Human nature and nature of power
Resumen
ABSTRACT
The resource to the phenomena of human nature and power nature is dictated in a way by the belief that there is much more than only correlation and proportionality between them: these are two forms of sociality. Power still carries out a crucial function in society: it helps a person orient himself in life and defend off all metamorphoses and distortions of power. The ontological status of two phenomena is possible when true sociality is achieved, that is what we call humanity. The main methods used in writing this article are the method of historical and logical unity and the method of comparative analysis.
RESUMEN
El recurso a los fenómenos de la naturaleza humana está dictado en cierto modo por la creencia de que hay mucho más que solo correlación y proporcionalidad entre ellos: estas son dos formas de socialidad. El poder aún cumple una función crucial en la sociedad: ayuda a una persona a orientarse en la vida y a defenderse de todas las metamorfosis. El estado ontológico de dos fenómenos es posible cuando se logra la verdadera socialidad, lo que llamamos humanidad. Los principales métodos utilizados para escribir el artículo son el método histórico, la unidad lógica y el método de análisis comparativo.
Citas
BARRIS, J (2018). “Deep Disagreement and the virtues of argumentative and epistemic incapacity”. Informal Logic, 38(3), pp. 369-408.
BIBIKHIN, VV (1995). The World. Tomsk: Vodoley. p. 144.}
CIMENT, J (2015). World Terrorism: An Encyclopedia of Political Violence from Ancient Times to the Post. Routledge.
FOREMAN, P (2018). Historical and Philosophical Foundations of Inclusive Education. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
FOUCAULT, M. (2002). “On Human Nature”. Justice versus Power. Intellectuals and Power: Selected Political Papers, Speeches, and Interviews, Translated from French by S. C. Ofertas, edited by V.P. Vizgin and B.M. Skuratov. Moscow: Praxis. p. 384.
HUSSERL, E (2013). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. Springer Science & Business Media.
HORVATH, A, & SZAKOLCZAI, A (2018). “Political Anthropology”. Sage Handbook of Political Sociology, London: Sage, especially, pp.195-198.
IBRAGIMOVA, ZZ (2016). “On the Non-Obviousness of Our Readiness for Freedom as a Condition for Mastering Our Own Nature”. Scientific Notes of Kazan University. Series Humanities. Vol. 158, Book pp.1154-1163.
LASSWELL, HD (2017). Power and society: A framework for political inquiry. Routledge.
MAXCY, SJ (2003). “Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism”. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, pp. 51-89.
SARTRE, JP (2007). Existentialism is a Humanism. Yale University Press.
SMITH, PK, & MAGEE, JC (2015). “The interpersonal nature of power and status”. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 3, pp. 152-156.
VLASOVA, OA (2014). Anti-Psychiatry: Social Theory and Social Practice [Antipsikhiatriya: sotsial'naya teoriya I sotsial'naya praktika]. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ. p. 432.
WILSON, EO (2012). On human nature. Harvard University Press.
