empathy as a Factor of the Sublime and Beautiful in a WildernessEnironment”. [Electronic Resource].
BRADFORD, R (2016). “Journey through Dark: An Analysis of the Creation of Harry Roat in Wait Until Dark”. Doctoral dissertation, Regent University.
DELEUZE, G (1992). “Cinema 1 : The movement-image”. Athlone, London.
DEMME, J (1991). “The Silence of the Lambs”. Demme Productions.
FEDE, A (2016). “Don’t Breathe”. Screen Gems, Stage 6 Films, Ghost House Pictures.
HANICH, J (2010). “Cinematic emotion in horror films and thrillers : The aesthetic paradox of pleasurable fear”. Routledge, London.
HITCHCOCK, A (1995). “Hitchcock on Hitchcock : Selected writings and interviews”. Faber and Faber, London.
HUANG, MC, & CHANG, BJ (2019). “Sleeping with the enemy”. Management Decision.
KNIGHT, L (2019). “Bond 25; Blofeld return is ‘like Silence of the Lambs”. Daily Mirror Online.
MARIN, MM, & LEDER, H (2013). “Examining complexity across domains: relating subjective and objective measures of affective environmental scenes, paintings and music”. Plos One 8(8), pp. 1-35.
MARKS, L (2000). “The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses”. Duke University Press, Durham, and London.
MCCARDELL, EE (2001). “Catching the Ball: Constructing the reciprocity of embodiment. Murdoch”.
MERLEAU-PONTY, M (2002). “Phenomenology of Perception”. Routledge, London.
MIKE, F (2016). “Hush”. Intrepid Pictures, Blumhouse Productions.
MOONEY, T (2017). “Repression and operative unconsciousness in the phenomenology of perception”. In Unconsciousness between Phenomenology and Psychoanalysis, pp. 61-74.
RUBEN, J (1991). “Sleeping with the Enemy”. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.
SMITH, M (1994). “Altered States : Character and Emotional Response in the Cinema”. Cinema Journal 33 (4), pp. 34–56.
SOBCHACK, V (1990). “The Active Eye: A Phenomenology of Cinematic Vision.” Quarterly Review of the film and video 12 (3), pp. 21–36.
SOBCHACK, V (2016). “The Active Eye”: Toward a Phenomenology of Cinematic Movement.
VAN, MM (2007). “Phenomenology of Practice.” Phenomenology & Practice 1(1), pp. 11–30.
YOUNG, T (1967). “Wait Until Dark”. Warner Bros, USA