Is The Sociopath Socially Intelligent? A New Framework For Understanding Sociopathy
Resumen
ABSTRACT
The characteristics of sociopathy vary in the context of its overlap with the concept of "psychopathy, and anti-social personality". The characteristic of social intelligence is associated with who is infected with sociopathy. Therefore, this article was designed to follow the scientific heritage of sociopathy, to specify its characteristics, and to analyze them in order to clarify the possibility of describing the sociopath as being intelligent socially. In light of the analysis of the concept of social intelligence, it is not possible to describe the sociopath as being intelligent socially, even if he has apparent superficial charm.
RESUMEN
Las características de la sociopatía varían en el contexto de su superposición con el concepto de "psicopatía y personalidad antisocial". La característica de la inteligencia social está asociada con quién está indentificado con sociopatía. Por lo tanto, este artículo fue diseñado para seguir el patrimonio científico de la sociopatía, para especificar sus características y analizarlas con el fin de aclarar la posibilidad de describir al sociópata como inteligente socialmente. A la luz del análisis del concepto de inteligencia social, no es posible describir al sociópata como inteligente socialmente, incluso si tiene un aparente encanto superficial.
Citas
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BORUM, R, BARTEL, P, & FORTH, A (2002). Manual for the structured assessment for violence risk in youth (SAVRY). Consultation version. Tampa, Florida: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute.
BOUCHARD, TJ, JR, LYKKEN, DT, MCGUE, M, SEGAL, NL, & TELLEGEN, A (1990). “Sources of Human Psychological Differences. The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart.”, in: Science 250 (4978), pp.223–228.
CANTOR, N, & KIHLSTROM, J (1989). Social Intelligence & Cognitive Assessment of Personality, in: Wyer, R, Srull, T, Editors Advance in Social Cognition. Vol. 11. Social Intelligence & Cognitive Assessment of Personality Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
CHRISTOPHER, JP (1997). Deconstructing Psychopathy, Psychological Inquiry 1997: pp.244-251. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Taylor & Francis Group).
CLECKLEY, H (1988). The Mask of Sanity: An Attempt to Clarify Some Issues About the So Called Psychopathic Personality. scanned facsimile produced for non-profit educational use.
CUNNINGHAM, TDJ (1998). Components of Greenspan's 1979 model of social intelligence with 18 to 24 year old adults with learning disabilities.
ELLIS, BB, & PENNER, LA (1983). “Individual Differences in Reactions to Inequitable Exchanges”, in: Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 114(1), pp.91-98.
ENGEL, B (2011). The Jekyll and Hyde Syndrome: What to Do If Someone in Your Life Has a Dual Personality-Or If You Do. John Wiley & Sons.
FURNHAM, A, RICHARDS, SC, & PAULHUS, DL (2013). “The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review”, in: Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), pp.199-216.
GARDNER, H (2004). “Audiences for the theory of multiple intelligences”, in: Teachers College Record, 106, pp.212–220.
GOLEMAN, D (1995). Emotional Intelligence, New York: Bantam Books.
GOLEMAN, D (2006). Social Intelligence: The New Science of Social Relationship, New York, Hutchinson.
HARE, RD (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
BABIAK, P, & HARE, RD (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York, NY, US.
LALICH, J, & TOBIAS, M (2006). Take Back Your Life: Recovering from Cults & Abusive Relationships, (Chapter 4), 2nd edition, Bay Tree Publishing, Berkeley, California.
LAZARUS, RS, & MONAT, A (1974). Cognitive and coping processes in emotion. Fifty Years of the Research and Theory of RS Lazarus: An Analysis of Historical and Perennial Issues, pp.70-84.
MACKENZIE, PM (2014). Psychopathy, Antisocial Personality & Sociopathy: The Basics A History Review. The Forensic Examiner.
MARLOWE, HA (1986). “Social Intelligence: Evidence for Multidimensionality & Construct Independence”, in: Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), pp.52- 58.
MCGREGOR, J (2013). The empathy trap: Understanding antisocial personalities. Sheldon Press.
MCGREGOR, JE, & MCGREGOR, T (2014). The sociopath at the breakfast table: Recognizing and dealing with antisocial and manipulative people. Hunter House.
MEALEY, L (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain sciences, 18(3), pp.523-541.
MERRIAM-WEBSTER’S COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY (2004). Eleventh Edition. Springfield MA: Merriam-Webster Inc.
PEMMENT, J (2013). “Psychopathy versus sociopathy: Why the distinction has become crucial”, in: Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(5), pp.458-461.
PERRY, C (2015). “The “Dark Traits” of Sociopathic Leaders: Could They Be a Threat to Universities?”, in: Australian Universities' Review, 57(1), pp.17-25.
RIGGIO, RE, MESSAMER, J, & THROCKMORTON, B (1991). “Social and academic intelligence: Conceptually distinct but overlapping constructs”, in: Personality and individual Differences, 12(7), pp.695-702.
SHOWERS, C, & CANTOR, N (1985). “Social cognition: A look at motivated strategies”, in: Annual review of psychology, 36(1), pp.275-305.
SILVERA, D, MARTINUSSEN, M, & DAHL, TI (2001). “The Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, a self‐report measure of social intelligence”, in: Scandinavian journal of psychology, 42(4), pp.313-319.
STOUT, M (2005). The Sociopath Next Door Broadway Book, Random House, Inc. New York.
THOMAS, ME (2014). Confessions of a sociopath: A life spent hiding in plain sight. Broadway Books.
VASIĽOVÁ, K, & BAUMGARTNER, F (2005). Why is social intelligence difficult to measure. Internetový časopis Človek a spoločnosť, 8(4).
WONG, CMT, DAY, JD, MAXWELL, SE, & MEARA, NM (1995). “A multitrait-multimethod study of academic and social intelligence in college students”, in: Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), p.117.
ZIRKEL, S (2000). Social intelligence: The development and maintenance of purposive behavior. R. Bar-On y JDA Parker, The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence. Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application at Home, School, and in the Workplace, pp.3-27.
