Características que actúan en los jóvenes como prerrequisitos psicológicos para evitar la intimidad psicológica en las relaciones

• Tatyana V. Skutina Siberian Federal University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1772-8108
• Yulia G. Yudina Siberian Federal University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2063-7079
• Vera V. Korshunova Siberian Federal University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2042-2417
• Dmitry N. Kuzmin Siberian Federal University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8489-4683
• Ekaterina V. Potapova Siberian Federal University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9302-5810

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.35.26

Palabras clave: juventud, actitud, diferencias individuales, actitud parental, cercanía psicológica, autonomía, tipo de apego, jóvenes, percepciones subjetivas de cercanía

Resumen

El artículo fundamenta empíricamente la hipótesis sobre la gravedad de las características de evitación de la intimidad psicológica en los jóvenes: baja autonomía, duda de uno mismo, presencia de un tipo de apego evitativo, contradependencia, la falta de intimidad experimentada en las relaciones con adultos significativos en la infancia y las necesidades de aislamiento y seguridad en las percepciones subjetivas de la intimidad psicológica. Estas características se compararon en dos grupos de jóvenes de 20 a 25 años; la muestra fue de 60 personas. Se utilizaron métodos: "Cuestionario de dependencia interpersonal" (p. Girshfield, adaptado por O.P. Makushina), el cuestionario "La experiencia de las relaciones cercanas" de K. Brennan y R.K. Fraley, adaptado por T.V. Kazantseva, la prueba de contradependencia (B.K. Weinhold, D.B. Weinhold). La severidad de la cercanía de los adultos importantes en la infancia, las peculiaridades de las ideas subjetivas sobre la cercanía psicológica fueron reveladas por el método de conversación y mediante la creación de un dibujo "La imagen de la relación deseada". Los resultados del estudio mostraron que las diferencias entre los grupos son significativas en todos los parámetros planteados en la hipótesis (p ≤ 0.01). Las ideas subjetivas sobre la intimidad difieren en la severidad de las necesidades de ser el centro de su mundo en una relación; en comunidad, en la observación de los límites personales; (p ≤ 0,01); sentirse seguro en una relación (p ≤ 0,05).

Citas

Avdeeva, N.N. (2017). Attachment theory: modern research and perspectives. Modern foreign psychology. Electronic journal.Vol. 6.No. 2. P. 7–14.DOI: HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.17759/JMFP.2017060201

Borodovitsyna, T.O. (2020). Features of psychological well-being of students of various training profiles.World of Science.Pedagogy and psychology, No. 4(8). Available at: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/45PSMN420.pdf

Bowlby, J. (2003). Affection. Edited and introductory article by G. V. Burmenskaya; Translated from English by N.G. Grigorieva and G.V. Burmenskaya. Moscow: Gardariki, (OJSC Mozhaiskpolygraphic combine). P. 447.

Breslav, G.M. (2010). Fundamentals of psychological research. Moscow: Publishing house Academy. P. 496.

Brish, K.H. (2012). Attachment disorders therapy: From theory to practice. Moscow: Cognito-Center. P. 316.

Collins, N.L., Feeney B. C. (2004). An attachment theory perspective on closeness and intimacy.Handbook of closeness and intimacy. New Jersey, P. 163 – 189.

Curtis, R. (2016). The Use of Imagery in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy.Journal Psychoanalytic Inquiry, No. 36 (8), P. 593 – 602. DOI:10.1080/07351690.2016.1226033

Dergacheva, O.E. (2002). Autonomy and self-determination in the psychology of motivation: the theory of E. Desi and R. Ryan. Modern psychology of motivation. Moscow: Smysl, 2002. P.103 - 121.

Diagnostic portfolio for determining the propensity to addictive behavior. Tula: Regional Center “Development”, 2019. P. 80.

Erickson, E. (1996). Identity: youth and crisis. Moscow: Progress.

Faranda, F. (2016). Image and Imagination: Deepening Our Experience of the Mind. Journal Psychoanalytic Inquiry, No. 36 (8), P. 603 – 612.DOI.org/10.1080/07351690.2016.1226037

Fedorenko, E. Yu., Skutina, T.V., Kalinovskaya, K.S., Potapova, E.V. (2018). Trait Anxiety Index Among Students with Different Levels of Xenophobia. Journal of Siberian Federal University.Humanities & Social Sciences.No. 11(2). P. 185 – 191.DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-0179.

Garaa-Alandete J. (2015). Does meaning in life predict psychological well-being? The European Journal of Counselling Psychology.Vol. 3 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/ejcop.v3i2.27

Hanson, R, J. (2002). Mother Nurture: A Mother’s Guide to Health in Body, Mind, and Intimate Relationships. New York: Penguin.

Kartasheva Yu. V., Grishina N.V. (2015) Existential correlates. Psychological well- being.Scientific research of graduates of the Faculty of Psychology of St. Petersburg State University / ed. A.V.Shaboltas. - St. Petersburg: Publishing house C.- St. Petersburg University.

Kazantseva, T.V. (2008). Adaptation of the modified methodology “experience of close relations”.Izvestia of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen. P. 139 - 144.

Kazantseva T. V. (2011) New in the research of psychological intimacy. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Ser. 12. 2011. Issue 2.

Krok, D. (2018) When is Meaning in Life Most Benefical to Young People? Styles of Meaning in Life and Well-Being Among Late Adolescents. Journal of Adult Development.No. 25. P. 96 – 106. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1007/S10804-017-9280-Y

Kulikov, L.V., Pastushik, M.M. (2009). Review of foreign studies on the problem of emotional closeness. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University.Series 12.Issue. 4.

Makushina, O. P. (2007) Portfolio for determining the propensity to addictive behavior. Tula: Regional Center “Development”, 2007. P. 80.

Melnikova, V.B. (2014). Autonomy of personality: an overview of foreign approaches to problems. Psychological research.Vol. 7.No. 37.P. 9.

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being.American Psychologist.Vol. 55. P. 68 – 78.

Sabelnikova, N.V. (2008). Methods of studying attachment in the process of age-related development in modern foreign psychology.Bulletin of St. Petersburg University.Series 12.Issue 3. P. 36 - 47.

Sergeev, S.M. (2018). Autonomy as a factor of social identity.Materials of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference, Armavir State Pedagogical University. P. 95 - 98.

Smolyaninova, O.G., Rostovtseva, M.V., Yudina, Yu.G.,Korshunova, V.V., Potapova, Ye.V. (2021). Project-based activity as a mechanism of reflection development in students of psychology and education studies. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Humanit. Soc. Sci. No 14(3). P. 385 – 395. DOI: 10.17516/1997–1370– 0730.

Stankovskaya, E.V. (2014). To say «yes» to oneself: existential-analytical perspective on autonomy. Psychology.Journal of the Higher School of Economics.Vol. 11.No. 4.Р. 136 – 145

Sytko, M.V. (2011). Emotional attachment in the structure of significant personality relationships.Young Scientist.No. 11.Vol. 2. S. 119 - 122.

Vasilenko, M.A. (2011). Child's attachment to mother as an early factor.Izvestiya of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen. P. 20 - 28.

Winehold B.K., Winehold J.B. (2011). Escape from proximity. Getting rid of your relationship from counterdependence - the other side of codependency. St. Petersburg: IG Ves.

Weinhold, J.B. Weinhold, B.K. (2004). Counter-Dependency: The Flight from Intimacy. Trafford Publishing. Р. 272

Yaremchuk, S.V., Bakina, A.V. (2012). Subjective well-being of young people and its relationship with the psychological distance to objects of the socio-psychological space of the individual in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Social Psychology and Society.Vol. 12.No. 1. P. 26 - 43. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2021120103

Zalevskaya, Ya.G. (2019). Psychological analysis of drawings.Problems of modern pedagogical education.P. 32. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468

Zobkov, V.A. (2019). Substantive characteristics of a person's self-confidence.Bulletin of the Udmurt University.Vol. 29.Issue 1.P. 128.