The right to self-determination as a strategy to dispute the legal field. / El derecho a la autodeterminación como estrategia para la disputa en el campo jurídico.
Resumen
ABSTRACT
This article proposes several reflections on the development of human rights, in particular the right to self-determination. As a framework of interpretation, I claim that self-determination has had drastic perspectives and it can constitute an important instrument to support the emancipation process promoted by social movements. The methodology developed was grounded on a theoretical, historical and bibliographic analysis, taken into account the main milestones of the legalization of the right to self-determination. In that sense is illustrated the case of the global indigenous movement, which reinterpreted the notion of self-determination through the Bolivian Constitution and the concept of Sumak Kawsay
RESUMEN
El presente artículo lleva una reflexión crítica-propositiva de los derechos humanos y el derecho a la autodeterminación. Como marco de interpretación propongo que el derecho a la autodeterminación ha generado diferentes interpretaciones y puede constituirse en un baluarte para los procesos de emancipación social promovidos por distintos movimientos sociales. La metodología desarrollada consistió en un análisis teórico, histórico y bibliográfico de los principales hitos de la legalización internacional a la autodeterminación. En este sentido presento como ejemplo el caso del movimiento indígena global, el cual reinterpretó la noción de autodeterminación a través del concepto de la constitución boliviana Sumak Kawsay.
Citas
BOURDIEU, P (1986). The Force of Law: Toward a sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law. Journal, 38 (5).
MANUEL, C (2015). “Lo plurinacional” como reto histórico avances y retrocesos desde la experiencia boliviana. En: Constitucionalismo, descolonización y pluralismo jurídico en América latina.Translated by me. “Lo plurinacional” como reto histórico avances y retrocesos desde la experiencia boliviana. En: Constitucionalismo, descolonización y Ed. Centro de Estudios Jurídicos y Sociales Mispat NEPE - Universidad Federal de S.
CASSESE, A (1995). Self-determination of people. Legal reappraisal. Henkin editor. Cambridge University Press.
CASTRO GÓMEZ S (2005). La hybris del punto cero. Ciencia, raza e ilustración en la Nueva Granada (1750-1816). Universidad Javeriana.
COBBAN, A (1969). The nation-state and national self-determination. London Collins.
CRAWFORD, J (1999) State Practice and International Law in Relation to Secession, Clarendon Press.
DE SOUSA B (2007). Beyond Abyssal Thinking: From global lines to an ecology of knowledge. Sep. de: Review, 30(1), Binghamton: Fernand Braudel Centre.
ESCUDERO J. (2017) Self-Determination and Humanitarian Secession in International Law of a Globalized World. Springer.
FABRICANT, N. (2012). Mobilizing Bolivia’s displaced. Indigenous politics & struggles over land. The University of North Carolina Press chapel hill.
FANON F (2008). Black skin, white masks. Grover press.
FANON, F (2004). The Wretched of the Earth. Translated from the French by Richard Philcox. Grover press.
GHANEA N. & XANTHAKI A (2004). Minorities, people and self-determination. Brill academic publishers.
GULLIVER, P (1963) Social Control in an African Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
HOUTART, F. (2011). El concepto de Sumak Kawsay (Buen Vivir) y su Correspondencia con el bien común de la humanidad. América Latina en Movimiento translated by me.
LAUWERS, G., and S. SMIS. (2000). New Dimensions of the Right to Self-determination: A Study of the International Response to the Kosovo Crisis. N & EP6: 43–70.
MACÍAS, L. (2011). Sumak Kawsay. La vida en plenitud. América Latina en Movimiento. Editorial Época, Volumen II. Editorial Época, Volumen II.
MOORE, S. (2001). Certainties have undone: fifty turbulent years of legal anthropology, 1949-1999. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7.
MOYN, S (2010). The last utopia. Harvard University Press.
PACARI, N. (1984). Las culturas nacionales en el estado multinacional ecuatoriano. Revista del banco central de Ecuador. N 6, 113-123.
PELLET, A. (1991). ChapitreIX:‘Cooperationéconomiqueetsocialeinternationale’.Article55,alinéas (a) et (b). In La Charte des Nations Unies. Commentaire article par article, ed. J.P. Cot and A. Pellet, 2nd ed., 841–861. Paris/Brussels: Economica/Bruylant.
PRZETACZNIK, F, A (1999). Definition of Peace, 11 Sri Lanka Journal of International Law
RAIC, David (2002). Statehood and the law of self-determination. Kluwer law international Press.
RUBIO MEDINA, E. (2019). Tres teorías sobre el derecho a la autodeterminación. Diálogos De Saberes, (50), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.18041/0124-0021/dialogos.50.2019.5555
RYNGAERT, C. (2010). The ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo's Declaration of Independence: A Mixed Opportunity?: International Court of Justice, Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010. NILR 57: 481–494.
TERRETTA, M (2013). From below and to the left. Human Rights and Liberations Politics in Africa´s Postcolonial Age. Journal of World History, Volume 24, Number 2, June 13.
THE SELF-DETERMINATION OF PEOPLES (1981.). In The International Bill of Rights: The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, ed. L. Henkin, 95–113. New York: Columbia University Press.
THORNBERRY P, (2000) ‘Self-Determination and Indigenous Peoples: Objections and Responses’, in P. Aikio and M. Scheinin (eds.) Operationalizing the Right of Indigenous Peoples to Self-Determination (Turlen: Institute for Human Rights, Åbo Akademi University, pp. 39-64
THUSNET, M (1984). An Essay on Rights. Texas L. Wisconsin Law Review. Volume 62, Number 8.
TOMASELLI, A. (2016). Exploring indigenous self-government and forms of autonomy. En E. b. Short, In Handbook of Indigenous People´s Rights.
VIRALLY, M. (1983). Panorama de droit international contemporain (Cours général de droit international public). Recueil des cours 183: 9–382.