Beneficios de las técnicas modernas de imágenes en Medicina

  • Danila Andreevich Bogomolov Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5802-2080
  • Anton Evgenievich Antonov Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry», Moscow, Russian Federation. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7368-1634
  • Aleksandr Igorevich Ilin Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry», Moscow, Russian Federation. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5532-0506
  • Margarita Vladimirovna Beliaeva Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry», Moscow, Russian Federation. https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0239-786X
  • Tatiana Andreevna Bogomolova I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6228-7664
Palabras clave: Imagenología, radiografía, tomografía computarizada, ecografía

Resumen

Relevancia. Durante más de 100 años, la práctica médica ha utilizado métodos de imagen para observar cambios patológicos localizados en el cuerpo humano. El primer método fue la radiografía, que se hizo popular entre los médicos, pero luego resultó que la alta exposición a la radiación aumenta la incidencia de enfermedades tumorales, por lo que se desarrollaron estándares para las dosis de radiación permitidas para pacientes y radiólogos. La introducción de agentes de contraste radiológico también tuvo contraindicaciones que conviene tener en cuenta. La ecografía, la tomografía computarizada (TC), la resonancia magnética (RM) y los métodos de angiografía han aumentado significativamente las capacidades de diagnóstico de los métodos instrumentales. El propósito de esta revisión es analizar las ventajas y desventajas de los métodos modernos de imagen en Medicina. Métodos. Para lograr el propósito de la revisión, se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en las bases de datos Google Scholar y PubMed. Resultados. 1) La principal indicación del método de rayos X es la visualización de estructuras óseas. 2) Los métodos de contraste radiológico son óptimos para estudiar órganos huecos y vasos sanguíneos. 3) La ventaja de la resonancia magnética es la capacidad de visualizar bien los tejidos blandos. 4) La TC ayuda a reconstruir la arquitectura espacial de los órganos. 5) La ecografía permite observar el estado del embrión y el feto, así como de los órganos internos.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Danila Andreevich Bogomolov, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Student of Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow.

Anton Evgenievich Antonov, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry», Moscow, Russian Federation.

Student of Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow.

Aleksandr Igorevich Ilin, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry», Moscow, Russian Federation.

Student of Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow.

Margarita Vladimirovna Beliaeva, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry», Moscow, Russian Federation.

Student of Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Yevdokimov A. I. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow.

Tatiana Andreevna Bogomolova, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Student of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenovskiy University), Moscow, Russian
Federation.

Citas

Arnold M.J., Keung J.J., McCarragher B. (2019) Interventional Radiology: Indications and Best Practices. Am Fam Physician. 99(9): 547-556.

Balakhonova T.V., Ershova A.I., Ezhov M.V., Barabash O.L., Bershtein L.L., Bogachev V.Yu., et al. (2022) Focused ultrasound investigation of vessels. Cardiovascular Therapy and Preventive Care. 21(7): 105-126. doi: 10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3333.

Cartwright S.L., Knudson M.P. (2015) Diagnostic imaging of acute abdominal pain in adults. Am Fam Physician. 91(7): 452-9.

Casali M., Lauri C., Altini C., Bertagna F., Cassarino G., Cistaro A., et al. (2021) State of the art of 18F-FDG PET/CT application in inflammation and infection: a guide for image acquisition and interpretation. Clin Transl Imaging. 9(4): 299-339. doi: 10.1007/s40336-021- 00445-w.

Chen Z., Chen X., Wang R. (2022) Application of SPECT and PET / CT with computer- aided diagnosis in bone metastasis of prostate cancer: a review. Cancer Imaging. 22(1): 18. doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00456-4.

Cortés-Vazquez A., Goitia-Landeros G.A., Regalado M.A., León-Hernández S.R., Cortés- Algara A.L., Bandala C., et al. (2021) Prediction of ovarian response in IVF/ICSI cycles. JBRA Assist Reprod. 25(3): 422-427. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210003.

Dietrich C.F., Bolondi L., Duck F., Evans D.H., Ewertsen C., Fraser A.G., et al. (2022) History of Ultrasound in Medicine from its birth to date (2022), on occasion of the 50 Years Anniversary of EFSUMB. A publication of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound In Medicine and Biology (ERSUMB), designed to record the historical development of medical ultrasound. Med Ultrason. 24(4): 434-450. doi: 10.11152/mu-3757.

Fine G.C., Smith T.A., Stein S.I., Madoff D.C. (2019) Interventional radiology’s role in the diagnosis and management of patients with gallbladder carcinoma. Chin Clin Oncol. 8(4): 40. doi: 10.21037/cco.2019.07.09.

Francone M., Budde R.P.J., Bremerich J., Dacher J.N., Loewe C., Wolf F., Natale L., Pontone G., Redheuil A., Vliegenthart R., Nikolaou K., Gutberlet M., Salgado R. (2020) CT and MR imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: standardization of scanning protocols, measurements and reporting-a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR). Eur Radiol. 30(5): 2627-2650. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019- 06357-8.

Grani G., Sponziello M., Pecce V., Ramundo V., Durante C. (2020) Contemprorary Thyroid Nodule Evaluation and Management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 105(9): 2869-83. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa322.

Hajdu S.I., Vadmal M., Tang P. (2015) A note from history: Landmarks in history of cancer, part 7. Cancer. 121(15): 2480-513. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29365.

Hajhosseiny R., Bustin A., Munoz C., Rashid I., Cruz G., Manning W.J., Prieto C., Botnar R.M. (2020) Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Technical Innovation Leading Us to the Promised Land? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 13(12): 2653-2672. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.01.006.

Hanson K., Schneider U. (2022) History of proton radiography and tomography. Z. Med Phys. 32(1): 2-4. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.11.005.

Hayashi D., Roemer F.W., Guermazi A. (2016) Imaging for osteoarthtitis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 59(3): 161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.12.003.

Ju C., Li X., Gadani S., Kapoor B., Partovi S. (2022) Portal Vein Thrombosis: Diagnosis and Endovascular Management. Rofo. 194(2): 169-180. doi: 10.1055/a-1642-0990.

Kaller M.O., An J. (2023) Contrast Agent Toxicity. 2023 May 1. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537159/ [Access date: 21.06.2023].

Klarov L.A., Platonov F.A. (2017) Computer tomography (CТ) or magnetic resonance imaging (МRI)? Science and Engineering in Yakutia. 1(32): 28-31.

Kocher M., Ruge M.I., Galldiks N., Lohmann P. (2020) Applications of radiomics and machine learning for radiotherapy of malignant brain tumors. Strahlenther Onkol. 196(10): 856-867. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01626-8.

Kratochwil C., Flechsig P., Lindner T., Abderrahim L., Altmann A., Mier W., et al. (2019) 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer Uptake in 28 Different Kinds of Cancer.J Nucl Med. 60(6): 801-805. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.227967.

Lanza G.M., Cui G., Schmieder A.H., Zhang H., Allen J.S., Scott M.J., et al. (2019) An unmet clinical need: The history of thrombus imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 26(3): 986-997. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0942-8.

Lauterbur P.C. (1973) Image Formation by Induced Local Interactions: Examples of Employing Nuclear Magnetic Resonanse. Nature. 242: 190-191. doi: 10.1038/242190a0.

Lees C.C., Romero R., Stampalija T., Dall'Asta A., DeVore G.A., Prefumo F., et al. (2022) Clinical Opinion: The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 226(3): 366-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1357.

Lima T.F., Gamba T.O., Zaia A.A., Soares A. (2016) Evaluation of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of root resorption. J. Aust Dent J. 61(4): 425-431. doi: 10.1111/adj.12407.

Mangla A., Oliveros E. , Williams K.A. , Kalra D.K. (2017) Cardiac imaging in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Curr Probl Cardiol, 42 , pp. 316-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2017.04.005.

Marques J.P., Simonis F.F.J., Webb A.G. (2019) Low-field MRI: An MR physics perspective. J Magn Reson Imaging. 49(6): 1528-1542. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26637.

Martire F.G., Lazzeri L., Conway F., Siciliano T., Pietropolli A., Piccione E., et al. (2020) Adolescence and endometriosis: symptoms, ultrasound signs and early diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 114(5): 1049-1057. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.012.

Nicolau C., Antunes N., Paño B., Sebastia C. (2021) Imaging Characterization of Renal Masses. Medicina (Kaunas). 57(1): 51. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010051.

Oskovi Kaplan Z.A., Ozgu-Erdinc A.S. (2018) Prediction of Preterm Birth: Maternal Characteristics, Ultrasound Markers, and Biomarkers: An Updated Overiew. J Pregnancy. 2018: 8367571. doi: 10.1155/2018/8367571.

Pastore M.C., Mandoli G.E., Contorni F., Cavigli L., Focardi M., D'Ascenzi F., et al. (2021) Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: Early Predictor of Diagnosis and Prognosis in Coronary Artery Disease. Biomed Res Int. 2021: 6685378. doi: 10.1155/2021/6685378.

Pedreira O., Correia M., Chatelin S., Villemain O., Goudot G., Thiebaut S., et al. (2022) Smart Ultrasound Device for Non-Invasive Real-Time Myocardial Stiffness Quantification of the Human Heart. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 69(1): 42-52. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3087039.

Pu Y., Wang C., Zhao S., Xie R., Zhao L., Li K., Yang C., et al. (2021) The clinical application of 18F-FDG PET/CT in pancreatic cancer: a narrative review. Transl Cancer Res. 10(7): 3560-3575. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-169.

Radzina M., Biederer J. (2019) Ultrasonography of the Lung. Rofo. 191(10): 909-923. doi: 10.1055/a-0881-3179.

Riddell Z.C., Corallo C,. Albazaz R., Foley K.G. (2023) Gallbladder polyps and adenomyomatosis. Br J Radiol. 96(1142): 20220115. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220115.

Rischpler C., Nekolla S.G., Heusch G., Umutlu L., Rassaf T., Heusch P., et al. (2019) Cardiac PET/MRI-an update. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 3(1): 2. doi: 10.1186/s41824-018-0050-2.

Salerno A., Strambo D., Nannoni S., Dunet V., Michel P. (2022) Patterns of ischemic posterior circulation strokes: A clinical, anatomical, and radiological review. Int J Stroke. 17(7): 714-722. doi: 10.1177/17474930211046758.

Salzman B., Collins E., Hersh L. (2019) Common Breast Problems. Am Fam Physician. 99(8): 505-514.

Scatliff J.H., Morris P.J. (2014) From Roentgen to magnetic resonance imaging: the history of medical imaging. N C Med J. 75(2): 111-113. doi: 10.18043/ncm.75.2.111.

Schima W., Böhm G., Rösch C.S., Klaus A., Függer R., Kopf H. (2020) Mass-forming pancreatitis versus pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: CT and MR imaging for differentiation. Cancer Imaging. 20(1): 52. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00324-z.

Tay Y.X., McNulty J.P. (2023) Radiography education in 2022 and beyond – Writing the history of the present: A narrative review. Radiography (Lond). 29(2): 391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.01.014.

Toussie D., Voutsinas N., Chung M., Bernheim A. (2022) Imaging of COVID-19. Semin Roentgenol. 57(1): 40-52. doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2021.10.002.

Yang T., Ma L., Hou H., Gao F., Tao W. (2022) FAPI PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Abdominal and Pelvic Tumors. Front Oncol. 11: 797960. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.797960.
Publicado
2024-04-25
Cómo citar
Bogomolov, D. A., Antonov, A. E., Ilin, A. I., Beliaeva, M. V., & Bogomolova, T. A. (2024). Beneficios de las técnicas modernas de imágenes en Medicina. Revista De La Universidad Del Zulia, 15(43), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.43.07