Disputes between US vs Iran regarding nuclear issues: Harian Analisa coverage, Indonesia

• U ABDUL RANI Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
• M.S. HAMDANI Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
• S AZMAN Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Palabras clave: Audience, Harian Analisa newspaper, Iran’s nuclear issue, Media’s ideology. / Audiencia, Ideología de los medios, Problemática nuclear de Irán, Periódico Harian Analisa.

Resumen

ABSTRACT

 

Several strengths play a part to produce the facts, such as readers, ideology, organization, and economic reputation are of those variables that affect the contents of the news. The Harian Analisa newspaper whose owner is a Muslim and its audience is the Indonesian Islamic community, affects the ideology possessed by this newspaper as an ideology of defense to Muslim citizens. So, it can be undoubtedly assumed that the news presented in it regarding the disputed between America and Iran will carry protection to Iran as the majority of its citizens is Muslim.

RESUMEN

 

Una serie de fortalezas que juegan un papel importante para producir los hechos, como lectores, ideología, organización y reputación económica, son las variables que afectan el contenido de las noticias. El periódico Harian Analisa, cuyo dueño es musulmán y su audiencia es la comunidad islámica indonesia, afecta la ideología que posee este periódico como ideología de defensa para los ciudadanos musulmanes. Por lo tanto, se puede suponer indudablemente que las noticias presentadas en relación con la disputa entre Estados Unidos e Irán llevarán una defensa a Irán, ya que la mayoría de sus ciudadanos son musulmanes.

Citas

BENNETT, J (2015). “Introduction the Utopia of independent media: independence, working with freedom and working for free”. In James Bennett & Niki Strange (Eds.), Media independence, working with freedom and working for free, pp. 1-30. New York, NY: Routledge.

BOYATZIS, RE (1998). “Thematic analysis and code development: Transforming qualitative information”. London and New Delhi: Sage Publications

CURTIN, PA (1999). “Reevaluating public relations information subsidies: Market-driven journalism and agenda-building theory and practice”. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(1), pp. 53-90.

GOLDING, P, & MURDOCK, G (1991). “Culture, communications and political economy”. Mass media and society, 2, pp. 15-32.

GUNARATNE, S, & HASIM, MS (1996). “Social Responsibility Theory Revisited a Comparative Study of Public Journalism and Developmental Journalism”. Javnost-The Public, 3(3), pp. 97-107.

KOOSHA, M, & SHAMS, MR (2005). “A Critical Study of News Discourse: Iran's Nuclear Issue in the British Newspapers”. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), pp. 107-141.

LEE, ST (2010). “Peace journalism: Principles and structural limitations in the news coverage of three conflicts”. Mass Communication and Society, 13(4), pp. 361-384.

NURAINUN, A (2017). “Analisis Perbandingan Isi Tajuk Rencana Surat Kabar: Studi Deskriptif tentang Isi Tajuk Rencana Surat Kabar Harian Analisa dan Waspada [Comparative Analysis of Newspaper of Tajuk Rencana: Descriptive Study of Harian Analisa and Harian Waspada]”. Skripsi Strata 1. Medan: Universitas Medan Area.

RANA, KS (2018). “Bilateral diplomacy”. The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy, pp. 1-11.

SHOEMAKER, PJ, & REESE, SD (1996). “Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content”. White Plains, NY: Longman.

STEPHENSON, B (2018). “Does America Spend Too Much on Diplomacy?”. Foreign Service Journal.

TEJKALOVÁ, AN, DE BEER, AS, BERGANZA, R, KALYANGO JR, Y, AMADO, A, OZOLINA, L, & MASDUKI, B (2017). “In Media We Trust: Journalists and institutional trust perceptions in post-authoritarian and post-totalitarian countries”. Journalism Studies, 18(5), pp. 629-644.

VAN DIJK, TA (1995). “Power and the news media”. Political communication and action, 6(1), pp. 9-36.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J & RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R (2018). “El derecho a la autobiografía: dimensión ius-filosófica desde la perspectiva de H. Arendt y P. Ricoeur”. Opción. Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 34(18), pp. 1012-1587.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J; RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R & DÍAZ-CID, L (2019). “Bioética y biopoder: Perspectivas para una praxis pedagógica desde la ética de Álvaro Márquez-Fernández”. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, Revista Internacional de Filosofía y Teoría Social, 24(87), pp. 65-77.

WILSON, S, & IBRAHIM, F (2018). “Diplomacy in Reporting: The Sulu Conflict in East Borneo”. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(3).